PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   Implied zone transit clearance?? (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/263661-implied-zone-transit-clearance.html)

dsandson 11th February 2007 15:34

Yeah Martin I know what you mean. Funnily enough I was thinking of the same thing when planning a nav flight just before you posted about this.

Anyway, its nice to have an idea of what to say when you're in doubt of your clearance... theres nothing that i hate more than my finger hovering over the ptt button wondering how to word a question!

Dave

IO540 11th February 2007 17:17

For example the text books would say that you can fly at 2100ft without clearance if CAS is from ground to 2000ft, however, good manners would suggest that you still look for a clearance

Actually, no, they have no authority to issue a clearance in that case :)

It's good manners to call them up because (Brize Norton is a classic case, where I have flown many times overhead) they often have traffic about in the overlaying Class G, and they may indeed like to direct you about a bit.

It's one of those bizzare things. You could overfly Brize at 3600ft, non-radio, non-transponder, and I guess they have to assume you are above their airspace.

High Wing Drifter 11th February 2007 18:28


I guess they have to assume you are above their airspace.
Primary radar can determine altitude. Is this information not included in civil displays?.

Chilli Monster 11th February 2007 18:50


Primary radar can determine altitude.
What rubbish! No it can't - that's what Secondary radar (SSR) is there for.

The only primary radar that can detect altitide are purpose built height finders (conventional radars put on their sides) which can give the height on one aircraft (normally) by scanning up and down. They have to be rotated manually in Azimuth to physically point at the aircraft to achieve that.

The only other one is a phased array head such as the Military's PAR (Precision Approach Radar) which again will scan in a limited area only on the final approach.

Fuji Abound 11th February 2007 18:56

I am not sure secondary is all that good when the traffic is overhead either - Chilli please correct me if I am wrong.

Chilli Monster 11th February 2007 19:38

Depends where the secondary head is.

Not many airfields, civil and military, have their own SSR. Bournemouth does, but it's in the minority. Many civil airports pipe in data from NATS SSR heads. Bristol, Filton, Cardiff? from Clee Hill in Shropshire, East Mids & Humberside from Claxby on the Lincolnshire wolds. Waddington's SSR is at Scampton, Cranwell & Coningsby at Cranwell. So, although you may be overhead the airfield, you may not be in the SSR overhead (which will be a blindspot).

Fuji Abound 11th February 2007 19:45

Chilli

Thanks for the clarrification.

Southend came to mind when I made the comment who usually say they cant see you in the overhead so I assume theirs is not pipe fed.

Is it the case that if it is a LARS unit the head is at the unit, or do some rely on piped in radar information?

High Wing Drifter 11th February 2007 20:17

Hmmm. yeees, not entirely sure where I was coming from there Chilli :\

Chilli Monster 11th February 2007 20:39

HWD - never mind, we all have brainstorm days!

Fuji - The primary radar head will always be on the airfield, it's just the secondary that's often "offset". The only variation is the likes of Thames radar, LTCC at West Drayton, plus the centres at Swanwick and Prestwick who use remote heads around the country.

Fuji Abound 11th February 2007 20:49

Thanks Chilli.

- sorry for the thread drift.

flower 11th February 2007 21:40

Just continuing the thread Drift, Cardiff has it's own SSR but also uses Clee Hill on it's long range planning display. We do lose SSR in the overhead with Cardiff SSR as it is based on the airfield but we have dispensation to use Clee Hill in the overhead for our en route traffic.

mccourtm 12th February 2007 09:18

Actually, no, they have no authority to issue a clearance in that case

IO540, I agree with what your saying. We don't ask for clearance but rather let them know that we'll be crossing at 2100 ft.

I'm assuming then that when you ask for a zone tranist the reply is always
"G-XXXX cleared to transit zone not above 2000 feet" that this is because the CAS is only up to 2000 feet and that they have no control above this altitude??

chrisbl 12th February 2007 19:37

The issue about cleared to ender CAS in different countries is interesting and practices vary.

In the US, to enter Class C and D two way radio contact only needs to be established (use of each others call signs). The word "cleared" is not necessary. However to enter class B a positive clearance is needed.

It seems to me that the UK operates class D like the US operate class B.

I dont know what the Irish rules are re class C or the French rules re Class D

IO540 12th February 2007 20:00

It seems to me that the UK operates class D like the US operate class B

I think all of Europe does that, but different countries/units work it differently strictly.

No idea which one is departing from ICAO, but it's a bit academic.

HR200 12th February 2007 22:24

The way I was taught is if there is any doubt, check! Airspace violations can be very serious. There is no harm asking if you are cleared to enter any airspace just before entering it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.