Want to fly for us? That's $33,150, please
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Essex
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Want to fly for us? That's $33,150, please
Article in today's Sydney Morning Herald - "standard practice now" according to increasing number of airlines!
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/...816321075.html
Can't be long now before they make you pay online subscription just to look at their entry requirements!!! Oops - hope I'm not putting ideas into their heads!
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/...816321075.html
Can't be long now before they make you pay online subscription just to look at their entry requirements!!! Oops - hope I'm not putting ideas into their heads!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sinik...This sort of thing has been going on here for a while, I think Ryanair's current fees are £50 to look at your CV, £250 for your interview/sim check and £20,000+ for your type rating, welcome to 21st century aviation 
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Essex
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercenary Pilot,
I don't doubt it - disappointing when an airline spokesman says it is "standard" though! You've got to have bottomless pockets or rich (willing to sponsor) parents to get into this game, not to mention, hard work, determination and luck!
I don't doubt it - disappointing when an airline spokesman says it is "standard" though! You've got to have bottomless pockets or rich (willing to sponsor) parents to get into this game, not to mention, hard work, determination and luck!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive been reading this debate since I joined pprune. The harsh reality is everyone has got to remember that paying for training is not just limited to pilots. Chances are that engineers, doctors, architects etc etc who have gone to at least reasonable colleges and universities have incurred debt similar to a pilot who has bought a type rating. Its common to hear of doctors owing well over 100000us after study. Even a good business degree from a university will cost you more than it does to fly.
I guess I have just come to terms with the fact that its not just aviation where wannabes get robbed. If you want something bad enough, you'll have to pay for it and employers seem to have no problem exploiting that.
The beef I have with it is that once you have paid your way through your training and your first rating, maybe flown a 737 for 2000 hours and then want a job flying a 320 for Jetstar they STILL charge you half a years salary (at least) for the rating. And then you move to the UK to fly for Ryanair or EasyJet and they CHARGE YOU AGAIN! Nowadays it seems unless you join a legacy carrier you are going to have to pay everytime you change jobs. So much for being hired just based on experience!
I guess I have just come to terms with the fact that its not just aviation where wannabes get robbed. If you want something bad enough, you'll have to pay for it and employers seem to have no problem exploiting that.
The beef I have with it is that once you have paid your way through your training and your first rating, maybe flown a 737 for 2000 hours and then want a job flying a 320 for Jetstar they STILL charge you half a years salary (at least) for the rating. And then you move to the UK to fly for Ryanair or EasyJet and they CHARGE YOU AGAIN! Nowadays it seems unless you join a legacy carrier you are going to have to pay everytime you change jobs. So much for being hired just based on experience!
Spicy Meatball
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Liverpool UK
Age: 42
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even a good business degree from a university will cost you more than it does to fly
Cheers,
Maz
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think one thing is paying for training, another thing is paying for illusions.
A type rating is expensive stuff but at least it gives you something back, and you can use it for the rest of your career, not only with Ryanair. And the 737NG is a pretty popular machine these days.
I also believe that Ryanair give you a job on completion of the type rating, which is some sort of guarantee at least.
Paying for illusions, like the more and more frequent new fake-sponsorship schemes which charge money from the day of your selection tests, that's a bit unfair. Certainly if the FTO's didn't lobby with the airlines to secure places for their own cadets, the training market would be subject to competition and, possibly, it would drive the prices down, not up !
A type rating is expensive stuff but at least it gives you something back, and you can use it for the rest of your career, not only with Ryanair. And the 737NG is a pretty popular machine these days.
I also believe that Ryanair give you a job on completion of the type rating, which is some sort of guarantee at least.
Paying for illusions, like the more and more frequent new fake-sponsorship schemes which charge money from the day of your selection tests, that's a bit unfair. Certainly if the FTO's didn't lobby with the airlines to secure places for their own cadets, the training market would be subject to competition and, possibly, it would drive the prices down, not up !
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mazzy1026
Never! How can training to ATPL level cost more than a 3 or four year degree at £1000 per term? It would be good to know of another profession that actually costs you train...nurses, doctors, firefighters, all get paid to train.
Cheers,
Maz
Cheers,
Maz
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Uk
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mazzy1026
It would be good to know of another profession that actually costs you train
My girlfriend spent £30k studying to be a Lawyer, that included 3 years at University and 2 years at Law school.. 5 years and £6k a year is not that unreasonable!
