Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Ground School Exam Questions & Question Banks

Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Ground School Exam Questions & Question Banks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Apr 2005, 20:28
  #61 (permalink)  

Supercharged PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Doon the watter, a million miles from the sandpit.
Posts: 1,183
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(b) increases, remains constant.

Descent at constant mach # means increasing IAS, thus decreasing CL and increasing descent angle. Switching to constant IAS means constant CL, and constant descent angle.

Do I win £5?
G SXTY is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2005, 10:13
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, I'd go for B.

Think this question is attempting to confuse you with angle of descent and angle of attack.

Descending with a constant Mach no. will see an increase in EAS, which will result in the need for a lower angle of attack. If you lower the angle of attack in a descent the nose will go down, and if the a/c nose goes down then it goes without saying that the angle of descent will increase.
kalibarr is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2005, 13:09
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: seat 0A
Age: 41
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I concur - B is the answer to go for. A quick(!) explanation off the top of my head:

Mach Number is the ratio of true airspeed to the local speed of sound. Local speed of sound is solely dependent on temperature, which decreases with increasing altitude. So as you descend, the air temperature is increasing and therefore the local speed of sound is increasing. To maintain the same mach no the indicated (and therefore true) airspeed will have to increase, which means you lower the nose and increase the descent angle.

As you descend further you will reach an altitude where the mach number you are descending are coincides with the indicated airspeed you want to descend at. If you keep on lowering the nose after this point you will exceed this airspeed and so the descent angle is held constant.

Hope that helps!

Al
ATP_Al is offline  
Old 23rd May 2005, 15:19
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Singapore
Age: 42
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ground School Exam Questions & Question Banks

Please don't grill me as I've tried to fid the details in GETMET and other sources but what does the AUTO and NDV mean in this METAR as I haven't seen this before.

EGPU 231450Z AUTO 20003KT 9999NDV // BKN022 SCT044 10/04 Q1004

Thanks for your help

The Reverand
Reverand Lovejoy is offline  
Old 23rd May 2005, 15:30
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: TL487591
Posts: 1,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AUTO (surprise surprise), this METAR was produced by a machine, rather than by a person.


NDV means "No Directional Variations" available. Ordinarily, in conditions of restricted visibility, an observer may indicate the direction in which the visibility is either best or worst. In this case, no such distinction is available. 9999 in all directions.

2D
2Donkeys is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2005, 10:17
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ground School Exam Questions & Question Banks

At CAS 250kts, FL390, JSA +8*C what is the TAS?

A)439
B)482
C)458
D)464

The ans is given as 464kts, but I keep getting 482... the only way to get to 464 is to use ISA values for the temp, am i right in thinking the temp in this question is
-55? or have i messed up because its the JSA???

Confussed???!!!

G-SP0T is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2005, 10:38
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oxford
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that you are not applying the correction for compressibility.

JSA +8 @ FL390 is -55ºC, as you say. That gives 482 knots before correction for compressibility (with a CRP-5 - you may find that an ARC2 gives a slightly different answer).

With compressibility corrected,the answer comes to about 463 or 464.

If your FTO has not shown you how to correct for compressibility, read the little booklet that comes with the flight computer.
oxford blue is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2005, 10:43
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for that!

I think I got carried away applying ram rise corrections as well, which was bring me back to too high a ans...
G-SP0T is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2005, 12:37
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
inst question

the interception of a ILS beam by the auto pilot takes place :
A)according to a interception verces range and angle
B)at a constant heading

The white arc of the EGT gauge is:
A)special op range
b)normal op range
G-SP0T is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2005, 14:41
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi there,

1. a

2. a

Been a while since I studied for the Instruments exam, but I do remember these questions and I'm fairly confident in my answers.

Please correct me if I'm wrong
Gillespie is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2005, 15:07
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kilmacolm
Age: 47
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The first one is (a).

Think of the special operating range of an ASI. That'd be the Flap operating range... what colour is it? White. Apply this concept to the EGT guage. (That is how I remember this one anyway).

The second is also (a).

