Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Bernoulli equation: perhaps not significant ?

Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Bernoulli equation: perhaps not significant ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 09:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Stanstead
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bernoulli equation: perhaps not significant ?

I'm studying for the ATPL "principles of flight" exam. The Bernoulli equation is used to describe how an aircraft wing generates lift. However, I came across this very interesting website (below) that posits a physical description of lift. It suggests that the action:reaction of directing air downwards is the main contribution for lift generation and the Bernoulli lift contribution is small. It says that a Cessna 172 at 140kts displaces 5 tonnes of air downwards per second to produce lift. It's well worth reading but I don't know wheather to trust the information. Does anyone have an opinion on this ?

http://www.aa.washington.edu/faculty/eberhardt/lift.htm
bultaco is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 09:28
  #2 (permalink)  
FFP
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting stuff, but while studying for exams, I'd stick to the syllabus and basics, otherwise you could confuse yourself in the exams.

The examiner won't be trying to disprove Bernoulli !!
FFP is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 09:37
  #3 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I started this thread in Tech Log for that very reason: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=207289

The Bernoulli doesn't add up as a principle means of lift for me either. Some good comments in the thread.
 
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 11:17
  #4 (permalink)  
Gizajob
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
Age: 49
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Bristol notes do mention the Newton III theory if only in passing. Neither Newton nor Bernie made an appearance in the exam though.
EGBKFLYER is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 13:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Oddly enough, I do teach it in my notes, but with a big warning to go back to it after you've spurted out the Bernoulli stuff in the exams. It makes complete sense, but Stick and Rudder said that too, many years ago. Bernoulli is what the examiners want, though. Go back to that site after you've passed!

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2006, 13:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: manchester UK
Age: 52
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are pretty much right. Bernoulli theorm has a minimum contribution to lift and virtually none with speeds above Mach2. I dont have my notes with me at the moment so please dont ask me to go into detail! , but my lecturer here in Spain is from one of the top proffesors in Aerodynamics and boy is he good!, he has the same theory of the limited contribution to lift.
hughesyd is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2006, 07:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This topic is currently being discussed in Tech Log, the appropriate forum for this kind of discussion. As this thread has nothing to add to that I've linked to, I shan't move it but I shall close it. Please continue your discussion on that thread.

Scroggs
scroggs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.