Transitioning from Cessna 150 to 172S
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Seoul,Korea
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Transitioning from Cessna 150 to 172S
Hi. I'm a low time (54hrs) private pilot who got the license from the FAA.
I've done all my training in a little cessna 150. But in order to get a license transition to my country's license, i have to do a simplified checkride again.
The problem is that there is no Cessna 150 available in my country. All the trainings here are conducted with Cessna 172s and Diamonds.
I choose 172S for the license transition and the course starts 2months later.
I'm really worried about transitioning to an unfamiliar aircraft. What can i do to prepare for that before the course starts? Are there a lot of differences between those two aircrafts?
Thank you and happy landings in advance to everyone
I've done all my training in a little cessna 150. But in order to get a license transition to my country's license, i have to do a simplified checkride again.
The problem is that there is no Cessna 150 available in my country. All the trainings here are conducted with Cessna 172s and Diamonds.
I choose 172S for the license transition and the course starts 2months later.
I'm really worried about transitioning to an unfamiliar aircraft. What can i do to prepare for that before the course starts? Are there a lot of differences between those two aircrafts?
Thank you and happy landings in advance to everyone
Moderator
Welcome 79S,
You'll have no problem transitioning from the 150 to the 172. Avoid carrying back seat occupants, or aft C of G's for your first flying, and you'll be fine. The 172 is a little heavier, which will mean to have to allow for a very slight delay in the affect of control inputs compared to the 150, but also, it's not upset by a gust as easily. Pay more attention to your fuel selector.
Worry not, after an hour's flying, it'll fit like a Cessna glove...
You'll have no problem transitioning from the 150 to the 172. Avoid carrying back seat occupants, or aft C of G's for your first flying, and you'll be fine. The 172 is a little heavier, which will mean to have to allow for a very slight delay in the affect of control inputs compared to the 150, but also, it's not upset by a gust as easily. Pay more attention to your fuel selector.
Worry not, after an hour's flying, it'll fit like a Cessna glove...
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Step 1 : Take a deep breath in, hold it in for 10 seconds, and slowly breathe out...
Step 2 : Sit down and close your eyes
Step 3 : Repeat step 1 two or three times, then open your eyes (if you're still awake)
Now you're ready, to take your next steps.
Your PPL training will have encompassed all the things that apply to most SEP (single engine piston) non-complex aeroplanes. All planes are ever so slightly different, speeds vary slightly, the view from outside the plane is ever so slightly different too - even in the same type of plane, two C150 may feel completely different to one another!
Biggest differences between the C150 and C172 is that the the C172 is much bigger, has 4 seats, more fuel, and generally a bigger engine which consumes more fuel per hour. The biggest difference to me was the weight of the plane, was that the 150 really gets bumped around in every thermal / gust, whilst the 172 is a little more stable. Depending on what year / type / upgrade has been done on the 172, you may have a fuel injected engine which although runs the same, has a different start procedure and no carburettor heat which you'll need to get used to. But all the main buttons and knobs are all in the same place.
What I would do, is ask the school where you are going's POH for the C172, and skim read it paying attention to the weight and balance, various speeds (landing / takeoff / stall / vfe....), any limiting factors (such as VFE), takeoff and landing distances, and fuel contents. The school may also have handling notes, that may be of use to you. Also ask if they have a checklist that you can buy / have - that will get you used to the checks required (its all generally the same between the two, but familiarity will help!)
On the whole, it isn't THAT different - and you'll be just fine! Don't expect to be a perfect pilot within a 30 minute check flight - but after a few hours, you'll realise that its all the same!
Hope this helps!
Step 2 : Sit down and close your eyes
Step 3 : Repeat step 1 two or three times, then open your eyes (if you're still awake)
Now you're ready, to take your next steps.
Your PPL training will have encompassed all the things that apply to most SEP (single engine piston) non-complex aeroplanes. All planes are ever so slightly different, speeds vary slightly, the view from outside the plane is ever so slightly different too - even in the same type of plane, two C150 may feel completely different to one another!
Biggest differences between the C150 and C172 is that the the C172 is much bigger, has 4 seats, more fuel, and generally a bigger engine which consumes more fuel per hour. The biggest difference to me was the weight of the plane, was that the 150 really gets bumped around in every thermal / gust, whilst the 172 is a little more stable. Depending on what year / type / upgrade has been done on the 172, you may have a fuel injected engine which although runs the same, has a different start procedure and no carburettor heat which you'll need to get used to. But all the main buttons and knobs are all in the same place.
