Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Importance of ATPL theory results?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2005, 10:22
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But it won't be! Sometimes I feel I'm banging my head against a brick wall....

Scroggs
scroggs is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2005, 10:44
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi TolTol
Will see you in Octobre. I am sooooooooo looking forward to these exams
powdermonkey is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2005, 17:16
  #43 (permalink)  
Flintstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here's the exception that proves the rule.

Thomsonfly ask on their application form for your exam scores. They also ask for pass marks from secondary school.

Are they kidding? I can't remember what I had for breakfast let alone what I scored in Remedial Woodwork.

Too............much..........cosmic..............radiation.. .................uuuuunnnggghhhh!!
 
Old 28th Sep 2005, 09:18
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Listen To The Pro's!

I think that this comes down to precisely what Scroggs and 727man have already tried to explain. IMO You will always get those who have to work exceptionally hard to achieve the bare minimums, the same as you will get the others who's effort is minimal to achieve the higher grades (and combinations thereof). Can you distinguish who's who just by looking at a set of results? I think not. This is why airlines (amongst other reasons) have interviews to discover a persons true personality.

To my way of thinking those who here who see fit to argue with the comments of our two seasoned proffesionals above, may need to look at there own personality. After all, they have the jobs and it will be people just like them on the otherside of the desk when we are going to interview.

As for the hours: well just ask the thousands of university graduates out of work or in jobs not befitting of their qualifications. Experience speaks volumes.

My conclusion: Give ground studies your all and achieve the best you can, but 75 is the number that matters. If the airlines wanted more they would surely ask.
Evilbob is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 20:59
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is why airlines (amongst other reasons) have interviews to discover a persons true personality.
All research into interview techniques has shown that face to face interviews will give the least accurate reflection on a person, they also tend to be biased, wat if the guy giving the interview is having a bad day, or doesnt like ur face!

that said, its still the most popular technique, but some people are realiseing its limitations, ie the police, at no stage are you interviewed by a person its all group work etc.
G-SP0T is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 21:19
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no idea whether your information is correct or not, but I don't know of any airline (or selective training organisation) that doesn't use the face-to-face interview as its primary selection tool. It's usually combined with some aptitude testing, possibly some examinations, maybe a group exercise or two, and often a sim check, but the interview will be the deciding factor. The main point of the interview is not to test your knowledge, or assess how you work with others, it's really to see if you're the kind of guy we could sit next to in a flight deck for 12 hours. And you can't establish a candidate's motivation from a group exercise.

I doubt we'll see things changing on that front any time soon.

Scroggs
scroggs is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2005, 21:52
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Planet Oceana
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Importance of the ATPL Theory test results to me is simply the fact that without them you will never have an ATPL.

As long as you have passed them you should have the barest minimum of knowledge that you are going to need so an airline can train you to fly their aeroplanes the way they want you to. I can't see the relevance the actual score would have to any employer, unless the exam actually asked you every possible question on every possible scenario. Anyone feel like writing 14 exams with 14 billion questions each?

My advice is make sure you pass the 14, fly as well as you can, impress everyone you can at the interview with what a super addition to the team you'll make, kiss backside if you have to, network as much as you can, pray, pray some more, beg, beg some more and never stop believing that you'll get there.

Stick to it and you will.

Good luck.
Hobgoblin is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 07:21
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,806
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My view in old age, is that, whatever you do, you should do it to the best of your ability. If at some future date someone gives you credit for your efforts that is a bonus, if they don't you at least know you did the best you could. Looking back at my youth I am ashamed at the number of times I did just enough to pass when I might have excelled.
Alex Whittingham is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 10:49
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hill Street Blues
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very well said Alex, hope everything is well at BGS. From an old student
FF
Frank Furillo is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 19:01
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do I smell that someone here doesn't want their pass rates to be lowered?
Martin1234 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2005, 20:42
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,806
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear, the world is too cynical. That's the best advice I can give you.
Alex Whittingham is online now  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 11:49
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alex is absolutely right, and Martin's cynicism is misplaced. As I have said repeatedly on this thread, you should aim for the best result you can get. Once you've got it (and the licence in your hand), don't worry too much about what airlines might think about individual exam results; you'll probably never have to reveal them.

Scroggs
scroggs is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 12:07
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be honest i really don't think the exam marks between sittings are even comparable.

They are slung out of a computer and printed.

The difference between monthly sittings can be huge. When i did my instruments only 20% of the people where passing then 5 months later it was up to 70% (these numbers where given to me by my ground school).

So in one month you can be in the top 20% with a 75%.
And the next bottom 40% with the same mark.

And the chief pilots all know this as many of them had to sweat blood to get through the bloody things.

Which is why one or two companys might use them to get the number of applications down (but it will be HR not the ops side of things). But nobody really cares.

MJ
mad_jock is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 12:32
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATPL exam marks are NOT of great importance. That's just the way it is. And this is from someone who's passed them less than a year ago and is now looking for the first job in the aviation business.

My CV doesn't mention my marks and I had a 93% average. If these marks would help me find a job, trust me, they'd be on my CV!!!


BTW, every airline recruitment process will have exams that will test your knowledge on Performance, Air Law, etc, anyway.
Odlix is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 12:40
  #55 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
And this is from someone who's passed them less than a year ago and is now looking for the first job in the aviation business.

My CV doesn't mention my marks and I had a 93% average. If these marks would help me find a job, trust me, they'd be on my CV!!!
I may or may not agree with you. Regardless, how does your current lack of success securing a job validate your credentials
 
Old 30th Sep 2005, 13:40
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,447
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I haven't come across an airline that tested my knowledge on any of those subjects either!
Megaton is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 21:16
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that smiling smileys signified irony, not cynism.
Martin1234 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.