Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

British airways sacking 300 employees

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 13:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down British airways sacking 300 employees

BA has announces 300 voluntary redundancies

Passenger numbers for March down 7%

Last edited by Mike.Park; 4th Apr 2009 at 21:04. Reason: peer pressure
Mike.Park is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 14:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any source, I cannot find anything on the BBC, SKY, AP or Reuters, other than this:
LONDON (Reuters) - British Airways (BAY.L) passenger volumes dropped by 7.3 percent in March, while persistent falling demand will hit full year revenue by up to 25 million pounds, it said on Friday.
The carrier said the March volume decline included a 13 percent drop in premium or business passengers, while the load factor -- a measure of how full its planes are -- dropped 6.4 points to 72.7 percent.
BA, which is in merger talks with Spain's Iberia (IBLA.MC), said revenue outlook for the year to end March would therefore be lower than expected but confirmed a February forecast that it was likely to make an operating loss of 150 million pounds, after severance costs of 75 million pounds.
But I can find quite a bit about Jade
ford cortina is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 14:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere In The South China Sea
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sacking? Or making redundant? There's a difference
Deano777 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 15:57
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Making redundant.
Does the label really matter? You've not got a job to go back to either way.
Mike.Park is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 16:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 32°55'22"S 151°46'56"E
Age: 39
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
On that line of thinking I suppose you could say:

Crashing vs Landing

Does the label really matter? You've on the ground anyway!

L'aviateur is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 16:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Age: 43
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA traffic falls 7% in March as 300 staff leave
Cirrus_Clouds is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 16:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Button Moon
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not good news but no great surprise. I was talking to a guy who turns out to be fairly significantly involved with the BA/IBERIA merger earlier in the week and he said there's lot's of talk of 'streamlining' within said merger if it goes ahead (which according to him seems pretty certain at the moment), which is bound to lead to more job losses. This could be just round one of redundancies unless things turn around pretty sharpish. Sad times.
2 Whites 2 Reds is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 19:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If anyone bothered to read the link it is 300 voluntary redundancies (so "sacking" definitely wrong) and the 300 concerned are actually part of a package announced back in January! So actually quite old news.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 20:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sacking? Or making redundant? There's a difference
Actually there is not. In the eyes of UK employment law, both are considered as as "dismissal". Both are subject to the laws of wrongful and unfair dismissal. A "fair" redundancy can be considered as a "fair" form of dismissal. An "unfair" redundancy can be fought on the grounds of wrongful or unfair dismissal.

There are dozens of websites which will detail the grounds and procedures for redundancy. And also hundreds of solicitors who will take up your case if you consider you have been unfairly stitched up.

By definition, voluntary redundancy is going to be "fair". Compulsory redundancy on the other hand, is often challengable. You probably won't get your job back, but if spot a flaw in the way you were selected, or the way the process was conducted, you may be able to negotiate a better redundancy payment.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 20:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Expect an announcement from Virgin regarding Redundancies this coming week.
Golf--Lima--Papa is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 00:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere In The South China Sea
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Old Fat One

I still disagree, to my mind redundancy means termination of employment through no fault of your own. Sacked means your employment was terminated because you broke company rules or terms of employment etc, i.e disciplinary reasons.
But hey, we're talking semantics, people are losing their jobs and that's never a good thing.
Deano777 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.