Tower and ATC folks tell you rather bluntly that GA below 150kn approaching are a nuisance which requires special attention. The fees are
a) justified since the admin effort on their side is partly the same (it might cost them 50 to just have the internal paperwork in order) b) meant to discourage the incidental small bird from disturbing the standard operations Sad, but true. Effectively the same at all international airports AFAIK. |
Except of course in the USA where they manage perfectly well to mix Cessna 150's and A380's at even the largest most busy international airports without the need to charge a rip off fee.
Welcome to Europe. |
I thought there was an EU regulation which requires airports to let GA self handle but that many British regional airports with delusions of grandeur simply ignore it and insist on mandatory, and stupidly expensive handling. Is that right?
|
I thought there was an EU regulation which requires airports to let GA self handle but that many British regional airports with delusions of grandeur simply ignore it and insist on mandatory, and stupidly expensive handling. Is that right? |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-conte...6L0067&from=EN
Maybe 96/67-7. https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...nel-report.pdf Page 53 on link above is the UK standpoint. |
Thanks for posting this: that's what I was thinking of. I don't suppose there's much chance of it ever happening though!
|
Originally Posted by EddieHeli
(Post 9325188)
Except of course in the USA where they manage perfectly well to mix Cessna 150's and A380's at even the largest most busy international airports without the need to charge a rip off fee.
Welcome to Europe. |
And a deliberate lack of competition combined with good old-fashioned avarice.... :p
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.