Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Do schools teach people to be pilots?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Do schools teach people to be pilots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Sep 2014, 08:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do schools teach people to be pilots?

Or just sell a course of flying lessons?


I'm thinking about leisure flying (not commercial) and the large number of learners who post questions on here that, whilst they are sensible questions for a learner to ask, are questions that really should be answered by their instructor, by info given them by the school, or by reading around the subject.


Are instructors so pressed for time that they don't have time to help students by covering all the flying general knowledge that they need? Don't they sit and have a coffee together from time to time? Don't they chat about flying and how great it is?


Whats going on?
Heston is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 09:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,786
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Flight schools have one mission and that is to get you to pass the exams. Once you have your licence, their job is done.
Once you have the licence, then can you begin to learn being a pilot.
Jan Olieslagers is online now  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 09:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What Jan Olieslagers says.

The school has no idea if you will compete at aeros, get an IR or fly a Cub with your feet hanging out an a big grin. All it is about is to get your license and then you go off and learn the bit of aviation you like best.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 09:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London
Age: 55
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever they teach they have to and as far as I see, succeed to instil the ethos of what it is to be a pilot otherwise post ppl far too many will think their learning is done.

Don't forget a lot of people like the anonymity of posting questions on forums rather than asking real people face to face.
Camargue is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 09:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tamworth, UK / Nairobi, Kenya
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think it's the school's responsibility.
I think it's the student's.
As a student you can get as little or as much as you want from the courses available.
I took a class for ground school, I also got several books on the subject, and I took a video course as well. That was how I prepared myself for the knowledge parts.
When flight training, between lessons, I used to practice in the chair at home, replaying in my mind the previous lesson (or two). And I read in the books about whatever it was that my instructor was teaching me, and what I expected him (I asked) to teach me in the next lesson. That way I was prepared for that next lesson when it came.

If you go through life expecting to be taught everything without having to learn, you'll only ever be mediocre at whatever you do.

If you really love something, like flying, then why not reach out and grab every bit of flying knowledge that you can?
darkroomsource is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 10:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure some schools are better than others at this.

I am quite happy with the 'extracurricular' time my school spends with me.

Part of the problem is that some students just want to get their license and 'get on with it' - they don't see the license as part off their 'real flying' but as an ordeal which has to be passed. Those students would be unhappy with a school which is more 'holistic'. And vice versa.

Unfortunately, whether what the student wants = what the school offers may not be immediately apparent after a trial flight.

After lurking here and on other forums, I felt much better 'armed' w.r.t. having some trial lessons and what I wanted to do - and hence what I looked or. Maybe many students don't do that prior research and end up making poor choices. I was initially in the 'get on with it' camp but firmly moved across.

I think it does show the importance of choosing the right school - something most of us only do once and therefore are not necessarily very good at.

That said, this being an anonymous forum, a. (as mentioned) some people take comfort from that as it enables them to ask questions they may be embarrassed to ask face to face and b. not all posters are what they seem and some 'students' may never have actually taken a lesson...

B.
Baikonour is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 10:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 405
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no idea what British flying schools are like -- and I mention that because most of the posters here seem to be British -- but I must say I've been amazed by some of the questions that pop up on this forum from time to time.

A lot of it seems to be basic stuff that any licensed pilot should already know, or which a student pilot should be asking his instructor.

Nevertheless, I wouldn't want to deter anyone from asking questions here if there's stuff they don't know and need to know.

As one of my theory teachers used to say: "There are no dumb questions in this classroom. The only dumb question is the one you fail to ask."
On Track is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 12:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South-East, United Kingdom
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my experience of 9 years, and having done PPL training, IMCR, Night qualification, and renewals of JAR and FAA licenses with a few different airfield organisations in South East UK, I would disagree with Jan and Rod1. Thats not to say its not their experience, but it isnt mine.

