Originally Posted by md 600 driver
(Post 11249165)
in the uk we don’t have a class3 for pilots we have class 2 for ppl and class1 for cpl
|
An FAA third-class medical is sufficient for the validation mentioned in post 4.
Art 8 para 3 in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/723— UK version at: https://www.caa.co.uk/uk-regulations...gm-cs/aircrew/ "[...] the CAA may validate a licence which is equivalent to one of those referred to in paragraph 2 [a PPL, Balloon Pilot Licence, or a Sailplane Pilot Licence] and issued in compliance with the requirements of Annex 1 to the Chicago Convention by a third country for a maximum of 28 days per calendar year for specific non-commercial tasks, provided that the applicant complies with all of the following requirements: (a) holds an appropriate licence and medical certificate and associated ratings or qualifications issued in accordance with Annex 1 to the Chicago Convention; (b) has completed at least one acclimatisation flight with a qualified instructor prior to carrying out the specific tasks of limited duration." |
Originally Posted by selfin
(Post 11249302)
An FAA third-class medical is sufficient for the validation mentioned in post 4.
|
Genghis,
>I can't exercise my 61.75 in the USA without a class 1 or class 2 either. Or you can simply get an FAA class 3? that works. |
Selfin, whilst I agree with you about the FAA class 3 being usable / 28 days etc - are you able to point to anywhere where the CAA do admit that a FAA class 3 is ICAO compliant ? I have seen discussions that suggest otherwise.
Also the OP will still have to apply for verification of his FAA certificate/medical as part of the process. I'd be tempted to suggest reviving their brown licence if it is a lifetime one and getting a LAPL medical |
Explanatory Note to Official Record Series 4, No. 1228. UK CAA.
Published on 27 June 2017. Superseded on 8 April 2019. Although UK exemption E4433 enables FAA licence holders to fly using FAA Class 2 medicals, it has since become clear that the Class 2 FAA medical is more akin to an EASA Class 1 and that the FAA Class 3 medical is the closer equivalent to an ICAO Class 2, which is the minimum medical expected for the purposes of recognizing Third Country Licences in Annex III (4) (d) of Part-FCL. It is also clear that the general exemption made available by EASA, with the European Commission’s agreement, permits FAA licence holders intending to fly non-commercially, using private FAA licence privileges, to continue to do so using Class 3 FAA medical certificates. UK medical opinion indicates that such Class 3 FAA medicals are broadly equivalent to ICAO Class 2 medicals. Further, the United States AIP GEN 1.7 (Differences from ICAO Standards, etc) states for annex 1 chapter 2 reference 2.3.1.4: U.S. private pilots required to hold an FAA Third-Class medical certificate must meet the requirements of an FAA Third-Class medical certificate which are equivalent to ICAO Class 2 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6. The same is true for the Canadian Category 3 medical which is equivalent to an ICAO Class 2 Medical Assessment. |
I'd be tempted to suggest reviving their brown licence if it is a lifetime one and getting a LAPL medical |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:37. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.