Broadcasting ATC during flying events
Broadcasting ATC during flying events
My understanding is that listening to ATC in many countries is illegal. Whether that makes sense or not is for another thread but my question for now is whether this is ever done?
We have some events coming up next year, in a number of countries, and I was thinking it would really add to the audience experience if they could hear the interaction between the controller and the pilots. From PA speakers, or via an APP on a phone etc.
Anyone done this, or seen (heard!) it done?
Or got reasons why it's a really bad idea?
Thanks, Sam.
PS just seen it's done for Oshkosh - so, more specific, whether this is ever done in Europe?
We have some events coming up next year, in a number of countries, and I was thinking it would really add to the audience experience if they could hear the interaction between the controller and the pilots. From PA speakers, or via an APP on a phone etc.
Anyone done this, or seen (heard!) it done?
Or got reasons why it's a really bad idea?
Thanks, Sam.
PS just seen it's done for Oshkosh - so, more specific, whether this is ever done in Europe?
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you need to do it to read the appropriate legislation for the countries involved. Certainly, what you are proposing is illegal in the UK. My experience of air shows is that the PA systems are so awful that Joe Public probably wouldn't understand the R/T.
Yes, I've understood that it's illegal in the UK - but has anyone every applied for an exemption. Perhaps at the same time as requesting an event-specific frequency?
For the technical aspects, I think that at source rebroadcast via wifi etc. to smartphones would work well and be perfectly understandable.
For the technical aspects, I think that at source rebroadcast via wifi etc. to smartphones would work well and be perfectly understandable.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We had this discussion on our flying group quite often and we always ended in "forget it". The legal issue with official ATC being broadcasted is so complicated that you as a private have no chance to fetch the legal implications (Btw pointing to liveatc does not help as this broadcast is not to be compared with a broadcast at a private event).
But why transmit the ATC frequency with all its legal implications? We usually ended in getting an exempt together with a temporary issued frequency special for the event. In the papers to file for the temporary frequency there usually is a paragraph addressing the issue. The "smoke on" stories from speakers are typically special event frequencies.
But why transmit the ATC frequency with all its legal implications? We usually ended in getting an exempt together with a temporary issued frequency special for the event. In the papers to file for the temporary frequency there usually is a paragraph addressing the issue. The "smoke on" stories from speakers are typically special event frequencies.
Hi CH,
So you easily get an exemption with your temporary frequency?
That's all we want to do, broadcast our own 'chat' - we're not looking to stream LHR TWR...
Thanks, Sam.
So you easily get an exemption with your temporary frequency?
That's all we want to do, broadcast our own 'chat' - we're not looking to stream LHR TWR...
Thanks, Sam.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
You may wish to have someone with their hand on the switch throughout, rather than just turn it on and leave it, so that you can cut it immediately if something starts going wrong. Nobody would want their husband's (or whoever's) last scream broadcast to a field full of punters. Not saying this is necessarily a showstopper, but is something you should consider.
We'd already considered that, including the 'standard' 7 second delay between reality and broadcast (not likely to be noticed by Joe Public).
Technically etc. it's all manageable/easy - I'm more interested in the legality of doing it. If the event-specific frequency can include permission then (in the UK at least) we're golden!
Technically etc. it's all manageable/easy - I'm more interested in the legality of doing it. If the event-specific frequency can include permission then (in the UK at least) we're golden!
NO that's only their own discrete UHF air to air comms frequency; only one of them ever talks to ATC on a different frequency which can be VHF or UHF then relays any message to the rest on the air to air frequency eg at 2 minutes to end of display, the communicator (one of the singletons usually) will call ATC on the display frequency to request wind and formation landing clearance then he returns to the air to air frequency until he lands when he will request taxy instructions.
Last edited by chevvron; 24th Dec 2017 at 18:49.
Yes, I've understood that it's illegal in the UK - but has anyone every applied for an exemption. Perhaps at the same time as requesting an event-specific frequency?
For the technical aspects, I think that at source rebroadcast via wifi etc. to smartphones would work well and be perfectly understandable.
For the technical aspects, I think that at source rebroadcast via wifi etc. to smartphones would work well and be perfectly understandable.
Having done 17 Farnborough Airshows plus a few other displays, I can assure you this is correct.
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,502
Received 212 Likes
on
129 Posts
I recall Will Curtis commentating from his Su26 while performing at Biggin Hill, presumably on a temporary discreet frequency. I was quite impressed that he could talk fairly normally through lomcevaks and the like.
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Warwick
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for ground PA the Reds broadcast their display commands in real time, but they are just clipped instructions rather than a commentary.
Just don't put the RAFAT R/T over the PA whilst they're landing - their puerile shouting and yelling is a total embarrassment....
I wasn't aware that A/A VHF 'chat' frequencies are available to civilian formation pilots. Is that something the CAA allocates?
I wasn't aware that A/A VHF 'chat' frequencies are available to civilian formation pilots. Is that something the CAA allocates?
NO that's only their own discrete UHF air to air comms frequency; only one of them ever talks to ATC on a different frequency which can be VHF or UHF then relays any message to the rest on the air to air frequency eg at 2 minutes to end of display, the communicator (one of the singletons usually) will call ATC on the display frequency to request wind and formation landing clearance then he returns to the air to air frequency until he lands when he will request taxy instructions.
I did seen an interesting argument that the organisers could 'authorise' spectators to listen, or are actually doing so if they publicise the relevant frequencies. Seems doubtful to me though.
Last edited by Dr Jekyll; 26th Dec 2017 at 07:56. Reason: Add 'in the UK'
This is what Chevvron seems to be saying - that on the paperwork needed to request an 'event frequency' there's a part where you can simultaneously request permission to have the public listen to it?
I have no knowledge of the paperwork involved as all my requests for extra frequencies for Farnborough were done by e-mail in the days before the application foms were introduced.
What I was trying to say was that the 'display' frequency should be so quiet it would be of no interest to any listeners other than those with a 'need' to listen ie Display director and controller.
Last edited by chevvron; 26th Dec 2017 at 19:57.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
that on the paperwork needed to request an 'event frequency' there's a part where you can simultaneously request permission to have the public listen to it?
I've heard regular ATC re-broadcast over P.A. at a few events and I don't think it adds anything to the occasion. Enthusiasts will have scanners to enhance their particular interests. As with new flying students, more casual airshow attendees won't be able to make out what's going on. Better to employ an informed commentator (into wistful nostalgia mode with memories of John Blake, the very best of the best, with Raymond Baxter a close second).
TOO
Not on SRG 1417 that I've been using for the past few years, there isn't. The 17-odd requests I make every year are for 'silent' frequencies, to be used only for essential safety comms. You have to prove a need for the frequency, so make out a safety case with your submission.
I've heard regular ATC re-broadcast over P.A. at a few events and I don't think it adds anything to the occasion. Enthusiasts will have scanners to enhance their particular interests. As with new flying students, more casual airshow attendees won't be able to make out what's going on. Better to employ an informed commentator (into wistful nostalgia mode with memories of John Blake, the very best of the best, with Raymond Baxter a close second).
TOO
I've heard regular ATC re-broadcast over P.A. at a few events and I don't think it adds anything to the occasion. Enthusiasts will have scanners to enhance their particular interests. As with new flying students, more casual airshow attendees won't be able to make out what's going on. Better to employ an informed commentator (into wistful nostalgia mode with memories of John Blake, the very best of the best, with Raymond Baxter a close second).
TOO