Landing in a tree...video
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Downwind
Age: 40
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Preliminary report here.
I'm saying nothing (this time) 
According to the pilot’s statement and an on-board video, the engine experienced a partial loss of power after takeoff. While executing a crosswind turn, the engine experienced a total loss of power. The pilot maneuvered to execute a forced landing into trees.
Last edited by Ryan5252; 17th Aug 2013 at 09:39.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Inside the roster matrix
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow! So many other options.
There isn't a problem using a long runway for a bit of fun, but always have an 'out' and be ready to convert speed to height or the right field.
There were two great fields - one straight ahead and one off to the 10 o'clock.
If you really had to, turn left and land behind the black car traveling left to right - the road / highway was clear.
Clearly not the right mind-set and nothing was planned.
There isn't a problem using a long runway for a bit of fun, but always have an 'out' and be ready to convert speed to height or the right field.
There were two great fields - one straight ahead and one off to the 10 o'clock.
If you really had to, turn left and land behind the black car traveling left to right - the road / highway was clear.
Clearly not the right mind-set and nothing was planned.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: hong kong
Age: 49
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Natural selection dropped the ball there.
There were options available and there would have been many more with a bit more altitude. It takes a minute to formulate a plan for an unfamiliar runway. If flying from home base there should be plenty of preplanned options.
Glad they made it out in one piece.
There were options available and there would have been many more with a bit more altitude. It takes a minute to formulate a plan for an unfamiliar runway. If flying from home base there should be plenty of preplanned options.
Glad they made it out in one piece.
Last edited by subsonicsubic; 18th Aug 2013 at 04:52. Reason: grammar :(
Actually found it difficult to follow what was happening here - everything seemed to happen much faster than I would expect (yes, I know everybody says that!).
The wide angle on the camera makes it very difficult to judge altitude/speed. I suspect that when the engine stopped they were much lower and had fewer options than it first appears. Silly or not, nice to know they made it.
The wide angle on the camera makes it very difficult to judge altitude/speed. I suspect that when the engine stopped they were much lower and had fewer options than it first appears. Silly or not, nice to know they made it.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ??-ask crewing
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like airspeed is dropping, with the nose coming up and sinking, as he crosses the upwind threshold. I think the sharp turn to line up with the road would have risked a spin, with the next stop, the cemetery - at least he kept it flying. With the benefit of hindsight, the field to the left looks better than turning right (although it still looks full of problems) but he could have done much worse.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The aircraft's red beacon is not on until he is lining up, he's not making use of the entire runway, although it is very long in terms of his needs, and I suppose we give him the benefit of the doubt on pre take off run up having been edited out.
But, despite all the options, I don't think he saw the tree until he was in it, he's looking back at the airfield, off to his right, most of the time.
Can anyone tell me what the legal position is with the FAA and fitting of a camera to the outside of such an aircraft? I'm sure there is a difference between having a licensed aircraft engineer doing it, and the pilot just getting a few cable ties and hoping for the best. This has the look of a kit build, if so, is there not some inspection required if you deviate from the plans?
But, despite all the options, I don't think he saw the tree until he was in it, he's looking back at the airfield, off to his right, most of the time.
Can anyone tell me what the legal position is with the FAA and fitting of a camera to the outside of such an aircraft? I'm sure there is a difference between having a licensed aircraft engineer doing it, and the pilot just getting a few cable ties and hoping for the best. This has the look of a kit build, if so, is there not some inspection required if you deviate from the plans?
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nah its fine over there.
You can fit a motor prop and wings to a bed and if you have the balls go an fly it as an experimental.
Maybe he had been reading PPrune and decided he like the point of view biggles had when he used the second runway at Dundee.
You can fit a motor prop and wings to a bed and if you have the balls go an fly it as an experimental.
Maybe he had been reading PPrune and decided he like the point of view biggles had when he used the second runway at Dundee.
Frankly, I had a bad feeling about the way it was going to end after the guy made the `horns of rock' sign to the camera underneath the fuselage right at the beginning...
