Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

NPPL/MICROLIGHT DUAL REVALIDATION

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

NPPL/MICROLIGHT DUAL REVALIDATION

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2014, 19:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,818
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
xrayalpha wrote:
In the past Microlight Examiners have automatically been able to revalidate other Class ratings in the NPPL, in addition to Microlight Class ratings, however this is no longer the case.
Huh? I well recall raising this issue and the CAA agreeing a solution. If I recall correctly (it must have been at least 5 years ago), the Examiner simply needed to ask the BMAA to support the inclusion of 'R' Examiner privileges when the Examiner applied to the CAA for re-authorisation.

Please advise whichever Microlight FE, who came up with the statement you quote, to contact the BMAA.
BEagle is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2014, 19:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"In the past Microlight Examiners have automatically been able to revalidate other Class ratings in the NPPL, in addition to Microlight Class ratings, however this is no longer the case. Examiners can only sign certificates for other NPPL Class ratings, SSEA and SLMG, if their Examiner Authority specifically includes those Classes. If so the relevant Classes will be printed on their Examiner Authorities"


This is the full text that xrayalpha is quoting from - its from a BMAA Instructor and Examiner Bulletin issued earlier today. I guess it sorta means what you say BEagle?
Heston is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2014, 19:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,818
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Not really. The 'R' examiner requirement is for authorisation to conduct revalidation 'by experience' sign-offs and provides the CAA with adequate assurance that the examiner understands the associated requirements....

Thus if a Microlight FE is not qualified to fly SSEA / SLMG aircraft, authority to include sign-off approval for SSEA / SLMG revalidation can be achieved by applying for 'R' examiner authorisation.

BMAA should be able to advise further.
BEagle is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2014, 20:18
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle,

Good to know you were on the ball five or so years ago.

Presumably, there has been no change in the law that you have been made aware of, or consulted about. So this is just "someone at the CAA" deciding to change the procedures, even though the "rules" haven't changed. And that is why this is a surprise.

So, yes, I can sign someone off for a M if they have 11 hours SSEA and one hour micro, but I cannot now sign off their SSEA at the same time.

Even in central Scotland, that means a 50+ miles round trip to find an SSEA R examiner. Or do I apply for SSEA R, pay another CAA fee and then start charging people (I sign for free at the moment, since I get my R free with the paid for G!)

To be frank, do the BMAA care a stuff? It is SSEA revalidations - which are outside their patch - which will suffer, since SSEA Rs can still sign Ms. I think!
xrayalpha is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.