The problem is though, that as a PPL sometimes you are at home, on the train, whatever, and you arent in talking distance of your instructor. You could try him or her on the phone, but either they are flying / with another student, or for longer questions, they might need to charge you the clubs going rate. Therefore it is easier to test and gain understanding from a variety of sources, including on here. Of course the advice cannot be taken as gospel, even from a qualified instructor, as he is not your instructor, delivering your schools syllabus. But its fine to ask, and improve your knowledge anyhow.

The other problem is that most schools or communities have little time or resource to deal with post-PPL subjects (e.g. going somewhere more than 45 minutes away, information on the specifics of a certain airfield, or operation like filing a flight plan or a GAR), or even the most basic like how to use the GPS or even what tablet naviation application they recommend). Most of that is beyond what the schoool exists to provide, but if you are at a good school, then beyond the helpful people here, there will be local pilots who will give you their 'advice' for free.

On forums like this, you can be inspired by what other people have done and begin to think beyond your basic PPL and see what other opportunities exist. After my PPL, I found Peter's trip reports incredibly inspiring - Peter's Trip Reports
piperarcher is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 12:12
  #9 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 427 Likes on 226 Posts
If you look at who is doing the teaching, you might be able to work out the answer.

Many PPL FIs are low time hour builders with not much experience outside of teaching the basics to others.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 12:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Schools and teacher teach the pilot-to-be how to survive the next 100 flight hours after exam, no more, no less.

The rising questions from students are signature of two current things: first, the tendency to not use your brain but Google or a Forum; second, the bull**** of having faith in something we currently encounter in discussions as swarm intelligence - you do not have to think, because the big thingie around you will tell you. Both are dramatic and stupid, but that is what history will measure us on in 20 years.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 13:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think there are two elements to it. First - as said above - some people come here and ask questions as "students" when they aren't. This isn't a bad thing and asking questions on the internet is easier than phoning or physically going to a club and asking the questions in person (which can be quite intimidating). I suspect that an awful lot of the really daft questions fall into that category.

The other thing is that when I'm with my FI I'm normally pretty focussed on whatever he's teaching me at the time and so thats where my questions will sit. Generic questions on some of the finer points of - for example - air law or even on the technicalities of aircraft hire in the dim and distant future when I qualify are not at the front of my mind. Lastly FIs are like taxi's, always on the clock! Small or obscure questions are often better asked of experienced pilots for free rather than an expensive FI who has another student waiting...
AndrewMcD is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 13:31
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the general consensus is that the answer to my original question is, "No, schools don't teach students to be pilots, just to pass the exams."


Which is kinda what I thought. And I think its wrong. You can see it from the purely commercial point of view of the school, but its why so many PPLs give up flying soon after they start - they're not really equipped to go on and enjoy their flying.
Heston is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 13:44
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South-East, United Kingdom
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

So the general consensus is that the answer to my original question is, "No, schools don't teach students to be pilots, just to pass the exams."
I personally dont agree with that as I have seen clubs go the extra mile. And you could consider training for am IR(Restricted) rating, or a cross-channel checkout as a formal school led way of getting further than just passing the exams.

Which is kinda what I thought. And I think its wrong. You can see it from the purely commercial point of view of the school, but its why so many PPLs give up flying soon after they start - they're not really equipped to go on and enjoy their flying.
That I do agree. In fact I would go further and say it is not the training, and not even the inclusion of not being shown something like SkyDemon as part of the official syllabus, its the fact that a lot of flying school aircraft are not always as attractive as an equivelant privately maintained aircraft, and the whole charging scheme, coupled with the scheduling schemes where the previous renter came back late with empty fuel tanks, much more of a reason to give up x hours after passing. If I didnt get into part-ownership of my Piper Archer II, then I'd have given up a long time ago.

Edit: I was also going to say that using a whizz-wheel, hoping for correctly forecast wind/weather information, and arching your back over the instrument panel constantly hunting for towns and lakes etc in my opinion is not the fun part of flying. Having good skills but coupled with use of some cockpit GPS device, and confidence in it as a situational awareness tool leaves you to a) look out the window more for other aircraft and not things on the ground b) find the fun in the flying, and it should be fun.
piperarcher is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 13:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Heston:

I've been very surprised by the way our british and european comrades do their teaching. I can't speak for all schools in the USA but I think we do things a little differently.

