PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   Airfield Blacklist? (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/411115-airfield-blacklist.html)

Flyingmac 4th Apr 2010 12:37

Airfield Blacklist?
 
Been reading some poor accounts of some airfields. Maybe there's a case for a blacklist. A simple where and why? Blackpool has recently come in for some stick. Any more?

mad_jock 4th Apr 2010 13:01

Norwich pain in the backside.

worrab 4th Apr 2010 14:11

And how about a Whitelist. There must be more than a handful of airfields where you're guaranteed a great welcome and/or fabulous scenery etc etc

Sir Herbert Gussett 4th Apr 2010 15:01

And how about a 'Private Flying' forum where everyone can post a thread about their favourite/least favourite airfield with their reasoning and there could be a bit of debate then it falls into mud-throwing where a moderator then steps in and throws the thread away, or a 'Airlines, Airports & Routes' forum where exists a good number of airfields including debate.... :ok:

A and C 4th Apr 2010 15:06

I would put both the airfields quoted above on my blacklist, as for a white list both Biggin hill (overall value for money) and Troyes (quick customs clearance) spring instantly to mind.

effortless 4th Apr 2010 15:58


and Troyes (quick customs clearance) spring instantly to mind.
And they help loading the champagne. :)

mad_jock 4th Apr 2010 18:11

worrab pretty much every airfield I have visited in Scotland I would give the big thumbs up to.

Even the big ones although expensive always seem to have some sensible way to deal with GA.

Kiltie 4th Apr 2010 18:16

Leicester. 1997. If that counts.

'Chuffer' Dandridge 4th Apr 2010 19:56

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so here's my list of places I'd rather not go again..

Panshanger (what can I say that others haven't already?.....the sooner it's a housing estate the better)
Blackpool (Security nightmare)
Norwich (Security nightmare)
Compton Abbas (Great airfield, shame about the management)
Redhill ('ATC' think they are at Heathrow)

Most airfields in the UK I'd be happy to visit, but not those listed above...

Captain Smithy 4th Apr 2010 20:25

Anywhere that insists on charging mandatory "handling" for visitors in SEP spamcans...

Looked into taking a PA-28 up to Aberdeen for an overnight to visit some friends etc., mandatory "handling" and other sundry charges totalled up to a somewhat amusing >£100. They must think us pilots are all radge. Well not me. Bugger that, will take the train or the car instead. Or take the -28 into Insch and meet someone there.

Smithy

Cusco 4th Apr 2010 21:37


as for a white list both Biggin hill (overall value for money) and Troyes (quick customs clearance) spring instantly to mind.
Try getting to Troyes at lunchtime when you need fuel and there's a frontal system up your chuff on your way back to the UK.........

Cusco

Capn Kangaroo 4th Apr 2010 23:00

Blacklists

. Elstree (EGTR) when Mick's on the radio
. Bembridge (EGHJ) ... for the "Jobs Worth" security guard

Otherwise both fantastic places to visit .. just shame about the individuals that tend to spoil things

. Blackpool (EGNH) for their inane and GA unfriendly security procedures coupled with exorbitant gas prices


Whitelist

Denham (EGLD) - great friendly welcome from the guys in the Pilot Centre
Full Sutton (EGNU) - really friendly people, and well cared for grass strip
Merignac (LFBD) - Bordeuax - really really friendly people, and great food/wine just round the corner
Ronaldsway (EGNS) - Manx Flyers, helpful and friendly .. just a shame about the £35+ handling/landing fees each time - especially when they're not even around to help push your plane back :)


just as a start .. many many more, but these are at the top of my list(s)

DC10RealMan 4th Apr 2010 23:21

I recently joined the Shropshire Aero Club at Sleap, Shropshire after thirty years flying in the south east of England. It has been a revelation-friendly and helpful staff, no CAS, laid back, no security/spotter issues, sensible flying currency rules, value for money flying, no jobsworths, the list is endless!!!!

Airbusboy 5th Apr 2010 01:36

Bourne, EGSN - Not very welcoming staff, and it felt like such a remote and dead airfield. (sorry, personal experience)

Why Norwich? I will be flying there next month.

bingoboy 5th Apr 2010 09:47

Fields with an overly developed hi viz fetish.

Caernarvon seems to have fallen.

bingoboy 5th Apr 2010 09:54

Someone put Oban on the other list. Based on experiences last summer I think perhaps it was misposted.

Captain Smithy 5th Apr 2010 12:15

That was me. I went to Oban last month for a short visit and was very happy. Will be back again soon. Friendly folks and a very nice airfield. Scenery is marvellous too :ok:

Smithy

Bigears 5th Apr 2010 12:30

I second Captain Smithys experience- at Oban yesterday and was pleasantly surprised after what I'd previously heard. :D

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 5th Apr 2010 12:43

<<Redhill ('ATC' think they are at Heathrow)>>

Bit of an insult to Heathrow methinks.....

verticalhold 5th Apr 2010 13:14

Someone said Elstree. Mick's bite is far worse than his bark, Actually he's a great bloke and I won't have many words said against him! (known the daft b***er for years and he is a really good sort.)

