Manchester Low Level Corridor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Age: 64
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Manchester Low Level Corridor
We are hoping to use the corridor later this week - weather permitting - for a trip from Prestwick to down South. I've read the article in Fly on Track, but it is a few years old now, and I'm comfortable with the height limit. Any - to use a golf saying - local rules that we should be aware of?
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Use the listening squawk 7366 and monitor Manchester Approach 118.575.
North of Warrington, I'd also monitor Barton Information 120.250 just to get an idea of what other traffic is about, especially as there can be a fair amount routing via Wigan going east-west just to the north of the low level.
Keep your eyes peeled!
North of Warrington, I'd also monitor Barton Information 120.250 just to get an idea of what other traffic is about, especially as there can be a fair amount routing via Wigan going east-west just to the north of the low level.
Keep your eyes peeled!
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No need to avoid the LLR. I've played in there for decades and never had a 'moment'. Even met the BBMF in there once!
You can actually go quite low if you want to - just avoid the built up areas. But it's a doddle at, say, 1210 feet QNH!
You can actually go quite low if you want to - just avoid the built up areas. But it's a doddle at, say, 1210 feet QNH!
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One tip perhaps, mark it on your chart with a permanent marker pen. It is not just the southerly parallel bit, but the wide bit at the north end as well.
I approached it at 3500ft from the north, after missing Warton MATZ, and the 2452ft Radio Mast, thinking I had about 6nm to go, when I realised I was over Wigan with just one mile to go.... The old Cessna held together well in the ensuing dive....
These days it is 1300ft on the Manch QNH., and yes Liverpool (and Manchester) are most useful for class D Transits, as long as you are not crossing their Glide-Slopes.
I approached it at 3500ft from the north, after missing Warton MATZ, and the 2452ft Radio Mast, thinking I had about 6nm to go, when I realised I was over Wigan with just one mile to go.... The old Cessna held together well in the ensuing dive....
These days it is 1300ft on the Manch QNH., and yes Liverpool (and Manchester) are most useful for class D Transits, as long as you are not crossing their Glide-Slopes.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norf West by West
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you seen this?
This link from NATs, produced by one of our GA friends in Manchester ATC might be useful
https://www.caa.co.uk/docs/299/Manch...008NOV_CAA.pdf
TTWTDI
https://www.caa.co.uk/docs/299/Manch...008NOV_CAA.pdf
TTWTDI
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any - to use a golf saying - local rules that we should be aware of?
It's safer to get a clearance so that you can fly higher and be informed about others.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Soaring - that's just nonsense! And it's spreading mis-information. I am a local, and flew it very regularly from 1978 to a couple of years ago.
Never experienced, or heard of, any 'incidents' let alone near-collisions in the LLR in 35 years of using it! If it's good enough for the BBMF Lanc, Spit, and Hurricane in formation it's good enough for any GA pilot.
Use it or lose it!
Never experienced, or heard of, any 'incidents' let alone near-collisions in the LLR in 35 years of using it! If it's good enough for the BBMF Lanc, Spit, and Hurricane in formation it's good enough for any GA pilot.
Use it or lose it!
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,597
Received 450 Likes
on
239 Posts
The corridor is low and narrow placing you below minimum safe altitude
As far as "minimum safe altitude" goes, that term doesn't exist under ICAO. Minimum Sector Altitude (if that's what you actually meant to refer to), refers to IFR and this is exclusively a VFR route.
As a "notified route" the 1,000 ft rule doesn't apply either.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it's good enough for the BBMF Lanc, Spit, and Hurricane in formation it's good enough for any GA pilot.
Inside controlled airspace you receive traffic information or separation. Outside that you are on your own to see and avoid. But how to avoid if you fail to see?
The limitations of see and avoid are clear: Traffic information should be issued to allow pilots to conduct a directed search.
Why not fly a more direct route through controlled airspace instead?
In this case it is clear which I would one I would prefer any day.
I would only use that corridor if I have no real alternative.
As far as "minimum safe altitude" goes, that term doesn't exist under ICAO.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay that was a typo. Should have read: "In hazy and poor VMC it's wise to NOT fly below MSA. This airspace suggests getting a clearance from ATC so that you safely avoid terrain and obstacles."
Sure - We have similar corridors over here too. In the event that clearance is not immediately available then this is a fuel saving shortcut. But it's never my preferred route for all the reasons I mentioned earlier. That's all I'm saying.
and why many of us who use it are glad of its existence?
Last edited by soaringhigh650; 22nd May 2015 at 13:15.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although you don't need to talk to Manchester, but just listen on their frequency, I am sure I have heard Manchester say something along the lines of.... 'Be aware there is a lot of Northbound traffic in the low-level corridor today'. Who it was addressed to, or if it was a general announcement, I just cannot recall.
Obviously do not rely upon this 'service'.
Obviously do not rely upon this 'service'.