Last edited by Charlie Zulu; 28th Jun 2005 at 15:43.
Charlie Zulu is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2005, 15:21
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a and a...
when you intercept the ILS, your plane is using a sinusoidal signal and calculate the angle to intercept the ILS .angle are different for any distance.So it can not be at straight angle.
spaceman1000 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2005, 14:54
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Ground School Exam Questions & Question Banks

anyone answer this for me ? and why?

for a jet cruising at 1.32 vimd a 5% decrease in weight would give a change of fuel flow by approx:

10% decrease
5% decrease
5% increase
2.5% decrease

cheers..
aerosteve is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2005, 17:49
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mainland
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1.32 vmd

Fuel flow at 1.32 vmd will decrease at the square root of the change in weight or (for small changes half the change.)

hense 2.5%


At VMD the change would be equal

At VMP the change would be squared(doubled for small change)



Fullrich
fullrich is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2005, 19:19
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats very interesting Fullrich and makes sense when you consider the shape of the drag curve
I have read much debate on similar questions and your reply has clarity
Have you a reference for it?
Aim High is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2005, 18:30
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: location
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ground School Exam Questions & Question Banks

hey guys and gals ...


I faild instruments becasue of this question. Does anyone know how 2 answer it, because my father and i and a few other guys have no clue!!


here it goes ...

An aircraft flies a mesured course of 5NM between two pylons at 7000ft palt ., temp 15deg celcisus in 2min45sec. flying the revers in 2min19sec

if the asi was 100kts the asi error was

(A) 1kts under read
(B) 3kts over read
(C) 3kts under read


thanx hope sumone can help

sean

Last edited by zssp; 13th Aug 2005 at 20:02.
zssp is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2005, 19:21
  #77 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you certain you have made no typographical errors in the numbers?

I think it is begging for this:
Total track miles......... 10 miles.
Total time...................2.45 + 2.15=5.00
Therefore TAS 120kts ->

A circular slide rule should make this easy- it's not to hand, so I have had to resort to complicated corrections below.
From "Mathematically increase your indicated airspeed (IAS) by 2% per thousand feet of altitude to obtain the true airspeed (TAS)." and to allow for temperature error, "when changing IAS to TAS you need to add one knot to your Indicated airspeed (IAS) for each five or six degrees the temp is above standard day, at altitudes from 5,000 to 15,000 ft"(http://www.csgnetwork.com/tasinfocalc.html) and (http://www.sonic.net/~pjkelly/tswinds.html)
So, TAS is higher than IAS by 14% for Pressure Altitude correction, or Pressure corrected IAS=106 kts(106+14%=120), then subtract 3 kts for temperature error (because ISA at 7000' is +1 deg C, ie we are flying at ISA+14deg C), ie IAS should be 103kts, but it is actually 100kts, so it is underreading by 3.


Now PLEASE can we have a look at your grammar?

Last edited by Rainboe; 13th Aug 2005 at 19:56.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2005, 19:53
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: location
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanx .. thats how i was asked the question in the paper and ive found the same one in 2 question books thanx for the help .. i looked all over for a way to work it out and you way seems to make more sense ... i do appologise i shuld type slower and read over what ive writen
zssp is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2005, 19:57
  #79 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(Head in hands....crying)

It's actually 34 years since I did this sort of calculation, so any confirmation from anybody would be very welcome (but do start sentences with capitals and don't forget punctuation!).
Rainboe is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2005, 20:04
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: location
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it was really good i must say. I really do think thats an ATPL question. I know my problem is i just try get things done in to much of a rush. But i will try more in future but thanx so much for helping me out.

hey a guy on avcom wrote this

i would choose B - 3 knots over-read. A calibrated airspeed of 100Kts at 15 C at a Palt of 7000 feet equates to 113 Kts TAS. As the different times taken to fly the route indicates a wind correction of 10 Kts needs to be applied (129 Kts one way and 109 kts returning) Hence the TAS -Wind correction equals 103 knots - hence 3 knot over-read


b is the answer in the book
zssp is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.