Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Business Plane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd March 2016 | 08:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Ho Chi Minh
Business Plane

Im interested in purchasing a small business plane for my company, and basing it in Vietnam. The goal is to make short trips within Vietnam, also to Thailand, Singapore, Philippines, Hong Kong, China ect, with limited amount of passengers.

The plane that I've somewhat zeroed in on is a used Piper Seneca V.

Can anyone give me more of an expert opinion if this plane would work? Alternatively if anyone has a different plane they think would work better I would be grateful to hear.

My experience with planes is solely as a passenger in private travel, more so with light jets.
BFGH is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 10:27
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
Up to 5 pax (plus pilot) with limited baggage it could be OK, you need to consider the weather in this region though as to how practical it would be.
foxmoth is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 10:57
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Around the world.
Fit a Honeywell RDR 2000 weather radar if you go down this path (I think this would fit although would need some other avionics to interface?). I wouldn't want to fly around this area without a radar IFR/IMC. I would probably want oxygen also to get above the weather a bit.

Make sure the pilot is experienced and competent, don't just go for the cheapest. It isn't the kind of flying suited for an enthusiastic amateur.

With regards to range etc I am sure you can work that out.
tom775257 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 12:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 1
From: In the boot of my car!
I have around 3000 hours in Seneca Fives all over Europe, over the Alps and over Scotland and Ireland and viewed them as a mini Kingair90B

lIke any aircraft there are plus and minus points. They are excellent at dealing with weather and you have an efficient built in oxygen system where you can quickly climb to the high teens or low 20s and get a TAS of over 200 KTS
Engine out over high terrain they are one of the very few that will maintain 16500 feet on one engine and are great short field aircraft with low fuel consumption
They have safe pedestrian handling qualities and the aircraft is a tried and tested design still built with quick availability of parts cheap compared to Barons
Down side is limited range and LEGAL carrying capacity

I love them as a trusted friend but I know many will disagree
Like with any aircraft choice you need to work out a mission profile! How many people will you carry on a typical mission not once a year? What are your normal mission lengths again not once a year. If one leg is more than the range can you fit in a quick refuel stop? and go from there. consider fuel availability and cost too as you may also consider a cheap turbine like one of the piper Cheyenne family which are cheap and cheerful but getting long in the tooth or even an older KingAir 90 if you want pressurised comfort and carrying capacity with good parts availability

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 23rd March 2016 at 12:47.
Pace is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 13:34
  #5 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 323
From: east ESSEX
Might have to consider `Avgas` availability,or consider a turbine...
sycamore is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 14:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 10
From: Ansião (PT)
Have you any estimation of the number of hours you will be flying annually?
Depending on the answer, and the already mentioned issue of fuel availability, a single turboprop might be more attractive than the current twin piston option.
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 14:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 1
From: In the boot of my car!
Have you any estimation of the number of hours you will be flying annually?
Depending on the answer, and the already mentioned issue of fuel availability, a single turboprop might be more attractive than the current twin piston option.
If his budget is older Seneca Five maybe $400K max what single turbine can you buy sub $500K maybe a Piper turbine conversion ? certainly not a TBM .


My experience with planes is solely as a passenger in private travel, more so with light jets.
If your budget is up to a $million you might pick up an older CJ1 jet. It will hold its value is easy on parts, economical and can be operated by one pilot


Pace
Pace is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 14:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 10
From: Ansião (PT)
Pace, you certainly are better placed than myself in this discussion. Still, I am afraid the T/S is not, or insufficiently, considering running cost, looking only at initial budget.
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2016 | 17:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 1
From: In the boot of my car!
Meldex

That's a twin turbine not single! The engine times left Will very much determine the price

Pace
Pace is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.