Please don't feel that hard done by.... We are not the only ones out there spending a small fortune to get where we want to be!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ryanairland
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An investment?
I have paid for a type rating. I didn't enjoy writing the cheque and I would have loved to find an airline willing to pay, but I didn't.
However, to compare my situation to a friend of mine;
I spent in the region of £80k all in over 20 months to be a 737 first officer. By 24 months after starting training my pay is equal to that of my friend.
He spent 5 years doing a masters in IT and now has a job with a well known firm in the city (London). He works Monday to Friday, doing similar lengths of days to me and has the same number of days annual leave. I work 5 on, 4 off most of the year.
His course cost £25,000 over 5 years, so I spent £55,000 more than him, but I started earning 3 years earliler. I will earn much more than £55,000 in that time. We are both equally happy as we are both in the careers we wanted. I also have a friend who has just qualified as a Lawyer and she also took 5 years to qualify with similar costs to my first friend.
I guess my point is that, while having to pay for a type course is a real shock and that I firmly believe trainining on a company's equipement should be at the company's cost, it is not a bad investment.
However, to compare my situation to a friend of mine;
I spent in the region of £80k all in over 20 months to be a 737 first officer. By 24 months after starting training my pay is equal to that of my friend.
He spent 5 years doing a masters in IT and now has a job with a well known firm in the city (London). He works Monday to Friday, doing similar lengths of days to me and has the same number of days annual leave. I work 5 on, 4 off most of the year.
His course cost £25,000 over 5 years, so I spent £55,000 more than him, but I started earning 3 years earliler. I will earn much more than £55,000 in that time. We are both equally happy as we are both in the careers we wanted. I also have a friend who has just qualified as a Lawyer and she also took 5 years to qualify with similar costs to my first friend.
I guess my point is that, while having to pay for a type course is a real shock and that I firmly believe trainining on a company's equipement should be at the company's cost, it is not a bad investment.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Overseas student fees. Its fair enough if you have eligability to study in your own country, or can do the course you want there. If your an Indian national for example wanting to study in the UK your looking at least 10000 sterling a year. Buddy of mine went to Penn State university in the US to do media. 20000 usd a year. It seems rediculous but thats the reality. And if you want to do medicine, even on resident fees, probably expect to incur a higher debt than a pilot.
Im not defending the airlines, Im a pilot, got big debt, wish it was like the old days when it came to the training. However here are the days of the LCCs and monster fuel prices. Our industry is not the only one getting shafted. By realising that I find it easier to come to terms with the cost of all the training.
My opinion
DB
Im not defending the airlines, Im a pilot, got big debt, wish it was like the old days when it came to the training. However here are the days of the LCCs and monster fuel prices. Our industry is not the only one getting shafted. By realising that I find it easier to come to terms with the cost of all the training.
My opinion
DB
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It might cost you similar money but the big difference is in Australia is the HECS. You don't actually pay anything back until your pay is above a certain threshold. All interest free to boot I'm led to believe.
A big difference to borrowing $100k+ at unsecured loan rates on the off chase of securing a job.
Once again the risk reward equation just dosn't quite add up in favour of an aviation career these days does it?
A big difference to borrowing $100k+ at unsecured loan rates on the off chase of securing a job.
Once again the risk reward equation just dosn't quite add up in favour of an aviation career these days does it?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mazzy1026
£20k for a degree in the US ? 
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=506710
Join Date: May 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never! How can training to ATPL level cost more than a 3 or four year degree at £1000 per term? It would be good to know of another profession that actually costs you train...nurses, doctors, firefighters, all get paid to train.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a difference between paying for your own basic training - similar to paying for your own degree, and paying for your type rating (equivalent company specific training, housemanship for doctors, etc.)
Before becoming a pilot I was an engineer. My company paid for my degree and I was expected to work back for them for an equivalent period of time. (bond) During the first 2 years I was an engineering trainee and spent most of the time on training courses at company expense. During this time I was paid a salary even though I added very little value to the company.
