Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Forgot How To Work A Crp5!!


Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Forgot How To Work A Crp5!!

Old 26th February 2003 | 20:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: all over the place
Unhappy Forgot How To Work A Crp5!!

Help!

I tried to answer this question using a CRP5 and keep getting -19 degrees centigrade.........

You are flying in a Standard ISA atmosphere at 30'000 at Mach 0.84 what is your ISA TAT?

Now if I use the formula TAT=SAT(1+0.2kMsqrd)

SAT = 15-(30 * 2)= -45 in Kelvin = 228(1+0.2(1)((0.84)sqrd))=260
so 260-273 (I'm assuming a perfect probe for value k=1)

I get -13 degrees centrigrade.........can someone talk me through doing it on the CRP5?

Thanks in advance,
BUDGIE
BUDGIE is offline  
Old 26th February 2003 | 21:35
  #2 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
From: Sarfend-on-Sea
Unfortunately my CRP-5 is at work, so I cannot confirm figures, but I can tell you how to solve the problem.

ISA at 30,000 is -44°C.
Find the Mach number index in the 'Airspeed' window of the CRP-5, and align with -44°C
Read from Mach 0.84 on the inner scale to TAS on the outer scale.
Find that TAS on the blue 'temperature rise' scale in the middle of the CRP-5 (it is calibrated TAS against temperature rise) and read off the appropriate ram rise
Add the result to -44°C

All the best
Send Clowns
Gen Nav instructor
BCFT
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 27th February 2003 | 12:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: all over the place
Thanks Send Clowns,

I have been doing exactly what you say but my CRP-5 keeps returning an answer of -18 degrees. I have sat with two other guys trying to get this but to no avail. Whats the probability of me having a dodgy CRP-5 I wonder

-44 in the Airspeed window against Mach 0.84 gives my CRP a TAS of 494 Temp Rise for 494kts is 26degrees so -44+26=-18degrees quite a way off from the formula answer of -13 degrees.
I am sure my maths in the formula is correct?

Could someone possibly check this on their CRP5 and tell me what they get? I'd really appreciate it!

Thanks
BUDGIE

Hey all,

I really don't understand the logic of putting this question in the Private Flying Forum? No dis-respect but there isn't too many PPL's needing to calculate ram rise temps at 30'000ft etc.....
However, if there are any PPL's out there who like working out this kind of thing and are possibly doing this under the JAA then can you check it out?
Really think this is more suited to Questions - but hey I ain't a moderator!

Cheers
BUDGIE
BUDGIE is offline  
Old 27th February 2003 | 14:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: lots of different places....
I get -17 +/- 1 degrees on my CRP5. So I don't think your one is out if at all. If you vary K in the formula to between 0.8 and 0.9 you'll find you'll get an answer between -19 and -16.

Last edited by Cool_Hand; 27th February 2003 at 16:27.
Cool_Hand is offline  
Old 27th February 2003 | 15:25
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
With a TAS of 494kts I get a ram rise of 32°, which with k=1 gives a TAT of -13°C on my CRP5 (ISA 30,000' -45°C).

I recon the only way of getting a RR of 26° is setting a TAS of roughly 444 kts, or your CR5 is misaligned

Last edited by Voidhawk; 27th February 2003 at 15:42.
Voidhawk is offline  
Old 27th February 2003 | 16:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: lots of different places....
Just out of mild concern over my CRP5, voidhawk, on your temp rise part of the CRP is:

200 kts just over 4 C
400 kts just below 17 C
700 kts just over 51 C

as for a 32 C rise I need a speed of 540+ kts.
Cool_Hand is offline  
Old 27th February 2003 | 19:38
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
Those figures seem to be for a temperature probe with a recovery factor of 0.8. I.e. measuring SAT + 80% RR.

So in our case the 0.8 probe would show a RAT of -19°C, sensing 80% of the RR (26°), giving a SAT of -45°C.

The 1.0 probe would show a RAT of -13°C, sensing 100% of the RR (32°), also giving us a SAT of -45°C.

Well that's my theory, anyway.
Voidhawk is offline  
Old 28th February 2003 | 16:50
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: all over the place
Hey peeps,

My CRP5 agrees with Cool_Hands!
However, I am concerned.....the CRP5 assumes recovery of 1. We have to compensate if it's any less so the CRP5 should give us very close to what the formula does.
Is everyone in agreement with my figures for the formula?
Can I ask any wizzes with the CRP5 and JAA ATPL's students to do this sum on the CRP5 and give us their answers?
This seems very odd

BUDGIE
BUDGIE is offline  
Old 28th February 2003 | 18:23
  #9 (permalink)  
BRL
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: Brighton. UK. (Via Liverpool).
However, if there are any PPL's out there who like working out this kind of thing and are possibly doing this under the JAA then can you check it out?
That is why I have left it here for now as I know a few ppl's who are doing the JAA who can maybe help you.
BRL is offline  
Old 28th February 2003 | 18:30
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
What I meant was that yours and Cool_Hand's CRP's seem to assume a recovery factor of 0.8 when calculating sensed RR. Using the formula with a k=0.8 you get Cool_Hand's figures.

You've used a recovery factor of 1.0 in your formula, that's why you get the difference.

My CRP assumes a recovery factor of 1.0.
Voidhawk is offline  
Old 28th February 2003 | 18:38
  #11 (permalink)  

Official PPRuNe Chaplain
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
From: Witnesham, Suffolk
My CRP doesn't know what you lot are talking about. Or I don't, or both.

My CRP has a Mach No arrow in one of the windows, but I never went fast enough to need it. I couldn't find anything about OAT associated with that. Maybe mine's the older, slower, lower CRP?

My Jeppie calculator does all sorts of clever things, but you have to know how to drive them, and I never cracked that bit.
Keef is offline  
Old 28th February 2003 | 23:37
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: all over the place
BRL,

Ah but now I know why you are a moderator and I'm not, you sent it to where it'd get responded to positively and I'd probably have put it in Rumours and News solely cause I'm biased in this particular case.

Cheers
BUDGIE

p.s. I'll buy you a pint or two if ever we meet for questioning your judgement guess I've taken MCC a stage too far
BUDGIE is offline  
Old 4th March 2003 | 22:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Talking

I'm with Keef; I have no idea what this discussion is all about.

No worries though: the chance of me ever "flying at 30'000 at Mach 0.84" is remote at best.

It's questions like this that say to me: "you know, you really don't want to do an IR".
MLS-12D is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.