Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

EUROPA XS vs VANS RV6/9

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

EUROPA XS vs VANS RV6/9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Mar 2003, 08:27
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone have experience working with aluminium and composite materials in aircraft construction? What material will be the best option in the long run?

How reliable is the Rotax engine on the Europa?

On the VANS RV9, would a Lycoming or Wilksh diesel engine be the best option? (purchase price, overhauls, fuel consumption, reliability etc.)
EchoKiloEcho is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2003, 16:37
  #22 (permalink)  
Rod1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Had a long conversation with PFA engineering on the subject of engine reliability. To say they spoke highly of the Rotax would be an understatement. Apparently the relatively small number of failures has mostly been caused by bad maintenance. The Rotax has a lot of light alloy, and the max torque setting for a lot of the bolts is very low. Several failures have been caused by over tightening various bolts.

As an engine design it is much more modern than the Lycoming. It’s water-cooled heads prevent shock cooling and it is light and fuel-efficient. I do not understand why it is not fitted with electronic ignition, but the rest of it is pretty good.

The Diesels are an unknown quantity and the Vans organisation has no interest in supporting them. I suspect that in 5 to 10 years these engines will be the way to go but I was not prepared to be a first wave guinea-pig.
 
Old 7th Mar 2003, 22:15
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like to reply as an instructor who has been forced into being current on a mono wheel europa.

They are utter ****, bordering on very dangerous.

Maybe i have been lacking in my dodgy aircraft exposure.
But the thing is horrible in a x-wind.

It isn't a tail dragger (or dosn't handel like one).

it spins round on the mono wheel and it will bite.

The only other PFA aircraft which is more scary is the "flying turd outa INV" which stalls 10knts below its cruise speed.

MJ
mad_jock is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2003, 00:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bristol and Forest of Dean
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MJ

The only other PFA aircraft which is more scary is the "flying turd outa INV" which stalls 10knts below its cruise speed.
Sorry mate kinda lost me there - what aircraft were you referring to...??

Kingy
Kingy is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2003, 18:27
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a PFA inspector I get to see a few aircraft and the Vans types are almost allways built to a very high standard.
The vans seems to be a well "sorted" aircraft and you will not get any surprizes if you buy one second hand ( if you can find one!).

All composite aircraft are much harder to inspect for damage so it is vital that if you are thinking of buying one second hand take a PFA inspector who knows the type along to to help you look at it , this advice is good for all composite aircraft and not just the Europa.

If I was in the market for one of these aircraft I would probably buy the Vans due to the metal construction but I prefer my light aircraft made out of wood bt that is another debate !.
A and C is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.