BGS Progress tests
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BGS Progress tests
Hi, (hopefully Alex is reading this)
How long should you spend on the progress tests from BGS? I like to do them thoroughly (sometimes using the text) and spend up to 2 hours to complete them, sometimes even more.
I'm currently sitting the General Navigation 6 paper on Plotting. I've taken ages over it so far.
As a result I'm achieving high grades of 90%ish per paper, but should I exercise more speed for a sacrifice in score?
Many thanks
How long should you spend on the progress tests from BGS? I like to do them thoroughly (sometimes using the text) and spend up to 2 hours to complete them, sometimes even more.
I'm currently sitting the General Navigation 6 paper on Plotting. I've taken ages over it so far.
As a result I'm achieving high grades of 90%ish per paper, but should I exercise more speed for a sacrifice in score?
Many thanks
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Uk
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You need to get it down to about 20 minutes per test. Repeat and repeat and repeat, all subjects.
I am currently doing an FI(R) rating and have been taught a CRP5 method which will save you ages on the wind calcs. Allegedly it is the system that the CRP5 designer had planned.
1. Set up with your wind first - and planned airspeed.
2. Move the slider down to the squares at the bottom. (well down)
3. Change track setting from wind to planned track.
4. Draw a vertical line above and below your cross.
5. Slide slidey bit back up.
6. Align your vertical lines with the nearest drift line on the scale.
7. Read off heading and groundspeed.
I need to scan my whizzwheel to clarify or pm me to go over it over the phone. 100% accurate but easier to demonstrate than type!
I am currently doing an FI(R) rating and have been taught a CRP5 method which will save you ages on the wind calcs. Allegedly it is the system that the CRP5 designer had planned.
1. Set up with your wind first - and planned airspeed.
2. Move the slider down to the squares at the bottom. (well down)
3. Change track setting from wind to planned track.
4. Draw a vertical line above and below your cross.
5. Slide slidey bit back up.
6. Align your vertical lines with the nearest drift line on the scale.
7. Read off heading and groundspeed.
I need to scan my whizzwheel to clarify or pm me to go over it over the phone. 100% accurate but easier to demonstrate than type!
Last edited by benhurr; 22nd Dec 2004 at 14:34.
Gillespie
From what I can tell different people have different methods. I always treated the progress tests as a closed book exam because I wanted to see what I had remembered. Having taken the test and usually scored badly I checked all incorrect answers and then took the whole test again. I found this good because you often come across questions that you guessed and got correct and it helps to see it a second time. (It's a real bugger when you get it wrong the second time!) I usually scored high 90's or 100's the second time through the test. Worked for me.
I don't think it matters how long it takes at this stage. When you go on the brush up all of the exams that you get set will have realistic time limits for you to work to. Things like Gen Nav and Flight planning will always take a long time due to the amount of calculation and whizz wheel work required, HP &L will be quick coz you either know it or you don't.
The best place to find out what other students do is on the Jals forum. There is a lot of discussion there about these sorts of things.
Benhur is correct that you do need to be proficient on the whizz wheel. I use the wind up technique for wind calcs however that is the easy part, it's the other side you need to be good at. practice, practice, practice. If there's anything you don't get, which doesn’t get sorted on the forum, fear not it will be sorted on the brush up.
I don’t think that Benhur’s technique is correct (or it’s just different to what BGS teach). The part at the very bottom is used for calculating runway headwind/tailwind/x-wind components. If it’s runway calcs that you are doing then you set the slider so that the top of that area is on the center dot of the wheel. If you are trying to do GS/Drift calcs then you put your TAS in the center, set the wind up, draw the wind on the chart, and simply rotate the wheel leaving the slider where it is. It’s all explained in the CRP5 and BGS notes.
Good Luck
SW
From what I can tell different people have different methods. I always treated the progress tests as a closed book exam because I wanted to see what I had remembered. Having taken the test and usually scored badly I checked all incorrect answers and then took the whole test again. I found this good because you often come across questions that you guessed and got correct and it helps to see it a second time. (It's a real bugger when you get it wrong the second time!) I usually scored high 90's or 100's the second time through the test. Worked for me.
