Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Where is your head?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Where is your head?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2013, 01:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is your head?

First time poster long time lurker.

I have a question about something I can't seem to find anywhere on the web. I'm a fairly low time Canadian PPL pilot (98 hours, licensed at 45) who's flown at 6 different airports and 9 different instructors over the last 7 years.

While trying to do a checkout at my latest location the instructor said everything was great except where I put my head during landing. Specifically, when landing the C172/C152 I need to put my head against the left window to "look down the side of the aircraft".

I have never heard of this, my old instructors have never heard of this, my friends have never heard of this and apparently the internet as far as I can see have never heard of this. I have always rounded out keeping my body straight and looking as far down the runway as I can and as I flare I do lose sight of the end of the runway but use my peripheral vision to asses descent rate and being centered on the runway.

He is saying that my landings are unsafe, despite flying 25 hours PIC in the last 12 months at my last location and having 3 different instructors there including a instructor/flight examiner sign off on me. I've never damaged an aircraft during landings doing it the way I've been taught and yet he won't sign off on me renting because until I can land it with my head against the window I'm "unsafe". Has anyone else ever heard of this?

Friends who are flight instructors have said to talk to the CFI (Chief flight instructor not certified flight instructor) since they've never heard of it, and I'd just like another opinion to make sure my friends aren't trying to cover my poor technique.

Thanks
DSoup is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 10:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: have I forgotten or am I lost?
Age: 71
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you dont show any evidence of poor technique.
you are being told a load of nonsense.
have some confidence there boy.

during my training a bazillion years ago now I had an instructor that insisted on low approaches to the runway ...to the point where I had to power on to climb up over the boundary fence on each approach and let down to the touchdown.
nobody could understand his take on the training and so he was awarded the DCM.
(dont come monday, you're sacked).

your guy seems to have developed a similar oddity.

focus away in the distance to judge height and use your peripheral vision to judge position. thats the way you do it.
if your landings are gentle things then you are doing it correctly.
if you keep on banging it on then he may be trying to give you a clue as to how to remedy a fault. ...but it seems an odd suggestion to put your head on the window.
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 10:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In that case he probably would not sign me off either and I am an Instructor who has been flying 30+ years!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 11:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 1,098
Received 83 Likes on 59 Posts
I will have to try the head against the window technique to see if I am missing something. I don't think I will do it with my son as I don't want him to try it, nor with the instructor as I don't want him to think I am bonkers.

Is it possible that you touch down in a crab and he is trying to think of creative ways to help you line up? Mandating the head against the window seems like an odd way to compensate but there is a lot I don't know.
IFMU is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 14:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm learning in a C172 in Canada and that isn't a technique I've heard off and god knows I've been through enough "techniques" trying to nail those elusive landings.

I'd want to know what is it that he considers "unsafe" about your landings.
Centreline? landing with side load on the gear? no flare and too bouncy? flaring too high?

Without that information anything else is pointless speculation. If he can't tell you then that IS a problem.
localflighteast is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 20:07
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He said there isn't enough flare, but the landings aren't hard. What's the safety issue of not "flaring enough" if I'm not smacking it into the ground?
DSoup is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 20:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To me the only issue here would be if you are landing nose wheel first, or all three together, as long as when you land there is a positive interval (ideally a couple of seconds or more, but at least a positive one) between the mains and the nose touching that should be fine - but IMHO the head down the side is not the way to not cure this if that is the problem.

Last edited by foxmoth; 7th Jul 2013 at 20:55.
foxmoth is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 20:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
is he short? when doing my line training in the Islander years ago my then chief pilot suggested I move my booklet of airfield plates out of the space between the windshild and instrument panel to make it possible to see down the side in the flare. I couldn't work it out at the time as I am tall and could see over the top. I cannot see that this should be much of an issue in a 172 though, unless that is the reason then it is a total load of rubbish that he is telling you.
VP-F__ is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 21:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is your head?

I am short
Enough that I need 3 cushions ( 1 under and 2 behind)
I don't land this way
I look down the runway
Hard to make a judgement without being in the plane and I'm but a mere student but landing flat ( no flare) is the recipe for bouncing in my experience
You should be flaring consistently in each landing it is good technique
But if you are bothered then get another opinion
localflighteast is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 22:54
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the mains touch down the nose is in the air for about 2 seconds or so.

I'll talk to the CFI and see what he says, maybe it's an instructor ism, or a school ism.
DSoup is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 06:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It sounds as if the issue is not flaring enough. Landing a light aircraft flat is a bad thing and will certainly result in losing the nosewheel on a 152 eventually, slightly less of an issue on a 172.