What I would do, is ask the school where you are going's POH for the C172, and skim read it paying attention to the weight and balance, various speeds (landing / takeoff / stall / vfe....), any limiting factors (such as VFE), takeoff and landing distances, and fuel contents. The school may also have handling notes, that may be of use to you. Also ask if they have a checklist that you can buy / have - that will get you used to the checks required (its all generally the same between the two, but familiarity will help!)
On the whole, it isn't THAT different - and you'll be just fine! Don't expect to be a perfect pilot within a 30 minute check flight - but after a few hours, you'll realise that its all the same!
Hope this helps!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The school may also have handling notes, that may be of use to you. Also ask if they have a checklist that you can buy / have - that will get you used to the checks required
The 172 is about the most common aircraft in use in the world. There's really nothing new to say about it, which had not been well documented during the last 60 years. Therefore things like handling notes, which are pretty important for other much less well known types, are not needed for the 172. Fly it within the placarded limitations, and it's hard to go wrong.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I used to love about the 172 when I spent a season pleasure flying in one was that you could sit at the end of the runway, set 10 degrees flap and start the takeoff roll. Without any obvious change in attitude the aeroplane would politely lift off at the correct speed which my pax, many of whom had never flown before, very much appreciated.
P.P.
P.P.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 172 is an absolute pussy, the definition of a 'car with wings.' You will have no problem whatsoever moving over, don't even give it a moment's worry.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Seoul,Korea
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you all for the kind answers. To sum up your answers, i don't have to be nervous about getting familiar with it and study the airplane properly with AFM,POH and checklists because there are some differences about the systems. Right?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
79S, Bear in mind that all certified airplanes are certified to a standard of "must not require unusual pilot skill and attention" [to fly]. Yes, different types, obviously have differences - that is the point. But, within a class, those differences generally won't be so great that a reasonably practiced pilot can't manage okay. Certainly a Cessna 150 to a 172S is completely within the realm of "you can manage". I extend this statement to transition between C172/PA-28 fixed gear series.
That should not be taken to mean that you don't bother to understand the aircraft, nor seek some training. But, you should feel confident in going ahead with the flying. The fuel injection requires a little more awareness, and slightly different technique - so read the flight manual.
Where you should be much more cautious, are future class changes. Transitioning from C 150/152/172 to a C 177 or 210, for example requires some training, and mentored practice. A part of this is of course retractable gear, which should be trained to you. Flying the T tailed PA-28's requires type specific mentoring. And, of course, tailwheel and float flying require specific additional training.
One of the skills you want to build in piloting is to be confident in learning a new type. Certainly, ask type specific questions here, but read and understand the flight manual for the aircraft you propose to fly. Don't fixate on memorizing speeds to the knot, the ones you must know are marked on the airspeed indicator - by regulation. Rather focus on understanding the systems and differences of the aircraft, and how you will handle an unusual event without fumbling for checklists. Use the checklist to check that you're already doing what you should do, rather than as a recipe for flying the aircraft.
That should not be taken to mean that you don't bother to understand the aircraft, nor seek some training. But, you should feel confident in going ahead with the flying. The fuel injection requires a little more awareness, and slightly different technique - so read the flight manual.
Where you should be much more cautious, are future class changes. Transitioning from C 150/152/172 to a C 177 or 210, for example requires some training, and mentored practice. A part of this is of course retractable gear, which should be trained to you. Flying the T tailed PA-28's requires type specific mentoring. And, of course, tailwheel and float flying require specific additional training.
One of the skills you want to build in piloting is to be confident in learning a new type. Certainly, ask type specific questions here, but read and understand the flight manual for the aircraft you propose to fly. Don't fixate on memorizing speeds to the knot, the ones you must know are marked on the airspeed indicator - by regulation. Rather focus on understanding the systems and differences of the aircraft, and how you will handle an unusual event without fumbling for checklists. Use the checklist to check that you're already doing what you should do, rather than as a recipe for flying the aircraft.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rather focus on understanding the systems and differences of the aircraft, and how you will handle an unusual event without fumbling for checklists.
said 'No, no, no, get the checklist out and use it, that's what it's there for.'
