Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Too fast, too much, too soon? New PPL > complex conversion.

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Too fast, too much, too soon? New PPL > complex conversion.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2003, 18:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Horsham UK
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it kinda depends not only on the individual but on the conversion taking place

IMHO most people would have little problem in converting from say an Archer to an Arrow (the numbers are simple just add 10 kts) you have the fun of wobbly props and up and down wheels - it honestly doesn't take too long to figure out...

If on the other hand your going from say a 152 to a Bonanza or Mooney then clearly its going to take a bit more thinking about and training time (just speeding up thought processes to stay ahead of the aircraft for a start)

Having said that I know of one bloke who was blatting around in an Arrow pre PPL with no worries and another bloke who has quite a bit of time but is having trouble coping with the extra complexity.
Ace Rimmer is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2003, 18:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Herts
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found the conversion from Cessna 150 to 182 reasonably straight forward.....and all that extra room!!!!!It's certainly heavier, whereby after my 10th circuit on the trot, I had a left arm like popeye.(my instructor was quick to point out that I was a fool for not making full use of the trim
Lemoncake is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2003, 00:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
planes which were gradually falling apart ... doing well to have one working radio, with the rest of the panel defunct ... this typical-UK-GA scene
Not a pretty picture. Sounds like there is an urgent need for new airplane construction in the UK. Homebuilts are all very well, but could they resurrect de Havilland, Percival, or one of the great firms of the past (we don't need any more spam cans or plastic slippers)?
MLS-12D is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2003, 01:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say that this is not just a UK problem. The state of the avionics in rental planes at KCDW, are if anything, worse: making instrument flight positively unpleasurable. For example, of the 2 PA28’s I fly, only one has a reliable VOR (just the one), but it doesn’t have a reliable DME. It’s the reverse with the other (ie an unreliable VOR, but a reasonable DME). At least with the warrior for rent at EGKH, the instruments are in reasonable condition.

The problem is not with the sad state of our aircraft construction industry, but the general cost of flying, and what people are prepared to pay for it – ie because the costs are so high, most of us are only prepared to pay the absolute minimum - which results in rentals with just the basics.

It is an interesting philosophical point that while the Yanks earn loads more than the Brits, and the cost of flying is easily half due to cheap gas, they too are only prepared to pay the minimum, which to us Brits is relatively dirt cheap…
KCDW is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2003, 04:24
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brighton
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MLS-12D & KCDW

There isn't a shortage of new planes; in fact quite a number of interesting and "sexy" designs have appeared recently, note the 4-seater DA40 for example and too many 2-seater composites for me to keep track of.

The problem is the lack of students. As KCDW absolutely rightly points out, the decline being in the USA too shows that it isn't anything much to do with cost (whereas the UK flight training industry keeps laboriously pretending it is).

So, what keeps people away? Why are most of the pilots who still hang in there middle aged and often a lot older than that? There is a vast number of men, and some women too, in their 20s and 30s who earn £40k-£60k but few of them choose to learn to fly.

It's another subject, but basically anyone with the money to pursue a significantly time/money-consuming leisure activity is looking to buy into a useful social scene. And there isn't any, in GA, really...

The state of the aircraft is several stages down the road from the primary problem.
IO540-C4D5D is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2003, 04:35
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello IO540-C4D5D
quite a number of interesting and "sexy" designs have appeared recently, note the 4-seater DA40 for example and too many 2-seater composites for me to keep track of
Agreed, but as I said we don't need any more composite 'glass slippers' (I fully acknowledge that many people would disagree with that view).

KCDW, you're perfectly right: I have flown some rather questionable airplanes in the USA (presumably reflecting the relatively loose airworthiness standards under part 91 of the FARs).

In my very limited experience, Australia seems to have quite a few newish aircraft for hire.
MLS-12D is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2003, 05:51
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi

Newish aircraft can be hired for reasonable money, but peeps expect to fly quality aircraft for peanuts and that is unfortunately not possible.

You can hire a new (less than one year old just 100 hrs on the clock) DR400 at Turweston with more avionics than you can shake a stick at; £135 per hour on the Hobbs.

Pilot Flight Training do a nearly new C172S for £115 per hour (again Hobbs)

At Connington you can fly a very nicely equipped Seneca 2 for less than £200 per hour.

OK it is all a bit more expensive than the cheapest of cheap but not extortionate.

As always in life: You pays your money and make your choice.

FD
Flyin'Dutch' is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2003, 15:15
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brighton
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MLS-12D

One may not need glass slippers but what IS needed is modern-looking aircraft (by which I don't mean new Cessnas) because Joe Public's perception of this business is getting close to a vintage car rally! And it is Joe Public where new pilots come out from. There isn't some special "pilots DNA pool" out there

FlyinDutch

I know of businesses who have tried to operate brand new Cessnas but they got few customers, in a location where old heaps can be hired for say £20/hr less. I expect the reason is that after years of neglect the bottom has dropped out of the GA market. Otherwise, as you suggest, there would be different quality customers at different price levels. It would be interesting to see how one did operating (training in, and renting out) a fully modern fleet, at a location where there isn't competition from 1970 C150s.
IO540-C4D5D is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2003, 20:39
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Great White North
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was in Stuart, Florida a couple of months ago, and one of the FBOs at the airport had just purchased a few brand-new 172s, with the intention of offering basic flight instruction to the well-healed non-pilot owners of private jets based there.

Personally, I would rather save approx. C$50 per hour and fly a less well-equipped (but still in decent shape) 172N; I don't see much benefit from fancy GPS, fuel injection, and whatever other bells and whistles the new models feature. However, certainly the intended customers have the cash, and they probably won't mind paying a bit extra for the privilege of flying a new, well-appointed aircraft. After all, if you can operate your own Challenger, renting a 172 isn't going to seem like much, no matter how new the model.
Canadian Luscombe is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2003, 20:44
  #30 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised to hear that there's not much demand for newish aircraft.

I occassionally hire a C172, which is a couple of years old, from White Waltham, to keep my instrument skills in practice. The last time I tried to book it (the only one), it was fully booked every weekend for the next 5 weeks! A bit of a problem, since the club's currency rules is 4 weeks on type!!! This is despite the fact that they also have several PA28s which are older but cheaper.

Mind you, people who are looking for the cheapest flying possible generally don't rent from White Waltham to start with I suppose.

FFF
--------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2003, 06:05
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The rash of C172 hirers might have wanted the high wing for sightseeing purposes, in preference to the PA28? I certainly would.
Tinstaafl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.