Flight performance question
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Essex England
Flight performance question
Hi hope someone can explain this?????????
In the BGS database a question asks what factor for landing distance for a T/Jet be multiplied for LDR. (question 4226)
Tjets are factor 1.67 and 60%
The factor is 1.67 but the correct answer given is 0.60
Why? as I have always factored using the 1.67
Solution would be helpful
Cheers
Mick
In the BGS database a question asks what factor for landing distance for a T/Jet be multiplied for LDR. (question 4226)
Tjets are factor 1.67 and 60%
The factor is 1.67 but the correct answer given is 0.60
Why? as I have always factored using the 1.67
Solution would be helpful
Cheers
Mick
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Uk
The point is that the question stated "what must you multiply the LDA by". The word multiply is the key.
2000 m LDA. If you multiply this by 1.67 you get 3340. Erm, if the runway is only 2000 m, I would not suggest you land in 3340 m.
So we take the LDA 2000m and multiply it by 0.6 to get 1200. OK? You must have a mass that will allow a landing in 1200m in order to comply with the regulations.
You have probably been used to doing questions with calculations the other way round. I.e You have a landing distance of 1500m, what must your LDA be?. In this case, yeah, multiply the 1500m by 1.67 to find the appropriate length of runway.
Easy when you know how
Steve
2000 m LDA. If you multiply this by 1.67 you get 3340. Erm, if the runway is only 2000 m, I would not suggest you land in 3340 m.
So we take the LDA 2000m and multiply it by 0.6 to get 1200. OK? You must have a mass that will allow a landing in 1200m in order to comply with the regulations.
You have probably been used to doing questions with calculations the other way round. I.e You have a landing distance of 1500m, what must your LDA be?. In this case, yeah, multiply the 1500m by 1.67 to find the appropriate length of runway.
Easy when you know how
Steve
Last edited by pugzi; 19th November 2007 at 14:23.





