Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Cessna 152 gets in the way!

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Cessna 152 gets in the way!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd August 2002 | 07:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 111
Likes: 1
From: just left of a valley,dorsetestishireland
Cessna 152 gets in the way!

Picture this!

Weymouth carnival, lovely day, lovely sea, lovely ice creams, lovely ladies , Harrier GR7 in the distance on its run in to display for the suntanned masses. In it comes, loads of knots - wwwhhhaaattt a Cessna 150 steadily flying over the display area in the bay at 250 ft !! same height as the harrier now rapidly approaching the rear of the Cessna!!! Harrier guy flew straight past very-very close! Harrier guy does a 360 and flies straight past them again !! Should have shot the Cessna down for being such dimwits.
Weymouth is covered by Plymouth Mil, so I dont know what went on there ?
Harrier completed the display and zoomed off, probably to look for the witdims!!
coley chaos is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 11:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: North Weald, UK
Picture this (2)

North Weald Air Show 199?.

BBMF are strutting their stuff - the Hurricane is on display and flying up RWY 20. Suddenly it peels up and starts to orbit to the North because...there is a German registered Robin/spam-can/thingie on finals for RWY02.

The D-XXXX eventually decides that further progress is Not A Good Move and sort of breaks right back towards the Fatherland and the show continues.

I couldn't help but feel that is was 'right place, but 50 years too late.'
Who has control? is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 11:56
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 279
Likes: 20
From: Ludlow, England
Red face

An airfield in the South East last year. A BBMF Spitfire has been booked to give a flypast.

The time approaches, so flying club decamps onto grass outside clubhouse to watch the fun.

The Mk XIX Spitfire is turning base and a club Cessna 152 starts dragging itself along the grass runway and takes off.

Spitfire hurtles down runway at low level, underneath the 152, does a steep climbing turn crosswind, then comes back for second pass.

Don't know if they'd be willing to do another this year though!

RD
Rallye Driver is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 16:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Bath
coley chaos

This isn't an excuse, but from the notams...

RAC : FROM 02/08/02 11:00 TO 02/09/02 07:00 U1698/02
E)PLYMOUTH MILITARY RADAR LARS NOT AVBL

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 18:00
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 21
From: Used to be God's own County
Civvies don't read NOTAMs, so dimwit would not have known LArs was unavailable!
Sweeping statement but I hear it every weekend......for example...any Brize 134.3 controllers around?
Last weekend saw civvies flying through para drop sites, into their zone etc etc.
Same with Farnborough and its TRA for the show, Reds Temp Airspace, Brighton Political Party conferences - the list is endless.
I was using Brize for a listening watch during flying at Charlbury and could not believe the ignorance of some people.
Many 'pro' civvy pilots out there but unfortunately there seem to be more dunces!!!
No excuse for not reading the notams considering the abundance of software that will print it all out on a pretty map for you.
EESDL is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 20:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Bath
I agree that not enough people read NOTAMS, but as of yesterday (or perhaps today) the pretty map stuff doesn't work anymore. AIS have changed their site.

It's back to reading the text for now

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 21:06
  #7 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
Moderator
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1997
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 21
From: Europe
EESDL

Whilst the point you make is valid, there are quite a few Airprox reports over the years where mil crews seem to have infringed notified CANPs and the like and come close to civil traffic going about their business. Are we to assume all mil pilots don't read CANPs ??

Your generalisation is far too broad.
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 21:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: UK
I only have one thing to say,

Ian S, was it extreme coincidence or are you a NOTAM spotter, I'm actually quite worried at the thought you could recall everyone for recent history.....

ps if that is the case maybe you could fly with me and then I could say "I never bong anything..."

Talk Reaction is offline  
Old 22nd August 2002 | 22:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: Northants, UK
I've listened in to several highly amusing conversations over the years where pilots have been utterly unaware of NOTAMed airspace.

Old Warden - a C150 asking to land, only to be told 'Er, I'd rather you didn't. There's a Harrier about to depart' - this on a well publicised display day.

Or Flying Legends at Duxford, shortly before the big formation at the end, some bloke asking to fly through overhead. '30 assorted warbirds in the overhead, advise staying clear' - delivered in the dryest and most sarcastic tone of voice I've ever heard.

Some bloke in a microlight near Fairford this year also wanted to fly through during the practice displays, briefly argued the toss when told he couldn't too. Beggars belief really.
DamienB is offline  
Old 23rd August 2002 | 00:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Bath
Talk Reaction

Just coincidence. I'd read the thread and was then trying to figure out the new AIS site. I might be many things, but I'm not a NOTAM spotter, or any other kind for that matter :-)

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 23rd August 2002 | 09:10
  #11 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 21
From: Used to be God's own County
Told you that it was a sweeping statement.....in the mil guys defence....there is an ever increasing amount of bumf to read before every sortie, it beggars belief, hardly surprising that some get overlooked in these days of over-stretch. Please don't compare that to some dim-wit getting into the air without a cursory glance over one document.
Anybody care to list the documents that have to be read then perhaps our non-mil guys will get an idea of the workload involved!

Ian, can't believe what NATS have done with the NOTAM system.....please tell me someone will get promoted for this latest crass 'improvement' !!
EESDL is offline  
Old 23rd August 2002 | 09:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: UK
A disused airfield in East Anglia, NOTAMED for weekend parachuting activity, two student canopies in the air, and two C130's come blasting right through the overhead, very scary indeed. Enquiries via CAA revealed RAF 'unaware' of airfield activity, were using as turning point for navigational excercises!

It's not always the weekend warrior in his spamcan that f***s up.

