Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Flying G reg experimentals in Europe

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Flying G reg experimentals in Europe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jan 2015, 14:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: belgium
Age: 64
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying G reg experimentals in Europe

Hi all

Am looking at a potential purchase of a G-regged experimental.
Want to base it in Belgium and fly it across Europe.

Does anybody know if there are restrictions?
vandereydt is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2015, 14:50
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,217
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
There's no such thing as experimental on the G reg.

Do you mean Permit to Fly?

If so, most of what you want to know is here...

http://www.lightaircraftassociation....20Aircraft.pdf
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2015, 16:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Plumpton Green
Age: 79
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Belgium will only allow a Foreign registered 'permit to fly aircraft' in their airspace for 30 days in a year.
patowalker is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2015, 18:19
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: belgium
Age: 64
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was made to understand that as of April 2015 there would be a european legislation that accepts all experimentals, permits to fly in all countries

anybody heard of this ?
Belgium?
vandereydt is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2015, 18:25
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,217
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
I'd be delighted to be proven wrong, but I think that's pure optimistic rumour.
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2015, 19:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

The Belgian 30 days rule, is thirty flying days valid for one year.


Ie the plane can fly at any time in Belgium during the 12 months, but with a maximum of 30 different days.


If you check your logbook, 30 days in a year is actually quite a bit (particularly for permit, so good VFR, flying).


Additionally (though I never said this!!!) if flying out of small airfields and keeping clear of anything controlled - nobody would know anyway if you flew more than 30 days...

Last edited by Sam Rutherford; 24th Jan 2015 at 19:33. Reason: tried and failed to add a smiley!
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2015, 09:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of plane are you talking about?

At some point in time, it would be potentially better to register it under OO. Don't forget that you will need a UK inspector at east once a year.

Anyway, if you are willing to operate a non OO registered experimental (or a G permit to fly) in Belgium, you will need to apply for a permission every year.
Aanvraagformulier - Formulieren - FOD Mobiliteit
or
http://www.mobilit.belgium.be/fr/bin...467-207147.doc

Also you need to pay 96EUR a year for this authorisation, be limited to 30 flying days during this year, submit a flight plan for every flight (also send it to a specific e-mail address) and send at the end of the year a report with the trips that you made.

Last edited by ploucandco; 25th Jan 2015 at 09:47. Reason: remove link that was already given in a previous post
ploucandco is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2015, 15:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,784
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Belgium?
Heard a rumour today that most or even all of the Belgian "circulaires" ("omzendbrieven") ("bulletins") are to be rewritten and redistributed shortly. Wait and see.
Jan Olieslagers is online now  
Old 25th Jan 2015, 15:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "Experimental" aircraft I have flown were given a special flight authority, to permit flight for a very specific purpose, usually testing a new feature or design change, which required flight testing. For this, I must specify the reason for the flight (the "experiment"), and a flight test plan to be followed. It is nearly unheard of that such aircraft cross boarders, other than to attend airshows (Farnborough, for example). The flight permits were both calendar and regionally limited. I can certainly understand why a nation would want to restrict the flight of aircraft which were doing an experiment.

I've also flown amateur built aircraft, which were certainly not "experimental" (I hope!). I know that Americans seem to stick "Experimental" on their amateur built aircraft, I really wonder why. What's the "experiment"? The FAA system, I suppose - apparently not followed elsewhere.
9 lives is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2015, 04:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What's the "experiment"? The FAA system, I suppose - apparently not followed elsewhere.
Not quite so, the Australian and NZ systems are similar, in Australia Experimental Amateur Built is one of the several categories within Part 21, Experimental.
Again, in Australia the current legislation superseded the AABA -- Australian Amateur Built Aircraft system, which was highly bureaucratic and restrictive.

Many of the Experiment Amateur Built aircraft are highly customized, from basic designs, many are unique designs, but they all have one thing in common, they do not qualify for a Certificate of Airworthiness. Indeed, by definition, they are not airworthy, because they are not built to a certified design and under a production certificate.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2015, 07:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,217
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
In terms of international air law, the most correct term is "Sub-Icao", that is to say, aeroplanes which for some reason or another are ineligible for issue of an ICAO compliant Certificate of Airworthiness.

In practice that term isn't used in any nation's domestic regulations, and every country has its own system of labelling and permissions.

In the USA, pretty much everything sub-ICAO, from a kitplane to a new Boeing that hasn't for a CofA yet, is labelled "Experimental". Their approach is built somewhat upon the amount of empty space they have there, and basically lets you build and fly whatever you like, so long as you don't fly it over any habitation. Part of their rules require you to paint the word "experimental" in clear view on the aeroplane. It is a particular approach that hasn't found favour in many other countries. Some of them still use the term "experimental" but every country which uses the word, means something different by it.

In Britain, sub-ICAO aircraft fall into several categories.

(1) True flight test. These are operated under "B-conditions", possibly supported by an EASA "Permit to Fly", probably not. they will either have a standard G-ABCD registration, or have a B-conditions number, which will look something like G-12-34. You don't see those used much nowadays. Permissions to fly a B-conditions aeroplane in any country but Britain are almost impossible to obtain.

(2) Permit to Fly. This is the lower UK-only equivalent to a CofA. They all look about the same on the paperwork, but have numerous flavours, including...

- Microlight / type approved (e.g. a CTSW)
- Microlight / amateur built (e.g. an X'Air)
- Microlight / type accepted. (e.g. a Tiger Cub)
- Amateur built (most of the LAA fleet)
- Vintage or ex military (any civilian owned Spitfire, most Austers, Condors....)
- CAA issued (could be anything, but most likely some temporary issue on something stuggling with the paperwork to help a company out. I have seen paperwork showing a VC10 on a permit, but the biggest in my logbook was an Islander for a ferry before fitting out).

(3) Deregulated

- This is SSDR microlights, hang-gliders, powered paragliders... For all reasonable purposes, there is no paperwork.


I think that the original poster, in referring (wrongly but understandably) to "experimental", meant "amateur built" (either light or microlight), for which my original answer is still correct.

G

Last edited by Genghis the Engineer; 26th Jan 2015 at 07:30.
Genghis the Engineer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.