Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Prospective OAT Student

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2008, 17:10
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Age: 39
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the current full integrated price at oxford?

WQ, I'd say 250 a month is enough to live off. budget 300-600 for accommodation it can vary quite a bit.

As for the whole integrated-modular debate, one of the top 'newbie' recruiters showed a list of where they get their pilots from the other day and modular students were right at the bottom....
ElCapitano8 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2008, 18:39
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North West
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MIKECR

The modular route will change so much that there will be little change in the overall costs.
JAA regulators will be imposing changes soon, one of which is that any person training another for a particular type of licence must themselves hold a licence approved by that regulatory body i.e. an FAA instructor will not be allowed to train a student for a JAA licence without holding one him / herself

If you think we are rich think again, my wife and I were prepared to help finance our son's dream even if it meant reducing our standard of living.

He is paying us / the mortgage back, and yes he is SSTR also included in the mortgage.

I never doubted his motivation, so putting up the money was a risk we were prepared to take, and the results have proved the trust.

Integrated is the better way to go, and if you talk to recruiters they prefer that route in those with less than 500 hours.
Night_fr8 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2008, 21:13
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
night_fr8

I wasnt questioning your finances. You stated that you think integrated training costs will rise to 90k by 2010, so I was simply asking or even commenting as to how people will come by that sort of money in the future. Training costs have become ridiculously expensive and by all accounts will continue to rise.

Whether indegrated is the better route is open to debate.
MIKECR is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2008, 21:45
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The modular route will change so much that there will be little change in the overall costs.
It won't really. Plenty of people already train modularly at one or two schools only.
BerksFlyer is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2008, 22:23
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Berksflyer,

I think you missed Night_FR8's point.

Yes, many modular students train at one or two schools, but many of them are in the States using FAA instructors. Once these must obtain JAA ratings, the cost of delivering modular will go up a good bit.

It will also drive cost of Integrated upward, but most of the integrated schools have half or more JAA rated instructors already and they also have the ability to provide the conversion training in house at cost.

I wonder how many modular FTO's in the States will pay for conversion for their instructors. How many instructors will foot the £10K bill themselves just to keep instructing at low salaries?
Adios is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 00:10
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: End of 27L
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Night_fr8

JAA regulators will be imposing changes soon, one of which is that any person training another for a particular type of licence must themselves hold a licence approved by that regulatory body i.e. an FAA instructor will not be allowed to train a student for a JAA licence without holding one him / herself
The suggestion from EASA is that by the time this is implemented there should exist licencing reciprocity between FAA & the EASA states - i.e. an FAA CPL holder would be entitled to an EASA CPL in much the same way as PPL's are currently.

Hence, it should be no more than a paperwork exercise.
Tootles the Taxi is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 07:59
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,805
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Under the EASA proposals instructors need to hold a JAA license, not just an FI rating on an FAA license. The FAA have point blank refused to consider licensing reciprocity. In addition, although existing JAA rated instructors will be allowed to continue, the grandfather rights will apply to the instructors themselves, not the FTO, so, although the FTOs training in the US will be OK initially it will be a growing problem for them.

Last edited by Alex Whittingham; 10th Jul 2008 at 08:52. Reason: edited to correct my punctuation
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 15:05
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,805
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair my info is two months old. I think it's because the Americans don't want people training for FAA commercial licenses outside the US.
Alex Whittingham is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.