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, can't say I disagree with either of you but it does show there are different opinions out there amongst people who know far better than me.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't argue against the use of checklists, however there are flaws in the concept, in a single pilot situation. If the checklist is being used by a second crew member, as a challenge and response, when that second crew member is not task saturated, excellent. However, when a pilot is trying to fly, manage an abnormal situation, the attempt to use a checklist as "instructions", could itself become task saturation for the pilot. And, if a checklist is being used, and that use is interrupted, really the checklist should be begun again from the top. More task saturation, with the possibility that the checklist must be restarted several times to get to the end.
The use of a checklist during normal operations, when the pilot is able to allocate time for its use is fine. But, abnormal events of an urgent nature may not be the right time to refer to a checklist - those should be memory items, based upon understanding the aircraft. Get it settled, then when all is calm, and the aircraft secure, and under control, refer to the checklist to assure that the steps you have taken were correct and complete.
In the context of 150 to 172, this is low seriousness stuff. Aside possibly from fuel mismanaged caused engine failures, there really aren't any abnormal events in a 150 or 172 for which a checklist needs to be used in real time. Yes, during normal operations, of after the event, refer to the checklist.
The only thing worse than not referring to the checklist, when you really needed to, is referring to it, and missing some steps, 'cause you rushed, and not knowing that you missed those steps!
For certain complex aircraft I fly, I do use a checklist, as I recognize, that although I know how to fly it, missing a step, particularly during a turbine engine start, can cause an expensive mistake. For the 150 - 172... if you miss a start step, it probably just won't start!
The use of a checklist during normal operations, when the pilot is able to allocate time for its use is fine. But, abnormal events of an urgent nature may not be the right time to refer to a checklist - those should be memory items, based upon understanding the aircraft. Get it settled, then when all is calm, and the aircraft secure, and under control, refer to the checklist to assure that the steps you have taken were correct and complete.
In the context of 150 to 172, this is low seriousness stuff. Aside possibly from fuel mismanaged caused engine failures, there really aren't any abnormal events in a 150 or 172 for which a checklist needs to be used in real time. Yes, during normal operations, of after the event, refer to the checklist.
The only thing worse than not referring to the checklist, when you really needed to, is referring to it, and missing some steps, 'cause you rushed, and not knowing that you missed those steps!
For certain complex aircraft I fly, I do use a checklist, as I recognize, that although I know how to fly it, missing a step, particularly during a turbine engine start, can cause an expensive mistake. For the 150 - 172... if you miss a start step, it probably just won't start!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How did people manage before the internet. I flew a C172 when I learning to fly in 1969 and the C150 wasn't available one day. The instructor said something like its a bit bigger. That was it, take away the mystery and fly the aircraft. If you approach any new aircraft looking for commonalities it's much easier.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Likewise people who are told they will need a couple of hours 'conversion' training from something like a 172 to a 28. Am I wrong to think that some ATOs milk it a little? I can go from a Ford to a Honda without a driving instructor sitting with me for an hour. Ok that might be an over simplification but you get my drift.
I learned to fly mostly in a 172. The first time I flew a 28 I asked my instructor what the difference was, he said 'The main difference is you have to bend down to take a fuel sample'. One circuit later I was away on my own in it.
I learned to fly mostly in a 172. The first time I flew a 28 I asked my instructor what the difference was, he said 'The main difference is you have to bend down to take a fuel sample'. One circuit later I was away on my own in it.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I learned to fly mostly in a 172. The first time I flew a 28 I asked my instructor what the difference was, he said 'The main difference is you have to bend down to take a fuel sample'. One circuit later I was away on my own in it.
I found the upper air work really helpful, not really for the actual flying/stalling etc, but more for just being taught about the fan controls and cabin heating etc (the little luxuries).
I'm now wanting to convert properly onto the C172, but don't want to pay £360 for two hours that I probably won't really need as I did my first circuits in a 172...
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thing - haha! For me the biggest difference was reaching for the trim wheel without looking and not finding it... (old habbits eh?) It was even more confusing where to find the trim when I flew an older PA28 with the trim overhead!!
