Integrated CPL/IR Vs Integrated ATPL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Integrated CPL/IR Vs Integrated ATPL
Hi guys. Could someone tell me the difference between an integrated CPL/IR and an integrated ATPL course from the point of view of gettig a job afterwards? I ask because the course Im on has recently lost its status as an integrated ATPL course due to the lack of an approved sim for the MCC (althought a new sim is currently awaiting approval from the CAA), and is now listed as integrated CPL/IR. This issue has the lot of us on the course a bit concerned, and the management are being a bit indifferent; as if its not a big deal. Just wondering what you think!?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is the difference not just that - an mcc?
I'm pretty sure a cpl/ir is just that, a cpl/ir, and that an ATPL includes an mcc.
I could be wrong but it would make sense...
I'm pretty sure a cpl/ir is just that, a cpl/ir, and that an ATPL includes an mcc.
I could be wrong but it would make sense...
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey/Bournemouth
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think you should worry too much if the mcc is the only item that has been taken off the menu. The main thing with an integrated ATPL or CPL/IR is the training route "ab-initio" - you don't have to get a PPL issued, the training is integrated from the start so you do your flying and theory moving you towards the CPL and then ME/IR, all with the same training provider. Where you do your MCC course really won't matter too much, so long as it is a reputable provider, but you do need this for the fATPL.