Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Paintwork Coatings - any good?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Paintwork Coatings - any good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Sep 2018, 14:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Age: 64
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paintwork Coatings - any good?

We have been looking at hangering our Arrow over the worst months of the winter. Unfortunately, due to lack of available hangerage at the airfield, we would have to move it quite a bit away, with the obvious problems that causes. However, a bit of clubhouse chat at the weekend led us to thinking of having the aircraft 'tefloned', which, it is claimed, protects well, and is considerably less than hangering fees.

A quick search on St.Google and UKGA brought up a few detailing companies offering 'nano' coatings.

Before I make a prat of myself asking the advertisers silly questions, I thought the collective of Pprune may be able to shed a bit of light on
a. whether nano is the same as teflon
b. is it worth doing
c. what's involved
d. anyone had it done and what did it cost?

Cheers!
jaycee46 is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2018, 15:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I treated my shared Jodel every 2 or 3 years with Autoglym Super Resin polish. It been heavily tested with every paintwork imaginable but if you favour another polish system there is an alternative. The Autoglym pure clear topcoat is incredibly simple to use and gives that long term ice sheet finish and liquid beading. Price is mid range auto polish and not the hype ridden alternatives like those plaguing Facebook at the moment.

Brilliant performance on fabric, composite and metal.

Rob
PPRuNe Towers is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 11:32
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: MAN. UK.
Posts: 2,792
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had my Archer covered in a 'Ceramic coating' by a company in 2016 and again with a 'Nano coating' by another last year. Both were OK but frankly not worth the money, and in the case of the second company I had to ask them to come back as frankly the aircraft looked as shiny as I normally get in two hours with some dry wash/wax bought in Halfords. I didn't really notice any benefit in cleaning and sadly through my own fault entirely I wiped out the Nano coating with a kitchen scourer when removing bugs from the leading edge (Yes, I know that's not a good idea but it's a long story).

Bearing in mind most of these products are being sold for around £600 to £1000 per application you would be as well applying any form of automotive ceramic based gloss yourselves. There are plenty on the market and frankly it will cost you much less. Check YouTube for videos on how to apply them.

Your Arrow will corrode behind the scenes just as fast whether or not you apply any coating. Leaving it outside, especially near any coastline will see you looking at repair bills in a year or two. The benefit you will get is in UV protection from paint fading, but unless you intend to keep the aircraft for many years this won't be your primary concern.

If you can't get hangarage, buy a good aircraft cover, the investment would be more beneficial.
BoeingBoy is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 11:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BoeingBoy

If you can't get hangarage, buy a good aircraft cover, the investment would be more beneficial.
I am not happy about covers, my experience with motorbike covers parked outside is that they can trap moisture and cause corrosion.
There are tent-like portable hangers available, this would be a better idea if your airfield would let you erect one.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 12:19
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: MAN. UK.
Posts: 2,792
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would agree with the above, but given the choice between no cover and exposure to the elements with a paint coating I think the cover would be a better long term investment. Any form of hangarage would give the most benefit.
BoeingBoy is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 21:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I painted an aeroplane for less than I was quoted for a Ceramic coating on a 182. I think it was 2160 gbp.....
irish seaplane is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.