The only reason I mentioned checklist - and this specifically relates to the fact that he/she is changing school, and the school's checklist may be slightly different. Same applies re: handling notes, this is again only to minimise the potential for the school to milk it a little more... This is only for familiarity. If you've read it a few times, in the order and style that the particular checklist they use has, it makes it a little easier once you're in the plane.
Generally speaking, all SEP planes can be flown with the same "patter", (ie: downwind checks that I was taught included "gear - fixed, propeller pitch fixed... etc... which I have used in all SEPs I have flown without alteration other than the particular answer to each, for instance "gear down and locked, three greens" or "carb-heat - not applicable" or "alternator not present") aside from the slightly different engine start procedures - its all the same titles.
Re: gear issue, I think it would be wise, to know your systems. I have always gone through the first "sanity" check before reaching for the checklist (ie: in the PA28 - are my instrument lights on in daylight? Have I selected gear down? Is the knob really in the down position? Are the light bulbs working? Is the emergency gear lever in the correct position? Is the override on? - then when all those failed, I placed myself in a known position, away from the circuit and planned a loose holding pattern to work out my issues, and then and only then reached for the checklist to work through it methodically to ensure all possibilities are covered, before making the decision where I would rather land her on the belly, ie: which aerodromes nearby with emergency facilities open? tarmac? grass? etc...
Generally - something in the sanity check will remind you that you've been an idiot, and you can rectify this without having to leave the circuit to work out the problem by following a checklist properly.
Yes, Cessna_79S - I think the move between C150 and C172 will be similar to moving from say... a Nissan Micra to a Ford Focus - the controls are the same, the same principles apply when you're driving, its a bit bigger, have a bigger engine, the speeds between the gears is a little different, as is where all the buttons are. But really... Its pretty much the same - you should get it pretty instantly. The reason I mention a few hours, is that generally schools will milk it if they can, and a low hour PPL they'll find something that they believe you weren't taught in the same way and try to persuade you their technique is better.... (been there many times). Clubs are a much better option in my mind!
The only reason I mentioned checklist - and this specifically relates to the fact that he/she is changing school, and the school's checklist may be slightly different. Same applies re: handling notes, this is again only to minimise the potential for the school to milk it a little more... This is only for familiarity. If you've read it a few times, in the order and style that the particular checklist they use has, it makes it a little easier once you're in the plane.
Generally speaking, all SEP planes can be flown with the same "patter", (ie: downwind checks that I was taught included "gear - fixed, propeller pitch fixed... etc... which I have used in all SEPs I have flown without alteration other than the particular answer to each, for instance "gear down and locked, three greens" or "carb-heat - not applicable" or "alternator not present") aside from the slightly different engine start procedures - its all the same titles.
Re: gear issue, I think it would be wise, to know your systems. I have always gone through the first "sanity" check before reaching for the checklist (ie: in the PA28 - are my instrument lights on in daylight? Have I selected gear down? Is the knob really in the down position? Are the light bulbs working? Is the emergency gear lever in the correct position? Is the override on? - then when all those failed, I placed myself in a known position, away from the circuit and planned a loose holding pattern to work out my issues, and then and only then reached for the checklist to work through it methodically to ensure all possibilities are covered, before making the decision where I would rather land her on the belly, ie: which aerodromes nearby with emergency facilities open? tarmac? grass? etc...
Generally - something in the sanity check will remind you that you've been an idiot, and you can rectify this without having to leave the circuit to work out the problem by following a checklist properly.
Yes, Cessna_79S - I think the move between C150 and C172 will be similar to moving from say... a Nissan Micra to a Ford Focus - the controls are the same, the same principles apply when you're driving, its a bit bigger, have a bigger engine, the speeds between the gears is a little different, as is where all the buttons are. But really... Its pretty much the same - you should get it pretty instantly. The reason I mention a few hours, is that generally schools will milk it if they can, and a low hour PPL they'll find something that they believe you weren't taught in the same way and try to persuade you their technique is better.... (been there many times). Clubs are a much better option in my mind!
Like you I learned in 172s and although the actual flying skills transferred seamlessly to the Pa28 learning the different systems wasn't as straight forward. Fuel pump, tank switching (no both setting?!?) electric trim, manual flaps - they all took some time to get used to. Did you fly a slab or tapered wing Pa28? They fly quite differently to each other, let alone a 172.