HELP. Previous JAR PPL Training hours for EASA PPL
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Near sheep!
HELP. Previous JAR PPL Training hours for EASA PPL
Hi.
I started my PPL back in 2006, got 24 hours and then bailed due to cost.
I want to start back up. Are any of my hours creditable towards an EASA PPL? I'll be using the same training provider so their records should correspond with mine.
Have tried to find an answer, any help appreciated.
Thanks.
I started my PPL back in 2006, got 24 hours and then bailed due to cost.
I want to start back up. Are any of my hours creditable towards an EASA PPL? I'll be using the same training provider so their records should correspond with mine.
Have tried to find an answer, any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Last edited by WindSheer; 7th February 2018 at 20:34. Reason: Heading typo
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: The World
12 years later, what is your current training status? Is it worth and equal to your training status back in 2006? Given your estimated age it will not matter whether anything is credited. You have to run the syllabus according to FCL and you will end up in the ballpark of at very least the minimum hours.

Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,402
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
WindSheer, unfortunately credit towards the Part-FCL PPL for any previous JAR-FCL training conducted before Sep 2012 ended last year.
However, it is still valid for NPPL(SSEA) training. If you complete an NPPL(SSEA) before 8th April 2018, you can subsequently convert it to a Part-FCL LAPL(A) or PPL(A).
But you must have obtained the NPPL before 8th April 2018!
Many RFs are still too set in their ways to know this, it seems....
However, it is still valid for NPPL(SSEA) training. If you complete an NPPL(SSEA) before 8th April 2018, you can subsequently convert it to a Part-FCL LAPL(A) or PPL(A).
But you must have obtained the NPPL before 8th April 2018!
Many RFs are still too set in their ways to know this, it seems....





