Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Small wheel controversy!

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Small wheel controversy!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Aug 2016, 03:56
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taildraggers offer operational advantages in certain very specific environments (undeveloped runways, ski flying and flying boats) , and are great for improving one's piloting skills. However, the majority of aircraft operations do not benefit from these characteristics, and are sensitive to the reduced directional stability during certain phases of ground operations. Its great that pilots might become proficient in taildraggers, they will be better pilots for it. Similarly, they will be better pilots for receiving aerobatic/instrument/multi engine/night/rotorcraft training too! Learn and practice every type of flying you can!
Yeah but don't taildraggers just look a whole lot better?

P-51 with a nosewheel? Nah.
Small Rodent Driver is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2016, 09:57
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jan Olieslagers
Tailwheels are very good indeed - for those skygods that can master them. Which was all the purpose for creating this thread, I reckon.
I'm still trying to come to terms with being a God.
Should I expect mere mortals to prostrate themselves before me?
Crash one is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2016, 12:37
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,785
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts


It takes more to be divine than to master one particular technique. I think it must be a kind of a mindset thing.

That said, if you can stand disappointment it never hurts to expect
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2016, 07:51
  #64 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Tailwheels are very good indeed - for those skygods that can master them. Which was all the purpose for creating this thread, I reckon.
The purpose of creating the thread was to generate discussion - which it has done. I was interested to find out why, when a club has such an experience available, why so few pilots want to try it. There is an aircraft available, for the same cost as the PA28 which requires a slightly different set of skills, can fly aerobatics and spin. Yet, only a few people feel the need to try it. I can appreciate that some pilots just don't want to fly aerobatics, but just to experience a different form of aviation will probably make you a better pilot, even if flown for only a few hours.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2016, 09:31
  #65 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes on 224 Posts
I was interested to find out why, when a club has such an experience available, why so few pilots want to try it.
Probably because they are frightened of it. Due to the "aura" put in place around these so-called terribly difficult to fly aircraft.

About twenty five years ago I was offered a ride in a tail dragger, a Beagle Husky, by a private pilot with his own aircraft. He took off, then handed control to me. We flew around for a while (he wanted to take some photos) then he said it was time to go back and land. He told me I could land it, which I did. Due to a non-working intercom, I just got on with it. I three pointed it on the 400m grass runway.

He complimented me on the landing and asked me when I'd last landed a tail dragger. I told him the flight we'd just done was the first one I'd done. But I'm certainly no sky-god; I was instructing on military, nose wheel equipped SEPs at the time. Perhaps I just knew no better but I had been taught from a very early age that main wheels are for landing on and nose wheels are only for steering with after the landing is finished
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2016, 10:05
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was taught the same way. Also taught that landing in a crosswind with a steerable nosewheel and putting the nosewheel down with a boot full of rudder was a bad idea!
Crash one is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2016, 18:06
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vienna
Age: 50
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was interested to find out why, when a club has such an experience available, why so few pilots want to try it. There is an aircraft available, for the same cost as the PA28 which requires a slightly different set of skills, can fly aerobatics and spin. Yet, only a few people feel the need to try it.
Be careful what you wish for, it may be more than your favorite aircraft can handle:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23NE8mushvc
Also, a PPL friend was/is in a similar situation: badly bitten by the tailwheel bug and delighted to have the opportunity to be one of very few to regularly fly a Cub. Then another not-so-regular user recently had a groundloop and scraped a wingtip (no real harm done though, apparently).
Armchairflyer is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2016, 16:25
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the risk of sticking my head into the hornets nest I must agree with the original poster, as a relatively new pilot about (1 year/100hrs) I am already thoroughly bored of the standard club aircraft, they are simply dull to fly, to slow to take much further than a few hundred miles, a tail wheel at least takes work to fly.

(obviously before someone suggests it i'm most certainly not claiming to be anything above a distinctly average pilot)
Mav5r1k is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 15:43
  #69 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,618
Received 63 Likes on 44 Posts
Welcome Mav,

Generally, tailwheel aircraft offer a type of flying not so common for tricycle types. Sometimes it's speed, sometimes it's actually superior slow speed capability, or off airport, or alternate landing gear. But rarely is it more than one or two of these characteristics!

But, happily, every tailwheel aircraft will demand more of you as a pilot, and reward skillful flying with a greater sense of achievement, and simply fun!
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 23:51
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 1,094
Received 77 Likes on 55 Posts
I'm a big fan of tailwheel airplanes. My son's second lesson this AM:


As I have matured I don't count myself as superior to nosedragger pilots. All flying is good.
IFMU is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 01:44
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a generational thing.

When I learned to fly there were only tail wheel airplanes to learn on so we had no idea they were so difficult to fly and thus they were not difficult.

By the way the PPL was a thirty hour minimum flying course then ...1953....a lot of us finished in the minimum thirty hours and went on to fly for decades with no problem.

However today's generation of flight instructors look on tail wheel airplanes as some kind of black magic machine and are afraid to fly them.

It is called " Ignorance "
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 07:26
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: N.YORKSHIRE
Posts: 889
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
A quick squint at what I've flown over the last ten days.
PA28
PA32 260
PA32 300
Cessna 172
Cessna 182
Jodel
Eurostar
Super Cub
R44


Love 'em all.
Flyingmac is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 13:34
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I learned to fly there were only tail wheel airplanes to learn on
C'mon Chuck, the planes didn't have tailwheels back then, they had wooden skids!
9 lives is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 16:17
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 1,094
Received 77 Likes on 55 Posts
Things have really gone downhill since they ditched the skids and put a wheel on the back. Pilot skill has generally degraded with the addition of the training wheel. We still have a few skid equipped aircraft here at C77- the way it should be.
IFMU is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.