I don't think it matters how long it takes at this stage. When you go on the brush up all of the exams that you get set will have realistic time limits for you to work to. Things like Gen Nav and Flight planning will always take a long time due to the amount of calculation and whizz wheel work required, HP &L will be quick coz you either know it or you don't.
The best place to find out what other students do is on the Jals forum. There is a lot of discussion there about these sorts of things.
Benhur is correct that you do need to be proficient on the whizz wheel. I use the wind up technique for wind calcs however that is the easy part, it's the other side you need to be good at. practice, practice, practice. If there's anything you don't get, which doesn’t get sorted on the forum, fear not it will be sorted on the brush up.
I don’t think that Benhur’s technique is correct (or it’s just different to what BGS teach). The part at the very bottom is used for calculating runway headwind/tailwind/x-wind components. If it’s runway calcs that you are doing then you set the slider so that the top of that area is on the center dot of the wheel. If you are trying to do GS/Drift calcs then you put your TAS in the center, set the wind up, draw the wind on the chart, and simply rotate the wheel leaving the slider where it is. It’s all explained in the CRP5 and BGS notes.
Good Luck
SW
Last edited by Sky Wave; 21st Dec 2004 at 07:12.
Supercharged PPRuNer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Doon the watter, a million miles from the sandpit.
Posts: 1,183
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah yes, General Nav progress test 6 – plotting. I’m still having counselling about that one! It took me a whole day to complete, and I never did manage to pass it. 
It didn’t seem to make much difference, as most of it doesn’t come up in the exam, and by the time Baz has finished with you at BGS, you’ll be going to sleep dreaming General Nav. questions (literally).
If you’re averaging 90% ish in the progress tests, you should arrive for the groundschool well prepared.
It didn’t seem to make much difference, as most of it doesn’t come up in the exam, and by the time Baz has finished with you at BGS, you’ll be going to sleep dreaming General Nav. questions (literally).
If you’re averaging 90% ish in the progress tests, you should arrive for the groundschool well prepared.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with vfe
when I was studying my bgs notes I always used the text for for the progress tests . why bother wasting the whole day trying to pass a progress test when you could be moving on with the rest of the manual .. just learn the correct method and use the notes that you have to aid you in your progress .. flightime
it worked for me I passed them all ..
when I was studying my bgs notes I always used the text for for the progress tests . why bother wasting the whole day trying to pass a progress test when you could be moving on with the rest of the manual .. just learn the correct method and use the notes that you have to aid you in your progress .. flightime
it worked for me I passed them all ..
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Down South now...
Age: 43
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
bristol kick ass
end of......in 2 weeks you wil prob know more than you have learnt in 5 months.
worked for me, and i'm pretty thick!
ps learn how to work the crp5 very fluidly, the gen nav exam this time seemed to consist of 30% wwheel stuff
WBV
end of......in 2 weeks you wil prob know more than you have learnt in 5 months.
worked for me, and i'm pretty thick!
ps learn how to work the crp5 very fluidly, the gen nav exam this time seemed to consist of 30% wwheel stuff
WBV
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Other schools are now starting to claim that Bristol GS are planting fake posters on this website as a way to drum up business. Thats what I was talking about.
I’m sure Alex spends far more time on his own website than on this one so your much more likely to get an answer! Also for other Bristol students who may wish to know the answer, it would be much more helpful if they could see it on JALS rather than here as this information is useless to other ATPL students.
I mean no disrespect; I just don’t like any decent Training establishment getting a tarnished reputation for something that they probably have no control over
Regards
2WINGS
Hi, (hopefully Alex is reading this)
How long should you spend on the progress tests from BGS?
How long should you spend on the progress tests from BGS?
I mean no disrespect; I just don’t like any decent Training establishment getting a tarnished reputation for something that they probably have no control over
Regards
2WINGS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Other schools are now starting to claim that Bristol GS are planting fake posters on this website as a way to drum up business.
In fairness, I think you maybe referring to the recent and infamous punch-up thread. What the person (school) in question was asking was why are there so many people who praise BGS on this site. Some read the surrounding text as an implied accusation that there are fake "BGS is wonderful" posts. This was not actually claimed by the person (school) in question, neither did I think it was intended. But like all gosip it has more inertia than a depleted uranium anti-tank round.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, the thread on PPRuNe you are referring to came after the rumours had started in the real world. You are correct it is gossip but gossip can be extremely damaging and has help to finish off more than one ground school in the past! Unfortunately, things like this get around very quickly!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cant bristol afford to have their own website?
