Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Creation of new flying schools effectively suspended for 3 years?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Creation of new flying schools effectively suspended for 3 years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2014, 22:23
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think that many of the regular contributors on here have been involved in the fruitless battle against CAA/JAA/EASA 'Red Tape' for many years, long before we started calling it a 'Chalenge'. Only now do we apear to be making some small progress, but I don't know if it is too little/too late.


MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 20th Nov 2014 at 22:36.
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2014, 06:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: France
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about NPPL?
Would the CAA accept an application from a new organisation willing to train for NPPL only?
As a LAPL can be obtained on the basis of a NPPL, that would be a solution to train most private pilots

Last edited by 172510; 22nd Nov 2014 at 09:40.
172510 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2014, 17:17
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Would the CAA accept an application from a new organisation willing to train for NPPL only?
A nice thought, but for the time being at least, the NPPL/A SSEA can only be issued until 8th April 2015. After that, training will be only for the LAPL, although you will now be able to continue using your NPPL on EASA aircraft until 2018.


MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 23rd Nov 2014 at 02:56. Reason: Corrected typo.
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 07:51
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would the CAA accept an application from a new organisation willing to train for NPPL only?
For the NPPL microlight you don’t even need to do that!

All you need is a qualified instructor, suitable aeroplane and airfield to learn from. Which is the same as it was in the UK pre europe.

No wonder there was 1800 two seat microlights sold in Europe last year.
Mickey Kaye is online now  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 11:51
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: anywhere
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 172510
What about NPPL?
Would the CAA accept an application from a new organisation willing to train for NPPL only?
As a LAPL can be obtained on the basis of a NPPL, that would be a solution to train most private pilots
You have to be an RTF to provide training for the NPPL(A) SSEA anyway. Any RTF that trains for an NPPL(A) will be able to train for LAPL(A) after 8/04/15.
Prop swinger is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2014, 07:42
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MJ

Is that no new NPPL SSEAs after April, so no more conversion route via NPPL to LAPL. Or if someone has an NPPL M can they still get an SSEA on it after April 2015?
xrayalpha is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2014, 11:40
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Technically you can't add an SSEA class rating to an NPPL(M), you convert it to an NPPL(A)SSEA

From 8th April 2015, if you already have an NPPL(A)SSEA you will continue to be able to convert that to a LAPL.

As far as I know, the original CAA policy that no NPPL(A)s will be issued after 7th April 2015 has not changed.


MJ

Ps. In my opinion it would make sense to continue to issue the NPPL(A), if only for those who just want to fly Annex II SSEA aircraft, but also to ease the transition from NPPL(M) to the LAPL.

Of course, there is still time for this to change before April. Four months is a long time in the world of CAA/EASA!

Last edited by Mach Jump; 24th Nov 2014 at 12:37. Reason: Added Ps.
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2014, 22:36
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's a question that occured to me when reading the Information Notice.

The requirement is to be amended so that an examiner may test a student to whom they have given up to 25% of the instruction required for the licence, rating or certificate.
What, exactly will this mean?

25% of the total time the student takes to complete the course?

25% of the total 'dual' time the student takes to complete the course?

25% of the minimum time required for the course?

25% of the minimum 'dual' time required for the course?


MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 26th Nov 2014 at 01:46.
Mach Jump is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.