Implied zone transit clearance??
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rep of Ireland
Age: 61
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Implied zone transit clearance??
While going on a local trianlge nav ex flight from my home airfield which happens to be in class D airspace, but the turning points on the route are outside of controlled a/s, I'm told to report at the various turning points. When I commence the last leg (which is mainly outside of controlled a/s)I'm told to report at a vrp that's inside of controlled a/s near the airfield.
Am I to assume from this that I have been given clearance to tranit the airspace??
Am I to assume from this that I have been given clearance to tranit the airspace??
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NW England
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds to me that you are retaining your ATC approach (or Tower) coverage throughout the exercise so I don't think that you are 'assuming' anything - you have been under the control of ATC throughout the exercise and if anything the zone has been extended to the extremes of your exercise turning points.
Then again I could be completely wrong.
Then again I could be completely wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This kind of thing (an implicit clearance through CAS) is quite common, though more common abroad (where transits are generally much easier to get) than in the UK. You can fly all the way through France for example without ever getting one "clearance" through Class D - they aren't bothered.
It's best to always call them up with "G-XXXX confirm cleared through CAS on route XXX-YYY". That puts the ball in their court.
If you are on a radar service then it hardly matters though.
It's best to always call them up with "G-XXXX confirm cleared through CAS on route XXX-YYY". That puts the ball in their court.
If you are on a radar service then it hardly matters though.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: HARROGATE
Age: 64
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You dont actually say who it is you are reporting to!
It may be your base airfield, who has an arangement for entry into the controlled airspace in which it resides without the need for comms with the relevant ATC unit. I am thinking Denham, who are within the Heathrow zone but are allowed to enter/exit via northern routes without contact with Heathrow Director. So if you were to do a mini nav/ex from there to the north you would stay on base frequency and no clearance is required for re-entry!
Which airfield are we talking of here?
It may be your base airfield, who has an arangement for entry into the controlled airspace in which it resides without the need for comms with the relevant ATC unit. I am thinking Denham, who are within the Heathrow zone but are allowed to enter/exit via northern routes without contact with Heathrow Director. So if you were to do a mini nav/ex from there to the north you would stay on base frequency and no clearance is required for re-entry!
Which airfield are we talking of here?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maders UK
Age: 57
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought it might be Galway trying to lure you into their zone (like a mermaid onto the rocks) so that they could hit you with their (rather extraordinary) VFR transit charge!
SB
SB
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought it might be Galway trying to lure you into their zone (like a mermaid onto the rocks) so that they could hit you with their (rather extraordinary) VFR transit charge!
Actually all controlled airspace in the Republic of Ireland is class C (bar some area where light aircraft rarely venture which is class A). We don't have any class D.
mccourtm's post did confuse me given his location and the class D reference but he's clarified that now
and if anything the zone has been extended to the extremes of your exercise turning points.
As to the original question, I sometimes get a similar thing at my home airfield (Dublin) when arriving back from a cross country.....told to report a point inside the zone when I'm outside and haven't been explicitly cleared in. If it's obvious to me that the clearance is implicit, then I usually preface my read back with "Understand cleared into the zone at xxxx report............." . At this point the ATC'er usually clarifies and confirms that I am cleared into the zone.
If there is any doubt in my mind at all, then I take IO540's approach and directly ask if I am actually cleared into the zone at this point.
dp
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thing is very common in my experience. It is normal to receive a :
"XYZ radar, GABCD 10 north with zulu for landing"
"GABCD XYZ radar roger, QNH1013, Expect runway 26 report airfield in sight"
"GABCD wilco"
.....where no express class D entry clearance is given. In the past I have queried and asked "confirm GABCD is cleared into XYZ class delta", and have always received a "GABCD cleared into class delta, report airfield in sight".....but now don't bother. I would if there was any ambiguity.
"XYZ radar, GABCD 10 north with zulu for landing"
"GABCD XYZ radar roger, QNH1013, Expect runway 26 report airfield in sight"
"GABCD wilco"
.....where no express class D entry clearance is given. In the past I have queried and asked "confirm GABCD is cleared into XYZ class delta", and have always received a "GABCD cleared into class delta, report airfield in sight".....but now don't bother. I would if there was any ambiguity.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"XYZ radar, GABCD 10 north with zulu for landing"
"GABCD XYZ radar roger, QNH1013, Expect runway 26 report airfield in sight"
"GABCD wilco"
"GABCD XYZ radar roger, QNH1013, Expect runway 26 report airfield in sight"
"GABCD wilco"
Also under a FIS, you are not under the control of ATC, you are, as the name implies, in receipt of an information service only. You do not need to ask for any changes of level or heading. You are not required to make any reports, unless asked to.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Toadpool's right. Once you've left CAS you've left CAS and as such you need a proper clearance to re-enter. If you get this again you have to get it confirmed formally as a clearance so it's on the tapes.
It's lax - pure and simple, I wouldn't dream of doing it.
