Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Cherokee or Tecnam?

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Cherokee or Tecnam?

Old 9th Feb 2014, 05:32
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 326
You might be right BPF. Time will tell. In the case of a P2002JF, built as a classic all-metal design with no mandated major replacements, it's hard to see why a competent LAME armed with an Aircraft Spruce catalogue couldn't keep it in the air indefinitely.

Back from a morning's run and the opportunity to do some direct comparisons with the type of fleet you mention. I've loved all the aircraft I've owned and flown but I think you'd have to be a determined grouch not to return with a smile on your dial after an hour in the P2002.

I forgot to mention in the earlier post that, apart from the non-decorative nature of the P2002 roll protection, the sliding forward-latching canopy does allow the canopy to be opened in flight.
tecman is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 06:28
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Below the stratosphere
Posts: 70
Back to the original question.

BPF says the quality of the instruction is prime and I'd second that.

During your PPL, the aircraft type is not really important, relatively, IMHO.

It's a shame you don't have a C152 available, as they tend to be a little less expensive and are also a good learning platform.

Whatever people say about Cherokee handling, they are safe. Very safe. Very, very, very ......

Given that stability and agility tend to be at the opposite ends of a continuum, perhaps it is not so surprising that the handling is less than razor sharp, but neither will they do anything nasty, unless seriously abused, so it makes your workload a little lighter and builds your confidence on pre-PPL x-countries, if you choose the PA28.

On the other hand, if the Tecmnam operator has better instruction, I'd go there.
Three Thousand Rule is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 16:48
  #43 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sky
Posts: 9
Thanks for all the comments! I went for a flight in the Tecnam on Friday, it seems like a nice aircraft (although several things were not working). I am not entirely sure that I like the school that much though, it seems slightly less professional than the other one. So I think I might try the Cherokee too and see how that is.

On a side note, if I complete some exams with one school, then change to a different school would I have to redo those exams? Or can they be transferred over?
captain echo is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2014, 10:45
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Archerfield
Posts: 3
Tecnam RG

Hello all, Flightscope Aviation Queensland has a Tecnam P92 RG and we love it!
Flightscopeaviation is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2014, 21:13
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 360
Flying such a light airframe with low inertia and sensitive controls requires good piloting technique. I found that certain things which you can do in a 172 and get away with it simply will not cut the mustard in the Tecnam P2008. That does not mean it is harder to fly. The systems are far newer and simpler than a 172/Pa28's so there is less management required. So you can devote more effort into flying the plane. That cannot be a bad thing.
flyinkiwi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.