Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

CTSW classification and SEP revalidation

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

CTSW classification and SEP revalidation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th September 2016 | 15:14
  #21 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
I think that those changes may only apply to UK / NPPL licences, not to EASA licences, where this isn't in the CAA's gift - but I've certainly heard similar suggestions.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2016 | 08:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Plumpton Green
When I applied for a stand alone FAA licence and asked if the hours in my microlight CH601UL counted, the response was "It's an airplane, isn't it?". I was left in no doubt that it was a stupid question.
patowalker is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2016 | 10:00
  #23 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 5
From: The Wild West (UK)
I think that those changes may only apply to UK / NPPL licences, not to EASA licences, where this isn't in the CAA's gift - but I've certainly heard similar suggestions.
I suppose that would perhaps open up a route where you could keep current on an SSDR then painlessly go back to flying a group A permit aircraft?
abgd is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2016 | 10:23
  #24 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,394
Likes: 856
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
When we heard that EASA hadn't changed its views concerning microlight / ultralight aeroplanes in its NPA 2014/29 proposals, IAOPA (Europe) proposed an amendment to FCL.010, introducing a formal definition of a '3-axis' control system as well as associated amendments to FCL.035 and FCL.740.A.

Our proposal is that flight time in certain microlight / ultralight aeroplanes should be allowable towards revalidation of SEP Class Ratings, provided that the aircraft is fitted with a three-axis control system, a non-flexible wing and is not foot-launched, also that at least 1 hour of PIC time and 6 take-offs and landings are completed in the validity period in aircraft of the same class which are not microlight / ultralight.

I just hope that the CAA won't blunder ahead with another poorly thought out 'national' proposal before the Comment Response Document for NPA 2014/29 is published - otherwise they'll simply cause even more confusion than they already have with their medical declaration system....
BEagle is online now  
Reply
Old 25th September 2016 | 18:26
  #25 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Originally Posted by patowalker
When I applied for a stand alone FAA licence and asked if the hours in my microlight CH601UL counted, the response was "It's an airplane, isn't it?". I was left in no doubt that it was a stupid question.
Well yes - I have two different totals in my logbook - the EASA total and FAA total. It keeps the world happy.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.