Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Operating limits imposed at Blackbushe.

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Operating limits imposed at Blackbushe.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jul 2003, 15:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dogmersfield, Hampshire, UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Operating limits imposed at Blackbushe.

On the 9th of July the management at Blackbushe issued their Bulletin No: 148 headed "New Limits of Operation at Blackbushe Airport"

It reads:

"We have been advised by the CAA, Safety Regs Group that the following limits for operation should apply.

Take off
There should be an 800' minimum cloud base and 1000 meters visibility.

Landing
There should be an 800' minimum cloudbase and minimum visibility of 1000 metres.

The point of this posting is not so much to debate the limits but to ask if any other airfield has been similarly restricted. We are told that these imposed restrictions are the result of the very sad fatal KingAir crash a couple of years back.

Surely if something is learned from such a disaster then any recommendations or restrictions would need to be nationwide?
John Varndell is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2003, 15:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: EGLL mostly
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A number of fields are either having imposed (or are self-imposing) limits in line their SMS Safety Cases.

Cranfield is an example that was debated here a while ago. They have elected to impose a departure RVR limit of 800metres. The justification is that the airfield perimeter is not secure and therefore it is wise to impose a restriction that gives the ATCO some reasonable chance of verifying that the runway is unobstructed before clearing an aircraft to take-off.

It seems to me though that this is all a bit heavy handed. If a field drops below its published minima (and there is nothing wrong with having them), then it should become unlicensed, and the risk and liabilty is assumed by the aircraft operator. I feel this strongly for departures. Arrivals at a VFR field like Blackbushe is a rather more difficult call.

Charlie.
CSX001 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2003, 18:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South East UK
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who will be responsible for measuring the 800ft base and 1000m visibility, what are their qualifications, and will the weather records be recorded and available for inspection?
panjandrum is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2003, 20:01
  #4 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does not the circuit height and the propable lack of an instrument approach procedure already mean such limits are in force at any airfield?
 
Old 22nd Jul 2003, 20:40
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dogmersfield, Hampshire, UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cloud base will be determined by nearby Farnborough with 100 ft deducted. The bulletin does not give any clues as to how the visibility will be assessed.

Yes the circuit height is 800 ft at Blackbushe but during the PPL training we fly 500 ft "Bad weather circuits".

But why have the CAA singled out Blackbushe because of one incident??
John Varndell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.