PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   flying the TB20 (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/157971-flying-tb20.html)

Speedbird744 5th January 2005 13:21

flying the TB20
 
Will start flying the TB20 Trinidad fairly shortly and can't wait!

Can anyone give me any hints on what its like to fly?

I'm current on twins so familar with the speed issue, but is the sensation of speed much greater as the aircraft is quite small?

Performance wise with 4POB?

Thanks very much,

S744

Genghis the Engineer 5th January 2005 13:28

No idea, but presumably there's a performance section in the POH?

G

DRJAD 5th January 2005 14:06

Hired one fairly recently for an excursion with 3 pax. - very comfortable a/c to fly.

One large adult, and three others of normal size, liferaft, kit, etc., making us 7 lbs lighter than MTOW.

Performance exactly as it says on the tin (in the POH).

englishal 5th January 2005 16:33

If you fly twins, the TB20 should be no problem. Lovely aircraft to fly (and its nice to see a GS readout of 174 kts when you have a long way to go;) )

Hairyplane 5th January 2005 16:40

TB20
 
Unless you want to get in and out of a short strip.....

Those things need a lot of runway, especially if its grass.

HP

englishal 5th January 2005 17:43

TB20 can get into the Scilly Isles ok.....

IO540 5th January 2005 21:39

A TB20 can operate out of 500m tarmac at zero wind and MTOW. It's got loads of power. At Scilly Isles, one is airborne by the midpoint of the runway.

The issue with grass is much more that people with decent planes prefer to avoid it, rather than runway length. In the long run, one spends more money on gas seals and such.

There isn't a 4-seater which will take 4 present-day-sized adults and full fuel, anyway :O But a TB20 gets closer than anything in that class. Among current model machines, the SR22 is the only comparison and I would choose a TB20 even then.

2Donkeys 5th January 2005 21:46

The TB20 is a groundhog, and I speak as an owner of several.

For an aircraft of its horsepower, the take-off roll is not exactly sparkling, an effect that is more marked when heavy.

St Marys is hardly a tough test of a light single. Let's see IO540 fly it onto (and away from!) Lundy, and then we can talk.

The two selling points of the TB20 are its range (326L usable at 50L/h and around 150 knots) and its useful load.

In the non-GT form, it has limited headroom for tall blokes with headsets on, and the avionics can be a pain to work on.

Other than that, a nice aircraft

2D

Atlas Shrugged 6th January 2005 00:14

You might find something useful here:

http://www.socata.org/

AS

IO540 6th January 2005 18:34

I don't have info handy but Lundy is shown in Navbox as 200m grass.........

One may as well talk about taking a TB20 into a heliport. It's not really applicable.

The acceleration of any 250hp aircraft with a VP prop is obviously going to be very similar, and if it has a decent cruise speed then it's stall speed in landing config isn't going to be far below the certification requirement which I think is 59kt. The takeoff speed is going to be similarly related. A max perf takeoff Vr in a TB20 is about 65kt.

I've been to 500m (LSPV) and that is quite close.

To operate a 1400kg plane with a 65kt Vr from 200m with a conventional takeoff technique one would need about 500hp.

Or else do a soft field takeoff where one floats in the ground effect; a TB20 would get "airborne" in about 150m but I would not do that unless absolutely desperate, and anyway one would need the extra distance after the runway. Why take the risk?

Why is Lundy relevant to a TB20 discussion?

I've PMd the OP with some details.

2Donkeys 6th January 2005 18:46

The suggestion was that TB20s need a lot of runway - a suggestion that you appeared to contest.

There are four seat SELS with significantly better take-off performance than a TB20 without 500HP engines.

Citing St Mary's in the context of Short Fields (as you did), is not really testing the original suggestion.

TB20s require more runway than most equivalent 4 place singles, and I write that as a fan.

2D

IO540 6th January 2005 19:51

It was englishal who mentioned Scilly Isles.

However I stand by my assertion that acceleration isn't going to differ much for a given HP, so where does the short field perf come from? Has to be a wing which develops the required lift at a lower airspeed, and one pays a price for that somewhere else.

2Donkeys 6th January 2005 20:25

Indeed. The TB20 cruises faster than many similarly horsepowered engines.

It pays for that in its short field performance....

Which is where we came in.

Final 3 Greens 7th January 2005 07:45

Who has flown a Lance II (T tail) from a short, grass, field ... that sorts the men from the boys :D and it doesn't cruise as fast as a TB20 either.

Kyprianos Biris 13th January 2005 12:22

Speedbird744 I own one with a friend for few months now.
It was the best buy we could find for our budget.

Some rough observations:

On light loads you'll get airborne in 500m
On MTOW it will be arround 700~800m takeoff roll (50m obst. clearance) ; it lifts at ~600m.

You get MTOW with 4 POB with light luggage at about 3~4 hours fuel (or 2/3 of its capacity)

Only major difference I have found from previous singles I have flown is the heavier aileron and rudder (on ground). Aileron heavyness is due to it's small area in relation to the aircraft's roll moment o.i. and rudder is because of the retracable nose gear I guess.

It is a very strong aircraft for its category with very good performance due to the superb 250hp Lycoming IO540.

You'll get up to FL100~110 in 17~18 minutes and cruise there at 155 Kts (TAS) burning 12~13 gals/hr.

The landing speeds are slightly higher than the average light single (73~76 Kts) and it "settles" on the runway in heavier style than others (flare does not last long).

It has crosswind component limit of 25kts.

After carefull examination of its past (8 years) we found that there were never any serious problems in regards to mechanical issues.

Indeed at http://www.socata.org you will find a very active group of users with tech. document files, manuals, forum etc.

I was going to mention the sleak European looks but ... here's a photo album of our bird ...

http://hellasga.com/gallery/album01

helicopter-redeye 13th January 2005 13:59

I did Gamston to Girona (in Spain, N of Barcelona) via Rodez in a 20.

Nice machine and very fast/ well equipped.

As a tall geeza, no problem with headroom for me.


One may as well talk about taking a TB20 into a heliport
er, would you mind avoiding the Lundy helicport as this is even shorter than the short/ stoney/ bumpy field on said island.

;)

stuartforrest 14th January 2005 21:29

How long did that take
 
I fancy Barcelona in my A36 Bonanza but the kids get bored if it is too far.

cblinton@blueyonder. 15th January 2005 11:23


There isn't a 4-seater which will take 4 present-day-sized adults and full fuel, anyway But a TB20 gets closer than anything in that class. Among current model machines, the SR22 is the only comparison and I would choose a TB20 even then.


My Bonanza does quite happily:ok:

stuartforrest 15th January 2005 11:49

My Bonanza does too
 
Then again it has six seats. It will easily take four big adults and full fuel and baggage. I have also taken 5 adults in it on trips.

cblinton@blueyonder. 15th January 2005 11:54

It only has 5 seats, 4 plus a jump seat in the baggage compartment.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:46.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.