Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Hours building v Instructor Rating?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th February 2004 | 21:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: California (Highway Patrol)
Cool Hours building v Instructor Rating?

Hi folks,
Was wondering if anyone that has already made it could offer some advice on whether an Instructor Rating is considered more valueable than simple hours building (be it on SE/ME or on MEJet SIM).
Am at the usual stage now where the next decision could be crucial to making it. All advice is welcomed.

My understanding is that whilst an intructor rating is a good skill to have, to be an instructor is not all that relevant to daily life as a pilot (Not nec IR flying, maily VFR, possibly SE only, with things happening far slower and simpler than Jet flying). Would Jet Sim time be more appealing to an Airline, or do they simply look at Total time?

Cheers
FP



Frank Poncherello is offline  
Old 12th February 2004 | 02:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
Hi Frank,
You forgot to mention what stage you're at now.
100hrsTT/200/ 300?
If you want to pay for every hour up to your FAA (I assume) ATPL go ahead.
That's gonna be another 1200x $70=$84,000
How are you ever going to reach even part 135 minimums if you are going to timebuild?
And explain to me how sim could be more valuable than actual flying?
You''ll get plenty of IFR time if you do your CFII also and work at the right school.
Instructor not relevant to daily life as a pilot?
Where did you get that from?
What about working long hours 7 days a week, flying with people that are total strangers (initially at least)
As far as I know airlines (especially in the US) hold CFI's in higher regard than others during the interview process.

Last edited by B2N2; 12th February 2004 at 06:54.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 12th February 2004 | 03:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: england
Hour build on a twin , single engine is a waste of time !!!
muck-savage is offline  
Old 12th February 2004 | 07:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
Time build twin.......yeah right

Muck-savage...fail to see how 50-100hrs multi is going to change anything if your lowtime (<500hrs)
Your money is just going to run out quicker that's all.
When are people going to realise airline recruiters WILL NOT BE KNOCKING DOWN YOUR DOOR the moment you get your Commercial with 250hrs.
Total time is time no matter what it is, SE ME whatever.....
Wake-up..... born yesterday?
B2N2 is offline  
Old 12th February 2004 | 16:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Instructing will always be better than hour building if you are paying.

The additional things you learn about aviation and people can't be listed properly.

In the UK the instructors rating costs 5k in one year I logged 900hrs and was payed about 11k. So each hour cost me 5.56 per hour for the rating so I was looking at 6k profit on the year.

Not much to live on i know but boy it was fun.

MJ
mad_jock is offline  
Old 12th February 2004 | 21:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
Thanks Mad-jock,
Same here...did 3000hrs in 3.5 years of flight instruction, most of it SE yes, but invaluable experience anyway.
About the lack of IFR...I did 140 approaches in the last 6 months flight instructing.
I know I'm not flying most of them hands-on but we are on an IFR flight plan and my brain needs to be in gear even more than the students, I have to anticipate everything that could go wrong also...
B2N2 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.