Pretty poor school if they dont have their own student forums in my humble opinion ! On the surface this does appear to have the markings of a pr stunt.
Pretty poor school if they dont have their own student forums in my humble opinion ! On the surface this does appear to have the markings of a pr stunt.
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well if enough people posted their views on schools instead of running for cover in fear of ridicule perhaps the wannabes forum will be able to claw back some of the respect and usefullness of past years and prospective students wouldn't lose thousands of pounds with the wrong FTO. Some of the few people posting here are no longer using wannabes for their own ends - some are paying back the debt they owe from information gained prior and during their own training.
If enough people are praising a school then there has to be substance to it and as such must be taken at face value or else what hope is there for a forum such as this? A school of BGS's integrity would never need to stoop to such low levels as drumming up business on PPRuNe anyway. When I attended their brush up course there was a three month waiting list so things cannot now be so bad that someone with the credibility of Alex Whittingham has to write spurious posts on PPRuNe. Anyone who has met the guy would know this.
The top schools like BGS deserve every good word that goes their way and if some simpletons think this is some sort of mass deception and false advertising then they're going to lose out when it comes to making their own choices of ground training providor. Who would think such a thing anyway?
VFE.
If enough people are praising a school then there has to be substance to it and as such must be taken at face value or else what hope is there for a forum such as this? A school of BGS's integrity would never need to stoop to such low levels as drumming up business on PPRuNe anyway. When I attended their brush up course there was a three month waiting list so things cannot now be so bad that someone with the credibility of Alex Whittingham has to write spurious posts on PPRuNe. Anyone who has met the guy would know this.
The top schools like BGS deserve every good word that goes their way and if some simpletons think this is some sort of mass deception and false advertising then they're going to lose out when it comes to making their own choices of ground training providor. Who would think such a thing anyway?
VFE.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To call potential students "simpletons" is more than a little harsh! You were once one (no offence). It’s very easy to be lead into decisions at the start of professional training by sales blurb and rumours! If the school you attend was so good that feel you should put in writing well that’s fine! However my criticism is that the initial post should NOT be on PPRuNe it’s for JALS and only adds fuel to the fire, so to speak.
2WINGS
2WINGS
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bristol do have a website at: www.bristol.gs
Their forums are also available to anybody, and can be located at: http://www.jals.co.uk/forum/index.php?
As for doing the progress tests, they are meant to be done closed-book, i.e. no reference to the text.
I would try and do each subject in a frame as if you need to pass the progress test without reference. i.e. avoid just reading the text once and then doing the progress tests. At the very least try and make sure you understand the concepts before moving on. You will find that you must do this in subjects like Met, Gen Nav, PoF, Perf and Instruments.
There will be the odd time when you have to look at the texts; certainly it is likely you will need to if you fail a particular test. I treated each test like a hurdle - I didn't move on to the next subject until I had gotten my 75% +.
Their forums are also available to anybody, and can be located at: http://www.jals.co.uk/forum/index.php?
As for doing the progress tests, they are meant to be done closed-book, i.e. no reference to the text.
I would try and do each subject in a frame as if you need to pass the progress test without reference. i.e. avoid just reading the text once and then doing the progress tests. At the very least try and make sure you understand the concepts before moving on. You will find that you must do this in subjects like Met, Gen Nav, PoF, Perf and Instruments.
There will be the odd time when you have to look at the texts; certainly it is likely you will need to if you fail a particular test. I treated each test like a hurdle - I didn't move on to the next subject until I had gotten my 75% +.
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look 2wings, I wasn't calling all potential students simpletons at all. Just saying that anyone who espouses the same view as you on this matter is probably a simpleton. Can you handle that? 
VFE.
VFE.
Guest
Posts: n/a
2Wings,
This initial post about BGS specific progress tests possibly should be on JALs, but really, does it matter?
In fact, up until your first post in this thread, the advice could probably be applied to the passing of any Gen Nav test.
However my criticism is that the initial post should NOT be on PPRuNe it’s for JALS and only adds fuel to the fire, so to speak.
In fact, up until your first post in this thread, the advice could probably be applied to the passing of any Gen Nav test.