Thank you for your attention.
Surly Bondslipper is offline  
Old 23rd August 2002 | 13:54
  #13 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: UK
There's obviously so much to read that you don't have time to plan a sortie that doesn't take you within a gnats's todger of my ATZ of through the Instrument Approach, which (due to the complete lack of airspace policy in the UK) happens to be in the FIR!!
matspart3 is offline  
Old 23rd August 2002 | 14:36
  #14 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 21
From: Used to be God's own County
Couldn't agree more, let's regulate the whole of our airspace then there would not be any infringements...'cos we'd be already in it!! Works for London.

Seen it myself in Flt Planning......clerk misplots/omits point entirely, captain gets it in the neck!!! RAF still work the policy that everyone apart the captain cannot be held responsible if it all goes pear-shaped.........so, if the capt has to double-check everything anyway, why bother with the clerks?

Certain tasks are delegated but not sufficiently monitored.......point being: The mil pilot has to check countless docs, the civ pilot very few (I know 'cos I am one).

Hells bells, I fly with pilots who don't even know the RF 'phone number!! Scary world out there, so like I said before, let's regulate all of the airspace
EESDL is offline  
Old 23rd August 2002 | 15:09
  #15 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: UK
I accept that a disappointingly large number of PPL's fail to brief themselves adequately. There's no excuse. Being an ATCO at a very busy, predominantley GA airfield, I'm often on the wrong end of converstions with people who shouldn't be let out with a shopping trolley, let alone half a ton of flying metal.
My point, however, is that military sorties are often flown extremely close my ATZ and regularly through the Instrument Approach procedures. IMHO, this is equally silly. The ATZ dimensions offer no effective protection to my traffic. Flying a 3° glidepath on the instrument approach will put you below 1000' over a mile from the ATZ boundary and the circuit often extends beyond 2 miles when we're integrating Learjets with Cessna 150's. Wouldn't it be mutually beneficial if the military gave busy civil fields in the FIR a wider berth? Maybe MATZ dimensions?
matspart3 is offline  
Old 24th August 2002 | 04:37
  #16 (permalink)  
BRL
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: Brighton. UK. (Via Liverpool).
I got this moved from the Mil forum. I think its quite interesting. What do you lot think?
BRL is offline  
Old 24th August 2002 | 06:06
  #17 (permalink)  
Tee
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Got talking to a student PPL recently who was about to depart on his first solo navex and who, by that stage in his training, had never heard of NOTAMs - hadn't a clue what they were.
Tee is offline  
Old 24th August 2002 | 07:07
  #18 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Personal experiences...

(1) I fly regularly from a small (non-radio, non-ATZ) but nonetheless well known and clearly visible site next door to a **** MATZ (Helicopters). We're averaging at-least 3 reportable airproxes IN OUR CIRCUIT per year with mil helos. I suppose 1-2 per year are being filed, yet the (*insert armed service of your choice*) still won't mark it on thier charts as an avoid or brief their crew on our standard circuit, join and departure procedures.

(2) A couple of days ago I was routing down the E coast to Southend in a PA28. I was intending to route nearish to Clacton, so gave them a call about 10 miles out, was told they were having an airshow and wouldn't appreciate my company, so I stayed well clear. Problem solved, wouldn't even have made the call if I'd managed to get NOTAM information out of this blasted AIS website that I still can't work properly.

(3) About this time last year I was having a break at the IRW (International Rocket Weekend, yes - Engineers have strange hobbies) in Largs, which is on the W coast of Scotland just south of Glasgow. The site was notammed all week for rocket launching to FL50. About 3 times per day, throughout, we had to stop launches as aircraft (including an Islander, so not a PPL) flew straight through the NOTAMed launching area.

(4) A few weeks ago I got dragged in to avoid a microlight site getting closed down, which is close to a Nuclear power station. A PPL had flown 300ft above the top of the reactor.

(5) Bumped into a friend (an instructor examiner) at an airfield (neither his home nor mine) where I was doing a days flying. He was revalidating somebody's instructors rating. I'd NB'd on the NOTAMs a rocket launching event going on about 5 miles from the airfield, and flagged it up to them. Both had flown in, neither had noticed it on the NOTAMs.


What this all adds up to, to me at least, is that the system simply doesn't work. So, what do we do about it? Well here's a few suggestions:-

(1) ATIS at major airfields to include NOTAMS within, say, 30nm - or whatever area gives a guaranteed overlap for most of the UK.

(2) A US style 0 - 800 - WX-BRIEF style phone briefing system.

(3) AIS to provide a map of en-route NOTAM affected sites, then we clearly know which to look up without having to either understand their awful website, or work out lats and longs from the old printout system. This surely is no harder than the MET office's charts to produce - 2 pages, a map of the FIR with numbers on, and a numbered list of warnings.

Better still, all of these.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 25th August 2002 | 22:31
  #19 (permalink)  
Player of Games
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Flatland
Returning from Cardiff to Cambridge last week I got the handling
agent to print out the Notam's list so that I could go through
it prior to flight. He stated that I was the first person to do
that with him that year!

There seems to be a lot of the 'damn the torpedoes' attitude
going around nowadays.

-- Andrew
andrewc is offline  
Old 26th August 2002 | 11:55
  #20 (permalink)  

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
I saw the C150 at < 500'...though it was about 1½ hrs after the Harrier had done its display.

Still it did cross my mind that they probably shouldn't have been there, with a spitfire (or whatever), couple of Extra's, Whisky Bravo and the Red Arrows on their way...not to mention the sight seeing helo and the Police helicopter buzzing around and the 500' rule...

Cheers
EA
englishal is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.