I just don't uderstand how Elstree can justify their latest trick of a 100% levy for landing fees paid by credit card. I went the other day, landing fee £50 paid by Mastercard and got charged double for using plastic.

Its about time someone shot the senile old t*** who has the lease and did something about making Elstree more attractive to GA.
VH

jxc 5th Apr 2010 13:25

I think the redhill ATC have watched PUSHING TIN a little to much :E

JW411 5th Apr 2010 13:59

I have to say that the last time I visited Redhill (in a C206) my day job was flying DC-10s based in JFK.

From the politeness point of view, ATC at Redhill made their New York compatriots sound like boyscouts.

I have never been back (to Redhill, that is).

DC10RealMan 5th Apr 2010 14:46

I had a similar experience at Redhill in a twin when I upset someone and they made me taxi the long way round the airfield to the parking stand at £250/hour (10 years ago) W*****S!!!
Never been back since.

lupomen 5th Apr 2010 16:11

Handling at Ronaldsway IOM
 
Handling on the South Side of the airport i.e. Manx Flyers is not now and has never been mandatory, you just need to make an arrangement to pay your landing fee with finance prior to departure.

GK430 5th Apr 2010 16:43

PPR - Why oh Why?
Used to work at one of the U.K.'s larger airfields. You cannot turn traffic away unless you are slot restricted or put out a notam /AIC due to an event or similar.

What is getting into these people requiring this that and the next thing.
Fully appreciate the need to ensure we can be briefed over noise sensitive areas etc. and hazards, but so much already online if you do your homework.

It's getting daft - so much so, I went off over a CAS free area at Alt. and decided to land nowhere for an hour and a half and then go back to base - hassle free and fabulous:D

niknak 5th Apr 2010 17:06

Airbusboy,

don't worry aout MadJock and A & C, they talk of a time (many years ago) when every visitor had to go through the terminal building, both have always had another agenda which they've never been able to publicly justify, I don't know why.
That doesn't happen anymore, just ensure that you are handled by Saxonair (0845 155 6222) and you get great service, a cheaper landing fee and free coffee, tea and sticky buns, with none of the nause of full security checks which are imposed upon the normal travelling public.

easy307 5th Apr 2010 17:44

Lupoman,
So where do you ask to park at IoM if not handled by Manxflyers ?
It's tricky to get to the northside to pay the relevant person.

gg190 5th Apr 2010 19:45


Handling on the South Side of the airport i.e. Manx Flyers is not now and has never been mandatory, you just need to make an arrangement to pay your landing fee with finance prior to departure.
This is true, handling is not required (unless using the main apron), however the airport website states the following:

"Outside of the RZ (main apron) there is no compulsory handing regime on the rest of the airfield, but an airfield tenant or club will have to accept the visitor."

So unless you know somebody who is an airfield tenant, you have to use Island Aviation or Manx Flyers. While it is possible to pay your landing fee directly to finance in the main terminal I am led to believe they only accept cheques or cash.

mad_jock 5th Apr 2010 20:21

I don't have an agenda, just got royally shaft by those idiots in the terminal. As we discussed by PM.

Also as well the airspace grab is taking the piss. And the thousands of pounds spent on it would have been better spent on tarmac so your taxiways are in better condition than the access road to the local caravan park.

Any GA movements into to Norwich are self defeating to the GA cause as it only hinders the arguments for the refusal of the CAS.


3.2 Of the 537 responses from individuals or organisations not on the consultation
list, all except 3 objected to the proposal. It is unusual to receive such a large
number of responses from a particular sub-set of the aviation community which,
from the initial analysis appeared to be based on objections to common issues.
Indeed it appears that this might have been an orchestrated campaign against
the proposal (through corporate websites and other means) outside the accepted
process for consultation promulgated by the CAA. It should be noted that the
national representative organisations of all aviation interests are formal consultee
organisations by virtue of their membership of the CAA’s National Air Traffic
Management Advisory Committee (NATMAC). This apparent action outside the
recognised consultation process is the subject of further evaluation and
discussion with the CAA.
Is an exert from the consultation process. Obviously nobody at Norwich considered the fact that the reason why they only got 3 postive replys was because it was stupid idea in the first place.

And it should also be blacklisted because I believe its one of the few airfields which charges for emergency diversions. Although they proberly changed that when they went for CAS to try and show they are GA friendly

There are lots of GA fields in the Norwich area I am sure if you post which aircraft type your planning to arrive in, a local will tell you which one is most suitable. but you can't go wrong with Seething I reckon. Even if you need to get into town is cheaper getting a taxi than the landing and handling at Norwich.

flybymike 5th Apr 2010 23:28

They are not all bad; they welcome arrivals by caravan airship...