To land you should arrive just above the runway at the correct speed as per POH and then close the throttle and slowly pull back on the column until the aircraft stops flying and touches down. If you have it right the yoke should be pretty much all the way back at that point and the nose fairly high
Johnm is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 07:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the flare hold yoke back pressure till the stall warner is going off (should be same/similar attitude as on take-off) and once main wheels are down gently lower the nose. If really bumpy, ie bumpy grass strip or even on concrete/tarmac add a little power when main wheels are down to keep the nose off as long as possible.

Go to another airfield where the CFI is not bonkers. Could be a way to keep you there and acquire more money...or am I being cynical?
Jude098 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 15:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: have I forgotten or am I lost?
Age: 71
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the mains touch down the nose is in the air for about 2 seconds or so.
the problem is that you are landing with the aircraft in a poor attitude.
all aeroplanes need to be landed on the main wheels in a tail low attitude.

your landings are very close to a dangerous situation. you may hear a lot about taildraggers and "ground loops", and never suspect that you could have the problem in a tricycle aircraft. the reality is though that if you wheelbarrow it on in the landing, that is you land on the nose wheel first, you can be set up for the most violent of ground loops. violent enough to destroy the aircraft.

what you need to be doing is hold the aircraft off a little more. as the aircraft slows in the flare ease back the elevator more so that you land in a more nose up attitude. make nose up landings your habit and you will be a lot safer.
the way you are landing now all it takes is a gust, or the lull between gusts and you could bend an aeroplane.

dont feel special, most of us here have been through this ourselves.
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 16:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kent
Age: 61
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only time I've heard anyone talk about a head-to-one-side technique is in tail draggers. In some of these (e.g. Tiger Moth) it's the only way you can see ahead, during the hold-off, when 3-pointing it.

Is the instructor of an age where he might have learnt to fly in Tiger Moths?

OC619
OpenCirrus619 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 20:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
When the mains touch down the nose is in the air for about 2 seconds or so.
the problem is that you are landing with the aircraft in a poor attitude.
all aeroplanes need to be landed on the main wheels in a tail low attitude.
No, if the nose is in the air for that long he is NOT landing it in a poor attitude, 2 seconds might not sound that long, but try counting out (one thousand and one, one thousand and two) when YOU are landing - I doubt that you will hold the nose off much longer than that (unless you have the speed too high).
foxmoth is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 21:32
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tr_no 688
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love learning new stuff, especially when it initially appears bonkers, could you perhaps encourage the instructor to come on here and explain the reasoning behind this technique?
Lone_Ranger is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 00:43
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uh, I could try.

He said next flight he's going to tape A4 sheets across my view to force me to look out the side. Despite my initial reaction saying that's crazy dangerous, we'll see how that goes.

It just sucks to pay extra money for dual instruction after already being licensed.
DSoup is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 01:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
surely that's a recipe for landing left wheel first? how many of us can hold the wings perfectly level while sticking our head all the way to one side?

For the flare i'm always looking at the far end of the runway, and then (if there is one) the fence, if i can see over the fence i'm too high!

Look to the end of the runway judge with your peripheral vision when to flare... its all about feeling, you'll know when you are too high or too fast, the trick is what to do about it!

but the instructor sounds a bit odd...... talk to the CFI especially if he is being painful in signing you off.
FlyingKiwi_73 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 08:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tr_no 688
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, Another quite dramatic sounding statement, are you sure, you are getting his point and not taking his words too literally?, , is he perhaps inferring that you are not using your peripheral vision?.

Have to say, 98 hours in 7 years, is not conducive to maintaining skills
Lone_Ranger is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 08:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is known as the "Labrador" landing technique.

Not after the place - but after the dog, hanging its head out of the side of a moving car, ears flapping. For Pilot's its especially effective when wearing a leather flying helmet so it can flap in the wind like ears.

On a more serious note....

Introducing this kind of random technique to someone who already holds a licence sounds very odd to me.

Your visual senses and equilibrioception (inner ear) senses are quite focused in the final moments of an approach. How much time passes between that initial sense (from visual and vestibular systems) of a wing lift from a gust and the physical correction with the yoke? Its miliseconds, and its instinctive. By the time your at 100 hours - as you are - you will trust your senses and automatically react accordingly.

If you havent been trained in this 'labrador' technique from the start then the last thing you want to be doing now is waving your head around on short finals, creating conflicting information to your senses.

Otherwise the next sensation you'll feel is likely to be the shudder of the 172 off the side of the runway and you wondering how you got there.



I would be really interested to hear this instructors logic!
clunk1001 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.