I can think of no other industry where you are expected to pay for your company training once you have qualified. First of all you can't choose what aircraft your company flies so you are obliged to do the type rating on the type that they operate. The airline should pay for this since it is in house training for their own specific operational requirements. If they bond you for this training - fair enough, although I cannot think offhand of any other industries that do this. Doctors dont pay for their postgraduate training. Nor do engineers, architects, lawyers, plumbers, builders etc. etc.
Before becoming a pilot I was an engineer. My company paid for my degree and I was expected to work back for them for an equivalent period of time. (bond) During the first 2 years I was an engineering trainee and spent most of the time on training courses at company expense. During this time I was paid a salary even though I added very little value to the company.
I can think of no other industry where you are expected to pay for your company training once you have qualified. First of all you can't choose what aircraft your company flies so you are obliged to do the type rating on the type that they operate. The airline should pay for this since it is in house training for their own specific operational requirements. If they bond you for this training - fair enough, although I cannot think offhand of any other industries that do this. Doctors dont pay for their postgraduate training. Nor do engineers, architects, lawyers, plumbers, builders etc. etc.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ryanairland
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I said above I disagree with paying for company specific training, although I did give in and do it. Having done it though I don't regret it. For interest though my lawyer friend was paid peanuts for her first year and a half and was worked to the bone. That does sound comparable to a Low Co airline or three I could mention.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Woof etc
I can think of no other industry where you are expected to pay for your company training once you have qualified. Doctors dont pay for their postgraduate training. Nor do engineers, architects, lawyers, plumbers, builders etc. etc.
The same is the case in many other professions. A Masters in Construction Management can set you back £11k for a part time degree. There are few construction companies paying that sort of money. The best they might do is pay the subscriptions to a professional body (about £200).
Of course when you are in self employment as many builders and plumbers are then there is only one person who can pay.
With so many pilots looking for jobs and effectively undercutting each other the employers have the whip hand.
The aviation labour market is just like any other market. If the pilots played hard to get then the employers would have to change their tune. But with big debts from the training, and being desperate to fly, the emplyers win.
There is a paradox there somewhere. How insane do you have to be to rack up so much debt when there is no guarantee of a job.
Outside aviation they would be regarded as a nutter and people would cross the street to avoid them.
In aviation we call them pilots and put 200 lives in there hands for long periods of time.
Wow!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a difference between paying for your own basic training - similar to paying for your own degree, and paying for your type rating (equivalent company specific training, housemanship for doctors, etc.)
Theschultx - Even in the UK because of all the taxes paid by families over the years, a degree is offered at a pretty reasonable price. However, millions of other people around the world wanting a similar education do not have that luxury and have to fork out the full whack of overseas fees. And like a previous poster said, it wont be long until fees are hiked up to that of the US.
Back to the type ratings, it wouldn't be so bad if airlines offered you a job before you pay for the rating. I know this is not true with all airlines, I think Southwest will put you through your paces THEN tell you to get at least a 732 rating and they will put you in the pilot pool. The problem is the airlines who don't look at your CV until you have the type. A sort of 'Get a type and we'll talk' attitude. Thats where you take the biggest gamble. I have spoken to far too many people who have spent a couple of months and 20000 pounds on a type and are doing their IR renewal in a Seneca 1 year down the line. You may be a great pilot, but that type rating doesnt help if your rubbish in the interview! I was very careful, as I'm sure richarjm would tell you, before putting pen to paper on a cheque. And yes, when you do you think holy crap, but you do get the rewards back quickly, PROVIDING there is a job there at the end.
Put it this way, I have instructor mates building up hours and experiance that way. Don't get me wrong, if it weren't for the instructors none of us would be where we are today. They object to paying for a type, not because they cant afford it, but because they feel experience in the instructor field will prevail and that airline job will come. RESPECT! However its not what they want to do (they want to be in big shiny planes
) had a crap year up to this summer because of the weather and get paid piddles.I on the other hand got the instructors rating then thought screw it. Really not what I wanted to be doing. Got a loan, built some twin time, bought a rating and now fly internationally @ FL250 doing 80Hrs turbine time a month and get paid more than twice what my mates are getting instructing. What would you rather be doing?
People will say that the pilots who keep paying for ratings are adding fuel to the fire and the more people that pay the more airlines will say pay for your training. But its the reality of today, just please make sure that if you do, its not in vain. BE CAREFUL!
DB
Last edited by Desert Budgie; 29th Jul 2006 at 06:44.