Blackfly by Opener
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: DORSET
Blackfly by Opener
The latest attempt of a flying car, maybe the one to open the market:https://www.geekwire.com/2018/silico...ld-flying-car/
Fleet Manager
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 2,952
From: Ontario, Canada
When I see the innovative ideas for flying cars, and think of the present regulatory standards for certified aircraft, FAR Part 23.143 comes to mind (my bold):
Okay, but if it can't safely glide to a landing, and is too low for a parachute to arrest the descent, it's not as safe as a present day certified aircraft. If society changes their expectations, and removes or alters the requirement that an aircraft be safely landable power off, that's society's choice, but at present, that capability is still a requirement for certification and certification is required for commercial operation of aircraft.
Sec. 23.143
General.
(a) The airplane must be safely controllable and maneuverable during --
(1) Takeoff;
(2) Climb;
(3) Level flight;
(4) Dive; and
(5) Landing (power on and power off).
General.
(a) The airplane must be safely controllable and maneuverable during --
(1) Takeoff;
(2) Climb;
(3) Level flight;
(4) Dive; and
(5) Landing (power on and power off).
“Safety has been our primary driving goal in the development of this new technology,” Opener CEO Marcus Leng said. “Opener will be introducing this innovation in a controlled and responsible manner.
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Joined: Apr 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 57
From: Surrey, UK ;
As the sentence was about the Blackfly, "which will require no formal licensing," I took it to mean there was no need to license the machine. I don't think even the Yanks are daft enough to have uncertified manned flying machines buzzing about, even if they are allowed to be controlled by people without formal training.
However I do appreciate chevvron's explanation, as for years I've wondered what "an unlicensed pilot" meant when seen in the FAA accident reports. I took it to mean some idiot who, had they not been deceased and the reason for the report, would have had the book thrown at them.
Thanks for sticking up for me Jan :-)
However I do appreciate chevvron's explanation, as for years I've wondered what "an unlicensed pilot" meant when seen in the FAA accident reports. I took it to mean some idiot who, had they not been deceased and the reason for the report, would have had the book thrown at them.
Thanks for sticking up for me Jan :-)
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
However, perhaps we should now be starting to take the prospect of flying cars/taxis etc. a bit more seriously.
It's going to make the type of airspace GA normally inhabits a lot more crowded and probably more dangerous.
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 10
From: Ansião (PT)
Why, no, if these thingies ever get certified they should be confined to the same airspace as the parcel delivery drones (which stand a fair chance of being first certificated), say max 500' AGL or so.
