Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Near Miss?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Mar 2008, 09:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wessex!
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Near Miss?

Hiya,

What is the distance that would be classed as a near miss?
Davina777 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 09:28
  #2 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever the journalist decides!

Anyway, if you nearly miss something, surely you hit it! Surely it be termed a near hit?

Are you talking about when you would file an AIRPROX?

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 09:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Near Miss?
Yes I agrree Whirlygig.

If you nearly miss something, then you must have hit it.

Anyway to answer the question. I believe it's whenever the minimum separation distance between aircraft is breached. This varies depending on the flight category and the type of airspace you're operating in.
Sid Departure is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 09:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind You.....
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....would a TCAS R/A be classified as a near miss?
powerstall is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 10:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hold on a second gents!

The term near miss means two aircraft came close together but avoided coliding so it makes perfect sense that it is a NEAR.... but MISS.

Ain't it?
nflyer is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 10:35
  #6 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just try saying "ha-ha very funny!"

Cheers

Whirls (Miss)
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 15:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bristol
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even the jokes get torn apart ands scrutinised on this forsaken (but great) forum.
captain_rossco is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 16:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: g1000ville
Age: 50
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think 74.9% would be classed as a near miss!
bajadj is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 16:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: FAPE
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with nflyer
J'Mac is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 18:48
  #10 (permalink)  
SparksFlyHigh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I filed an airprox the other day. Someone decided to join the circuit downwind with no regard to circuit traffic. I took avoiding action and he went past and slightly below the front of me by about 100 metres. Too close for me (and anyone else).
 
Old 7th Mar 2008, 20:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cranfield UK
Age: 70
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In health & safety terms a near miss report is welcomed because action may possibly be taken to prevent potential incidents. I have had what some people might call near misses but the only time I have been seriously concerned was when the near miss was a complete surprise and when I had no opportunity to take avoiding action. This to me is a near miss and it can be as close as a few yards or quarter of a mile if big, fast or heavy!
SkyCamMK is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2008, 20:30
  #12 (permalink)  
I REALLY SHOULDN'T BE HERE
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: TOD
Posts: 2,099
Received 102 Likes on 34 Posts
A TCAS RA is not necessarily an airprox. As someone has already said, once the correct separation is maintained there is no problem. (TCAS looks at rates of closure so if somone is climbing from directly below you at, for example, 3,500fpm to level out 1000ft below you may well get a climb RA, but provided they level off 1000ft below then there has been no loss of separation).

sr
speedrestriction is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.