Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

AFE Air Law Problem

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

AFE Air Law Problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th December 2015 | 08:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: Oxford
Do you think that was deliberate or as MJ implied a cockup?
tmmorris is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2015 | 10:38
  #22 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
Hold my hands up to be totally wrong, not kept up with the changes as I should have done!
AIUI now, in the UK you do not have to abide by the VFR cruising levels, in Europe I believe You do!
The semicircular level system replaces the quadrantal system and brings the UK into line with ICAO standards applied elsewhere around the world. VFR and IFR aircraft are allocated different levels to fly at:

IFR flights use whole 1000's of feet (e.g. 1000, 3000 etc when flying eastbound, and 2000, 4000 etc. when flying westbound)
VFR flights use the intermediate 500ft levels (e.g. 3500, 5500 etc. when flying eastbound and 4500, 6500 when flying westbound)
For VFR flights, compliance with the cruising levels remains good practice but is not mandatory.

Last edited by foxmoth; 6th December 2015 at 12:00.
foxmoth is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2015 | 11:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: London
I don't have an IFR chart immediately to hand, but, if I remember correctly, isn't the entire area between Cherbourg Zone and Rennes Zone criss-crossed with Airways from about FL50 upwards?
My IFR map indicates that there is a criss cross of ATS routes, you are definitely right. But to the best of my interpretations they do not appear to be a classed airspace. Perhaps someone can enlighten us? To the best of my (perhaps poor?) understanding the class D airspace on my route started at FL115, and whilst there are lower level ATS routes they are not "controlled" classed airspace.

Either way - during my trip I was in contact with ATC at all times, and it didn't appear that I was within controlled airspace even if I was (no clearance, no headings, no requests, just the weird statement posted above).

Foxmoth! You almost had me thinking that I needed to re-review the privileges of my license... I was absolutely sure that I was not allowed to do that! But anyhow - soon I hope to be fully IR qualified! :-)

best.
alex
alex90 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2015 | 15:57
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 4
From: Yorkshire
Originally Posted by tmmorris
Do you think that was deliberate or as MJ implied a cockup?
Many journalists have fallen for the conspiracy theory of government. I do assure you that they would produce more accurate work if they adhered to the cock-up theory.
— Bernard Ingham.


MJ
Mach Jump is offline  
Reply
Old 6th December 2015 | 21:09
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: Oxford
I have to admit I take the same view of the bosses at work...
tmmorris is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.