Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

G-Nav question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Oct 2011, 21:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G-Nav question

Hi there,

I'd need some help with the following question:

The relative bearing to a beacon is 270°R. Three minutes later, at a ground speed of 180 knots, it has changed to 225°R (corrected! previously 255). What was the distance of the closest point of approach of the aircraft to the beacon?

Correct answer would be 9 nm.


I just can't figure it out at the moment (perhaps it's to late, should go to bed) - there must be a formula for this

Thanks!

Last edited by Transsonic2000; 13th Oct 2011 at 12:01.
Transsonic2000 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 03:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NL
Age: 38
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you sure the 2nd relative bearing isn't 225 degrees?
Da-20 monkey is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 06:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bohol, Philippines
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For 9 nm to be the correct answer the second RB would be 225R
SFI145 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 11:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg
Age: 46
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed, there seems to be an error. As the others have said, the given answer of 9 nm would make the second RB 225 degrees.

The answer to the question as it is would be 36 nm (using the 1/60 rule).
hvogt is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 11:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London
Age: 34
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Using trigonometry I get 33.5nm
slav4o1 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 11:58
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the respond! Yes, you guys are right, the second RB is 225 not 255 - I guess that's contributed to human error, which proofs that one should be working on this type of question when it's to late (at night)!
Transsonic2000 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.