It's lax - pure and simple, I wouldn't dream of doing it.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, make sure you have the clearance, listen out for the magic of ".. .. you are cleared .. .." and if you dont get it ask.
The discipline is a good one because somewhere else you will make the same assumption, only to find that the controller feels strongly otherwise.
Be equally careful in France. It is even easier to assume you have been cleared. A good friend of mine thought he had, not least because he had called the unit concerned on a number of occasions without response, so assumed they were closed. He proceeded without the clearance. He was reminded of his transit when he received a letter from the CAA following up one form DGAC.
The discipline is a good one because somewhere else you will make the same assumption, only to find that the controller feels strongly otherwise.
Be equally careful in France. It is even easier to assume you have been cleared. A good friend of mine thought he had, not least because he had called the unit concerned on a number of occasions without response, so assumed they were closed. He proceeded without the clearance. He was reminded of his transit when he received a letter from the CAA following up one form DGAC.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, the French can be b***ers. They once, a few years ago, let me fly through a TRA while under a radar service, and 6 months later followed it up through the CAA OTOH, they routinely clear you without using the word "cleared" through Class D (VFR).
I got around the latter by reading them the route as "N-XXXXX cleared on route A B C D" and then my back is covered for their tape. Usually their reply is "Roger".
I got around the latter by reading them the route as "N-XXXXX cleared on route A B C D" and then my back is covered for their tape. Usually their reply is "Roger".
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Belfast
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fly from Ards and yeah, I'd agree always be sure you are cleared, and ask if you're not sure, even if getting a FIS.
Otherwise, just ask one of the instructors. They've always been very approachable to me, and have even said if you need to ask anything give them a call and if they're on the ground they'll do they're best.
Happy flying and I hope I'll see you around some day.
Dave
Otherwise, just ask one of the instructors. They've always been very approachable to me, and have even said if you need to ask anything give them a call and if they're on the ground they'll do they're best.
Happy flying and I hope I'll see you around some day.
Dave
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NW England
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hang on a minute - this has all got a bit complicated has iot not ??
The question was that ATC control was retained throughout the exercise - out of the zone and then back in again - so where is the issue?
If ATC asks you to report (for example) Base for 25 you might look a bit daft asking if that means you cleared to enter the zone
The question was that ATC control was retained throughout the exercise - out of the zone and then back in again - so where is the issue?
If ATC asks you to report (for example) Base for 25 you might look a bit daft asking if that means you cleared to enter the zone
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question was that ATC control was retained throughout the exercise
you might look a bit daft asking if that means you cleared to enter the zone
For example on the odd occasion returning to Dublin I would get a call like "XXX report Dunshaughlin not above 1000. We're quite busy at the moment so you can expect Broadmeadows hold for runway 29. But Dunshaughlin is your clearance limit at the moment."
Now Dunshaughlin at 1000 is outside the control zone. So I'm not cleared into the zone yet. Broad meadows and obviously runway 29 are inside the zone, where I'm not cleared yet.
Now supposing the controller, being busy, didn't say "But Dunshaughlin is your clearance limit at the moment." Could someone take the rest as an implied clearance into the zone? What if the R/t was really busy as they got to Dunshaughlin and couldn't get a word in? Would they continue into the zone for a minute or two until they could get a word in?
The only way to deal with this uncertainty is to either ask the controller what they mean, or to express your understanding of that the controller has just told you. The only person that looks a bit daft is the controller for not making it clear the first time. If enough people ask, then they will start to do it properly and give explicit clearances like they are supposed to.
dp
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got around the latter by reading them the route as "N-XXXXX cleared on route A B C D" and then my back is covered for their tape. Usually their reply is "Roger".
"GABCD cleared into XYZ class D, Wilco"......
This then ensures I have CMA.....I'm sure if it came to court, and the tapes were pulled, there'd be no case.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rep of Ireland
Age: 61
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys for your replies. I'm glad that I've sparked off a healthy disussion on this one.
I suppose the bottom line is "if in doubt shout" and don't take anything for granted.
BTW Dave, I too find the instructors in Ards very obliging and I usually do pick their brains when I'm there on a Saturday.
The good thing about posting on the web though is that we get a feel for how things operate from a broader spectrum of our colleagues in both the south and the mainland. Sometimes ATC can be a bit colloquial and of course I don't mean that procedures differ.
For example the text books would say that you can fly at 2100ft without clearance if CAS is from ground to 2000ft, however, good manners would suggest that you still look for a clearance.
Martin.
I suppose the bottom line is "if in doubt shout" and don't take anything for granted.
BTW Dave, I too find the instructors in Ards very obliging and I usually do pick their brains when I'm there on a Saturday.
The good thing about posting on the web though is that we get a feel for how things operate from a broader spectrum of our colleagues in both the south and the mainland. Sometimes ATC can be a bit colloquial and of course I don't mean that procedures differ.
For example the text books would say that you can fly at 2100ft without clearance if CAS is from ground to 2000ft, however, good manners would suggest that you still look for a clearance.
Martin.