Notices
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

ATPL Performance Question

Old 26th January 2008 | 12:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
ATPL Performance Question

Taken from an Italian question bank. Could someone explain how you get to this answer? Only one I've found which a few of us can't arrive at happily.

----

An airfield has a TORA of 3,000m with the first obstacle (that protrudes above an upward slope of 1.25% from the end of the runway) 6,560ft away. What would the TODA be for an aircraft with 3 turbojet engines?

a) 4500ft
b) 5000ft
c) 14760ft *
d) 16400ft


* Answer is C. How?
Spotted the obvious trap of 3000m needing to go to feet but don't know which factor to apply to the distances to arrive at C.

Something similar on Bristol question bank too with no explaination apparantly.
Appreciate the help.
Zyox is offline  
Old 26th January 2008 | 12:41
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 4
From: Bristol, England
The maximum TODA is one and a half times the TORA, 3000 x 1.5 = 4500m, converted into feet to match the answers.
Alex Whittingham is online now  
Old 26th January 2008 | 13:03
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Hmmmm I can't see that in the Oxford book at first glance anywhere you'd expect it. Grr.

Thanks for the help Alex! Fingers crossed it comes up now
Zyox is offline  
Old 26th January 2008 | 14:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
ZYOX

Your Oxford notes probably tell you it in an indirect way.

Such as:

a. The TODA = TORA plus Clearway

b. The maximum allowable clearway = 50% of TORA.

Putting these two together gives you maximum TODA = 1.5 x TORA.
Keith.Williams. is offline  
Old 26th January 2008 | 14:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Ah yes. Found it on page 13-3 taken directly from JAR-OPS 1.490

"Take-off Distance required must not exceed the Take-Off Distance available, with a clearway distance not exceeding half of the Take off Run available"

Well deduced Keith, cheers Feckin' sneaky one though. They don't elaborate or cover it anywhere else and it's come up a few times in questions. Had it on some ground school notes though, with a side note nicely pointing out that it's 1.25 x TORA (if there's no clearway of course) for Single Engine Pistons.

I'd give anything to be back in the days of only have to remember which was bigger, Vx or Vx >_<
Zyox is offline  
Old 27th January 2008 | 09:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
I think that you need to take care in reading your notes.

The 1.25 factor is not relevant to the question that you have asked. It does not apply to the TODA, but to the Take-Off Distance or TOD. If there is no stopway and no clearway you multiply the TOD by 1.25 to get the TODR, which must not be greater than the TODA (which with no stopway and no clearway is equal to the TORA).

The TODA is the Take-off Distance Available.

The figure that comes out of the take-off graphs is called the Graphical Distance.

The TOD is the Graphical Distance increased by the surface and condition factors.

When you then increase this by the Regulatoty factor you get the TODR. This must not be greater than the TODA.

The 1.25 regulatory factor (paragraph 2.1.1 (a) in the CAP 698) applies only when their is no Stopway and no Clearway.

If a Stopway or a Clearway exist then you must use the other factors listed in paragraph 2.1.1 (b)

These factors also apply to multi engine aircaft.
Keith.Williams. is offline  
Old 27th January 2008 | 09:29
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Hmmm no I took that figure from a consolidation course where they told us that, or obviously weren't clear enough on what exactly it was.

Time to go over these distances in a little more detail I think...
Zyox is offline  
Old 27th January 2008 | 23:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: The Minch
fish

Read thrice then read again.
SYYHerring is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.