Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Twin Hire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Dec 2019, 09:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Twin Hire

Twin HireLooking for a bit of guidance chaps. My brother is looking at doing his twin engine course soon and is looking at viability of hire after. Firstly what’s the cost of twin hire at the moment? Also, he lives and flies out of Compton. Any twins for hire around that area? Finally is there an hours requirement he will need before he can rent?

thanks in advance
mesh is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2019, 12:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Posts: 3,992
Received 34 Likes on 14 Posts
Do people hire twins for fun? Generally they are only used for training, and then it's usually a means to an end - to get an MEIR for an airline job. You might find the insurance requirements make it almost impossible.
rudestuff is online now  
Old 30th Dec 2019, 13:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would of thought some do to go further and quicker. Across water etc....
mesh is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2019, 18:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
No. A single is statistically safer than a twin. A Cirrus is as fast and can go as far with the same payload. BRS if you get into trouble. Fantastic modern avionics and autopilot to relieve the stress of navigation.

As rudestuff says, the only reason for getting a MEP rating is for training for an airline career.

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2019, 22:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst I would concur that most twin flying is for training and not for fun, it depends upon the mission. Longer over water sectors (U.K. - Netherlands/Denmark/Ireland etc) are more appealing in a twin. Remote areas too are better served in a twin, it gives you more options.

Agree that the higher performing singles (SR22/C400 etc) are just as fast and tend to have better avionics / comfort /appeal and have generally lower operating costs which has led to the decline of the light twin.
Duchess_Driver is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 08:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,839
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
You only have to look at the used market to see. Perfectly serviceable old twins like a Seneca can be had for £60k but a 172 or PA28 of the same vintage will cost more.

Once you’ve got some passengers, baggage and fuel in a typical light twin of the above era, there’s only one direction you’re going after an engine failure and it isn’t up...
FullWings is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.