India Four Two 6th Apr 2010 05:28


I just don't uderstand how Elstree can justify their latest trick of a 100% levy for landing fees paid by credit card.
LL,

I suggest you ask for a refund of the levy from your credit card company and tell them that this is Elstree's policy. Charging extra for using a card is not allowed under their agreement with Visa/Mastercard.

lupomen 6th Apr 2010 05:54

Re parking IOM
 
You may park on the south side apron around the edges, a phone call to finance should enable you to pay landing/parking fees by post or they sometimes send security to do the necessary. It is not necessary with a little forward planning to pay a ridiculous amount of money for handling, a questionable service in relation to GA at the best of times !!

good flying.

Oldpilot55 6th Apr 2010 17:09

I think Panshanger should be removed from the blacklist on the grounds that it has a really good cafe (based on all of one visit). The guy we thought was coming over to bollock us was merely interested in our plane. We did get a comment for not wearing hiviz but clearly they had seen us without.

niknak 6th Apr 2010 17:47

Mad Jock

1. by all means object to the CAS proposal, but I don't think that that's what this post is all about, besides which it would appear that you have latched onto the LAA approach which led to many objections based upon supposition, not fact.

2. When I PM'd you I offered to assist with your percieved problem by asking you to forward facts, you turned me down flat which leads me to believe that it was just that - a perception.

3. Admittedly we did join the Strasser Scheme late, but equally we've never ever charged anyone for an emergency landing, prove me wrong.

It's unfortunate that you choose to base your opinions of one airport upon whatever may or may not have taken place, by all means spout forth but at least have give yourself some credibility by backing your statements up with facts.

Capn Kangaroo 6th Apr 2010 19:29


Someone said Elstree. Mick's bite is far worse than his bark, Actually he's a great bloke and I won't have many words said against him! (known the daft b***er for years and he is a really good sort.)
Sadly I've been there when he's chewed out a newly qualified young lady pilot, (very very low hours) because she made a simple mistake on the radio ... he shouted at her so loudly that you could hear her welling up in the cockpit, all of this was inside 2 mile final

I think she handled the landing well, but it could have gone so badly wrong for her :(

I've also heard him on the radio shouting "EVERYONE SHUT UP" when trying to request radio silence to deal with what turned out to be a radio failure on an inbound aircraft ... now I don't think that's particularly standard phraseology

Personally, I've voted with my feet and gone to Denham where the RT is relaxed and friendly, oh and the circuits are considerably smaller .. I now even base my aircraft there. Its about 2 minutes further to drive, but tbh the service is 200% better so its definitely worth it!

I've seen several letters of complaint raised by tenants at the airfield over the years complaining about professionalism of radio / etc .. so far to date Mr Holder seems to not care (although I do appreciate finding anyone patient enough to sit on the radio at a "small" aerodrome has got to be difficult so they're probably going to find it hard to replace him if they tried) :(

Capn Kangaroo 6th Apr 2010 19:38


It is not necessary with a little forward planning to pay a ridiculous amount of money for handling, a questionable service in relation to GA at the best of times !!
I confess I was under the impression handling was mandatory at EGNS ... and having just flown back from there today, having paid my £53 for an approach, parking - and "handling" (for them to fail to fax my GAR to all the right places) I'm somewhat peeved ..

Mind you if you fly there regularly enough I think you can pay £185/year (plus £185 joining fee) and they'll waive the handling charges ... joy!

Nice bunch of guys, just sodding expensive :(

PENNINE BOY 6th Apr 2010 20:34

EGNS
 
If you fly to Ronaldsway on a regular basis, phone the finance dept and buy a block of landings, you can then park on the south side and self handle :D

ak7274 6th Apr 2010 20:37

niknak,
you state that the LAA has based it's objections on suppositions and not fact. I have looked back at the Norwich proposals and guess what?......the majority of that is supposition too.. not fact. We expect.... based upon........etc isn't fact. Sorry I was also angered by their accusation that my objection was part of a conspiracy and complained to the CAA about it. They weren't quoting facts then either.

mad_jock 6th Apr 2010 20:37

This is a thread is about a Blacklist of airports which for what ever reason people think GA should avoid.

I suggest people avoid Norwich because I was an unsatisfied customer. You as an employee of the Airport and a none pilot come back and say ignore those pilots they don't know what they are talking about after never having been subjected yourself to the Norwich airport experence yourself. I will grant you that you will have been on flights but your a known face and have an airside pass. Then you imply that we (the pilots that say blacklist it) have a super secret agenda. Which when in reality we just think the place is poor value for money and a pain in the backside to operate into.

No where have we said ATC is a problem.

The CAS issue you obviously will have a different opinion on to the pilots cause you want it and the majority of pilots think its an airspace grab. Your hosting of a BBC film crew for the day to be honest will have cermented I think most pilots resolve on this matter. I haven't a clue what the LAA have published on the subject of CAS. I base my views on personal experence along with my nomination for black listing the airport.

twelveoclockhigh 6th Apr 2010 21:00

Niknak

Well done to the airport for joining the strasser scheme but it is about diversions not emergency landings - and they have charged for diversions in the past.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:42.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.