Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Airframe dataplate change in the UK?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Airframe dataplate change in the UK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Dec 2016, 14:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airframe dataplate change in the UK?

The airplane I purchased in the UK, and exported to Canada has an airframe dataplate which is a replacement of the original, and not the same. In addition to the manufacturer's data for the 'plane, the UK registration has been added. The replacement dataplate is very well made, a bit too well... It has attracted attention during the import process, as it is neither original, correct (now wrong registration), nor was there any maintenance reference to it having been changed.

There was never damage to that area of the fuselage, so it would not have been replaced during a repair, and it is much larger than the dataplate it replaced (I have the sister 'plane, so I know what it should look like).

Is anyone aware of any reason that a UK registered 'plane might require a changed dataplate, and/or the addition of the aircraft registration on the dataplate? In Canada, we are required to have a fireproof registration plate, but it is a different plate to the manufacturer's dataplate - which is not supposed to be altered.

Any thoughts?
9 lives is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2016, 21:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
UK is just the same, normally the makers plate is never touched. However I have seen one type (BO 105) where there was a box for the registration on the makers plate. I never saw one that had this information added.

The requirement for a registration plate was part of the Air Navigation Order however this seems to have disappeared with the 2016 revision. Could be this is now an EASA requirement.
Correction it is still in the ANO Schedule 4

Loss of the plate can be serious as manufacturers are reluctant to replace them. How did it get an export Cof A without a plate?

Last edited by ericferret; 23rd Dec 2016 at 13:01.
ericferret is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2016, 02:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who says a manufacturers plate is not supposed to be altered?

As the plates do have an entry field for the registration it is to be changed upon change of registration. They are no VIN plates. Usually this is a 5£ spare part you get from the manufacturer and get it engraved yourself. For some airframes the plate is even drawn in measure in the maintenance manual to let you go to a local shop and get it done there.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2016, 12:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
You can indeed get a makers plate as a spare, what the blank one I have lacks is the manufacturers inspection stamp. The question becomes how do I know this aircraft is the one that the log books refer to? Without an original data plate there is know way of knowing. Aircraft "ringers" are not unknown, at one time Bell stated that after subtracting known write offs there were more Bell 47 flying than Bell built. Buyer beware as always.

https://blog.globalair.com/post/Can-...-Internet.aspx

If a replacement plate is installed then there should be a log book entry to reflect the change.
Technically this would be a repair or modification.

Last edited by ericferret; 23rd Dec 2016 at 13:35.
ericferret is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2016, 13:12
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've reviewed the Canadian regulations, and permission is required from "The Minister" (meaning Transport Canada) to replace or change a data plate. Though it does not state, I would presume that the process of obtaining this permission, and accomplishing the work should result in a tech log entry. In the case of my 'plane, this change was obviously made in the UK, and there is no log entry for this work, nor evidence of permission. The new data plate is beautifully made, so it was not a casual effort, it's just not original.

If someone can point me toward a similar UK CAA regulation, I would be appreciative...
9 lives is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2016, 15:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Depending on the type you may need an EASA regulation..................
MrAverage is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2016, 09:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depending on the type you may need an EASA regulation..................
I somehow doubt there is one.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2016, 10:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: South East England
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the "creativity" that has been allowed to go on in the warbird community in the UK I think it would prove very difficult for the UK CAA to take a hard line stance on this subject.
Stampe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.