When I was teaching, I would always ask what my student planned to do with his flying. Some just wanted an interesting hobby, others wanted to have a career in flying, and there were other reasons too.

But I did try to mold their minds into the mind of a pilot. To start thinking like a pilot even before they got their hands on the controls of the plane. To put SAFETY FIRST.

Thinking like a pilot might be something as, when you are out walking around, always observe the winds and know which way they are coming from. It becomes a good habit. And so much more.

My students would always take a bit longer to actually be ready for their PPL flying test. But they would always be ahead of the game farther down the path.

And then there were the books I would assign, over and above what the FAA thinks is needed. And sitting for hours on the instructor's bench to watch landings and takeoffs while listening to an aviation band radio for the "LING" (lingo as you might imagine)>


So, there you go. I've been attacked and seen others attack similar views on this forum, but its just that they have been 'brought up' in a different way.

So, good luck HESTON. Interview your instructors thoroughly. And if they don't have time, you don't want them as instructors!
glendalegoon is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 14:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
"No, schools don't teach students to be pilots, just to pass the exams."
Perhaps that is a very good reason to learn at a "Flying Club" rather than a "Flying School". Like the RAF, more may be learned in the Crew room than the Class room.
Whopity is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 14:26
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Like the RAF, more may be learned in the Crew room than the Class room.
I don't know about the RAF, but most of what I needed to learn about flying, I learnt on board of aircraft. From instructors and colleagues.

But I did try to mold their minds into the mind of a pilot.
Although I have been flying for more than 35 years (and instructing for over 20) I have no idea what "the mind of a pilot" might be. All I have encountered is a bunch of individuals who chose to fly aeroplanes (and gliders and hang gliders) out of their free will for a multitude of reasons and with a multitude of different aptitudes and mindsets. I call every one among them a pilot.
what next is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 14:31
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Posts: 31
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In my opinion it all depends on where you learn to fly. Even at my old school (Cabair) you would still get quite a few of the instructors (mainly the older ones as the younger ones generally were just waiting for an airline job) quite willing to sit there and discuss your flying future and the options available.
AndoniP is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 14:48
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glendalegoon and Whopity - totally agree with those sentiments. I should confess - I am a flying instructor and I work in a club set-up, not at a commercial school. To me going the extra mile (assigning extra books is a good example) is really important if it makes the difference between folk who are as safe as they can be and are having as much fun as they can on the one hand, and on the other hand people who see getting the licence as the end point not the beginning.


Thanks everybody for helping me be confident that I'm right to think the way I do
Heston is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 15:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This may be a good time to revisit the old 'How do I choose a school' question.

The standard response is "Don't pay up front. Go for some trial lessons and see which one you like. And don't pay up front. No, really, don't pay up front."

Maybe we could give some better guidance, e.g.:
- Find out how long the instructor(s) has been instructing for
- Will you have just one or several instructors?
- Will you be able to try out different types of planes (if you wanted to)?
- Will they be able to help you gain other ratings post-PPL?
- Ask them if they organise fly-outs or if you can 'sit in' (or just participate) on club flights
- Find out if they have any experience (even if they have 'just tried for fun') taildragging, aerobatics, strip flying, gliding, seaplanes...
- What is their opinion on the various books available? Can they lend you Stick and Rudder?
- Do they read the internet forums?

B.
Baikonour is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2014, 15:43
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,028
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
No, I can't lend you 'Stick and Rudder'
I am on my third copy, as people 'forget' to return it.
I can tell you where to BUY a copy.
I'm not on the clock, you can ask me questions.
I instruct in a CLUB, for expenses only; you may buy me a beer after the flying is finished for the day.
Piper.Classique is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.