Humidity
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: London
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Humidity
Carb Ice is the insidious heart-stopper for normally aspirated PPL's, and yet despite the informative Safety Sense Leaflets there does not appear to be any met info on humidity, and so no way to relate it to temperature on the carb ice incidence graph.
Or am I missing something?
Or am I missing something?
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To calculate the humidity you require 'wet bulb' temperature readings as well as the (dry bulb) temp given on METARs so there is no way of calculating the % humidity, save calling the tower after the readings have been taken and asking for the figures. A table is then needed to calculate humidity.
NB It is important not to confuse 'wet bulb temp' with dew point, the dew point is the lowest point at which saturated air can be cooled without condensation to water. It is a theoretical calculation based on 100% Relative Humidity.
NB It is important not to confuse 'wet bulb temp' with dew point, the dew point is the lowest point at which saturated air can be cooled without condensation to water. It is a theoretical calculation based on 100% Relative Humidity.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Humidity will vary very locally, take cloud, showers, vicinity of ocean, lakes, rivers.
It is also what happens in your particular airplane venturi which matters, so the advice covers the whole wide range of possible ice forming scenarios.
Expect carb icing in the range of temperatures given in the pamphlets. Your engine instruments should warn you when it is happening.
It is also what happens in your particular airplane venturi which matters, so the advice covers the whole wide range of possible ice forming scenarios.
Expect carb icing in the range of temperatures given in the pamphlets. Your engine instruments should warn you when it is happening.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina, USA, Planet Earth
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In response to one specific aspect of your question, if one has temperature and dewpoint information, RH can be calculated.
Here is a calculator that claims to make the conversion:
http://www.mcwar.org/humid.html
but I cannot vouch for its accuracy.
Still, as Bluskis points out, the information is on little value for carburetor ice purposes.
Here is a calculator that claims to make the conversion:
http://www.mcwar.org/humid.html
but I cannot vouch for its accuracy.
Still, as Bluskis points out, the information is on little value for carburetor ice purposes.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I do carb ice checks regularly and don't worry too much about the actual probability.
So long as you're checking frequently enough it shouldn't really matter to you, should it?
So long as you're checking frequently enough it shouldn't really matter to you, should it?
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dorset, UK
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When flying in the UK, I have a simple rule:-
ALWAYS assume that it is carb icing weather!
Last summer it was proved to me, just how local carb icing conditions can be:-
Flying across the English Channel in almost CAVOK, when in mid channel, port engine showed definite signs of carb icing, that cleared with carb air to hot. Starboard engine showed no signs of carb icing whatsoever. This was in a type that is not very prone to carb icing.
ALWAYS assume that it is carb icing weather!
Last summer it was proved to me, just how local carb icing conditions can be:-
Flying across the English Channel in almost CAVOK, when in mid channel, port engine showed definite signs of carb icing, that cleared with carb air to hot. Starboard engine showed no signs of carb icing whatsoever. This was in a type that is not very prone to carb icing.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: London
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the information but the point I was trying to make was that humidity info is not readily available and wondered if there was sufficient need for it to be included in TAFS or METARS? Only then could the carb ice graph be practically applied.
PPruNaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buckinghamshire
Age: 61
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The UK five day forecasts on the Flying High Aviation Weather website here include forecasts of humidity at various altitudes.
Also, as others have said, METARs give temp / dew point - if these two numbers are close together, humidity is high. If they are the same, then it is 100%!
Andy
Also, as others have said, METARs give temp / dew point - if these two numbers are close together, humidity is high. If they are the same, then it is 100%!
Andy
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Am I missing something?
Jeffrey wrote:
How about temperature and dewpoint in the METARS?
Seems a good starter, dont you think?
FD
Thanks for the information but the point I was trying to make was that humidity info is not readily available and wondered if there was sufficient need for it to be included in TAFS or METARS
Seems a good starter, dont you think?
FD
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: St Albans, herts, UK
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Temperature and dewpoint are stated in METARS and ATIS (if available). On the horizontal axis of the Carb Icing chart is temperature, on the vertical axis dewpoint.
Therefore using temperature, dewpoint and the chart you can determine the risk of carb icing and the relative humidity.
Or am I missing something....?
Therefore using temperature, dewpoint and the chart you can determine the risk of carb icing and the relative humidity.
Or am I missing something....?