Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

There Seem's to be A Change in Attitude?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

There Seem's to be A Change in Attitude?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2014, 11:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There Seem's to be A Change in Attitude?

Flying yesterday, I heard at least four incidents of CAS bust's and they were all accepted as genuine mistakes by those ATSU's involved. At least two culprits said sorry for the incursion & were given headings to exit ASAP. One was even two miles adrift.

I hope there is an acceptance that these are genuine mistakes and investigation/prosecution would not serve any purpose, as you will never legislate away people making mistakes. No more than the death penalty has ever stopped a murder.
PA28181 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 13:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they always have been very understanding to be honest.

If it was a council of pilots that was in charge of the discipline stick I suspect there would be an awful lot more punishments dealt out than there is currently.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 13:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a basic rule:

Under no circumstances may one controller permit an aircraft to enter another's airspace without proper coordination. Coordination can be accomplished by several means; i.e., radar handoff, automated information transfer, verbal, point-out, and by prearranged coordination procedures identified in a facility directive that clearly describe the correct application. Airspace boundaries should not be permitted to become barriers to the efficient movement of traffic. In addition, complete coordination, awareness of traffic flow, and understanding of each position's responsibility concerning penetration of another's airspace cannot be overemphasized.
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 14:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'650 - what exactly is the relevance of your "rule"?

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 14:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are hundreds of airspace infringements each year, when you look at the GA occurrence reports. But less than half a dozen prosecutions.

If you are talking to an ATSU then that will likely stop it going any further (providing it is only minor).

The ones that seem to be prosecuted are when the pilot isn't talking to anyone, cuts right through the approach or take-off paths causing massive inconvenience and tries to cover it up by turning off the transponder.
wb9999 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 15:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 sheds, you are right. I misread. I was meant to say:
"Would you stop infringing my Class A dog food."
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 19:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PA28181

No more than the death penalty has ever stopped a murder.
How do you know that? Having a timely death penalty without 15-20 years of appeals would probably have more effect than not having any death penalty at all. The only way to stop murder is to eliminate humanity. I think we're stuck with murder for a little while longer.
Desert185 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 20:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never quite got the death penalty thing. There are people who want to bring it back as it was a deterrent when we had it. If it was a deterrent why did people still murder each other? It didn't work.

I am however aware that not having the death penalty deosn't work either. A better man than me can work out the solution to that.
thing is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 20:54
  #9 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hold on a minute. Capital punishment for airspace infringements seems a tad harsh.

SGC
 
Old 6th Mar 2014, 21:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bet if you trialled it though you would still get infringements.
thing is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 21:10
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do you know that?
I'm not going to respond to this.

My quip regarding the death penalty was not meant to start a a debate about something that has no place here. But as with open forums, major thread drift and misquoting go hand-in-hand.

Please stick to the point of the OP.
PA28181 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 21:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the death penalty was not meant to start a a debate
I think you're wrong on that count. Back in the day the UK had more crimes punishable by death than any other country, it seemed that any crime could be debated to the point where it was punishable by death if that was the flavour of the month.

sorry, just couldn't resist a further mis-quoting and thread drift
RTN11 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 21:31
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love thread drift. I once got a thread on another forum diverted in just over two pages from a question about guitar string gauges to the recipe for soda bread. Then they started arguing about that.
thing is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 21:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On topic though, I used to work Bournemouth a lot, and actually heard them clear a could of near infringers to enter the zone just before they were about to infringe, even though they hadn't asked for it. I guess it saved on the paperwork if there was absolutely no conflicting traffic, and the clearance came with a restriction to remain within x miles of the zone boundary. Heard it on more than one occasion though.

Then again, I did also hear a weekend flyer from a private strip, when they asked him what service he required, he said "the normal one" they said, "do you mean a basic service", and he said "I'll just have whatever everyone else is having" so perhaps they're not dealing with the best bunch down that way.
RTN11 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2014, 21:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then again, I did also hear a weekend flyer from a private strip, when they asked him what service he required, he said "the normal one" they said, "do you mean a basic service", and he said "I'll just have whatever everyone else is having" so perhaps they're not dealing with the best bunch down that way.
Classic!

Best (or worst) I ever heard was some guy on East Midlands frequency who when asked to give his position said 'Overhead Langar' to which East Mids came back immediately with 'Langar is live and dropping right now suggest you get out of the overhead ASAP.'

I sometimes wonder, as I do with drivers, how some folk managed to get a license.
thing is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 08:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hold on a minute. Capital punishment for airspace infringements seems a tad harsh.
True, but it would stop repeat offending.
BillieBob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.