Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Two charts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2003, 05:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK, London
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two charts?

Hi

I didnt get round replying to my other threads, but I have read them and thanks to all the people who have replied, it was helpful.

Another question now... Im planning on getting a quarter mill chart so i can have that beside the half mill one. The half mill will remain the primary method for navigating. I think the quarter mill might help with checking that im on track because of more detailed features depicted on the chart which you dont get on the half mill one.

What are your opinions? How many charts do you carry? Will carrying a second one distract me from navigating efficiently, or will it be of assistance to navigation?

P16
Pilot16 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2003, 05:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1/4 mil is very handy for finding your way round E.Anglia, but I've recently gone back to 1/2 mil for other places.

I seem to have a terrible need to be able to follow progress with my finger on a chart, and the 1/4 mil makes that more attractive. I don't think it's terribly good practice, and really want to get back to holding a heading for a decent few minutes, then making adjustments.

Steve R
SteveR is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2003, 12:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1/4 mil is useful around congested & complicated airspace. 1/2 saves you having to swap charts all the time.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2003, 16:55
  #4 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never used the UK 1/4-mill charts.

But I have used the US Terminal Area charts, which are 1/4-mill. Not entirely sure that they really helped me at all compared to the Sectionals (1/2-mill), but they are a legal requirement so I used them.

Having come from an environment where I got very used to using 1/2-mill charts, I have to admit to getting confused more than once. No problem when planning a trip in advance, creating a plog and following the plog. The problem is when you just "go flying", making up the route as you go, estimating distances on the chart. Once or twice I "forgot" which chart I was using, and estimated distances as if I were using a 1/2-mill chart. Which resulted in me going twice as far as I should have gone, and then wondering why I'd overshot my intended turning point by so much.

My personal advice would be not to bother. But if you do go for them, then use them regularly, you'll only confuse yourself if you keep them for occassional use.

FFF
-------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2003, 16:56
  #5 (permalink)  
PPruNaholic!
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buckinghamshire
Age: 61
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bought a 1/4 mil chart once, when training, to see what was on it but have always used the 1/2 mil by preference - as others have said, less need to change maps so frequently. Exception being in Australia where you have to use the 1/4 mil charts (forget what they call them, VNC or TNC?) when in major city's airspace.

Andy
Aussie Andy is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2003, 17:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love 1/2 mils. I always think if its on the map you can definately see it on the ground (apart from Bagshot Mast - I wish they would paint a nice big yellow square next to it).

I always found the 1/4 mils too fussy with too much info on them and ground features you couldn't see. They may have changed recently but that was my memory. Also you run out of map too quickly on long cross countries.

I agree with the comment about the US terminal charts, they are great although its hard to remember a thumb is only 5 miles, not 10. I believe they are going to produce similar charts for the London area soon.
18greens is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2003, 20:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It depends on the speed of your airplane, and the distances you are flying. In slow, really slow airplanes, a 1/4 mil makes sense.

On the other hand I used to find a 1 mil chart more useable for long flights, say 600nm.

Now I stick to 1/2 mil. There certainly is a chance of error in swapping scales, as there is in using a ruler with mulltiscales.
bluskis is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2003, 21:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An eccentric cove in the WW2 Air Transport Auxillary by the name of Douglas Fairweather was familiar with England and Scotland to such a degree, that he had no use for the clutter of charts of any scale and declined to carry them.

When rebuked by the Ministerial Bods for violating standing orders, he henceforth flew with one token chart: A map of Roman Britain.

Worked for him.
Algy's Monocle is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2003, 00:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I now prefer the 1/4 mil chart especially when flying in Scotland. This preference came about because when I was struggling a little with my navigation my instructor decided it was because I was using a 1/2 mil chart. Once using the 1/4 mil chart my navigation rapidly improved. I will start using a 1/4 mil chart in the South East when the one I have on order arrives. On my QXC I took both the 1/4 mil and the half mil charts because of how one destination appeared on the 1/4 mil chart.
Charts are down to personal preference but you should make sure you keep at least 1 up to date and carry the up to date chart with you even if you are mainly using the other chart since there will be times when you will want to make sure you are using current information
HelenD is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2003, 01:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,674
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
maps

I use a 1/2 mill. for nav., but if you are looking for particular turning points ie, pub, telephone box,etc then scan the 1/4 mil. and cut it to A5 and stick it alongside the point, for the greater detail. You can go further and use a 1:50 th map in the same way, and you can get it in colour off "multimap",and the picture as well.
sycamore is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.