Current opinion on Cabair Distance ATPL Groundschool?
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I take that back slightly
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/175/Flight...rch%202010.pdf
is alot better than previous years. Still pretty shocking though. Just over 50% of rating issued compared to cpl issue, and quite a few of the rating issued will be experenced pilots moving fleets.
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/175/Flight...rch%202010.pdf
is alot better than previous years. Still pretty shocking though. Just over 50% of rating issued compared to cpl issue, and quite a few of the rating issued will be experenced pilots moving fleets.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The statistics the caa does publish seemed to be designed to be totally useless
I don't understand the objection to making the stats. open; schools should be pepared to publish and justify their data. If it was presented to the CAA for validation and granted or refused a 'kite mark', that should surely be better than the current system?
The amount of data garnered at application must be used for something, or is it, as suggested, of the old school? The civil service touch that is neither Civil nor Service any longer.
Last edited by rmcb; 26th Jun 2011 at 22:17. Reason: Additional point added
I take that back slightly
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/175/Flight...rch%202010.pdf
is alot better than previous years. Still pretty shocking though. Just over 50% of rating issued compared to cpl issue, and quite a few of the rating issued will be experenced pilots moving fleets.
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/175/Flight...rch%202010.pdf
is alot better than previous years. Still pretty shocking though. Just over 50% of rating issued compared to cpl issue, and quite a few of the rating issued will be experenced pilots moving fleets.
G