Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Why are light aircraft allowed

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Why are light aircraft allowed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jun 2013, 09:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,028
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are light aircraft allowed

To fly over Brighton like that?

So what could I answer. I was a guest at a nice house in the centre of town. Mrs effortless and I were happily sitting back and watching a 172 and a PA28 turning overhead, wishing we still could fly ourselves.

I tried "er why not?" But it didn't seem to wash. What could I say apart from explain the height and glide clear rule.

"What! They could crash? I didn't even think of that!" Oh dear.
effortless is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 09:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Horsham
Age: 38
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sat was a good day, flew out of EGKA myself but went east instead of coast this time.

Did see a few low-uns out there as well....

Neo
Neoburner is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 10:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sussex, UK
Age: 37
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saturday was indeed awesome. Did Shoreham -> Oxford (free landing!) -> Stapleford -> Shoreham

Busy skies everywhere, Farnborough sounded a bit overloaded!
ChrisA87 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 11:28
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,028
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok! Rub it in why don't you! I may get a couple of hours in in France later in the year but all I can do is watch you beggas now. Don't get old, don't get unfit, don't get skint. Like a pillock, I did all three.
effortless is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 12:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best to convince someone about the safety of flying is to look at the statistics objectively rather than some perceived fear about "falling out the sky" when in the air.

Currently you'd be several times more likely to be involved in a motoring accident than when in an airplane.
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 12:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,465
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by soaringhigh650
The best to convince someone about the safety of flying is to look at the statistics objectively rather than some perceived fear about "falling out the sky" when in the air.

Currently you'd be several times more likely to be involved in a motoring accident than when in an airplane.
Think that depends what statistics you use. Yes, far fewer pilots are in an accident each year than motorists, but you need to look at the per hour and/or per journey figures.
cats_five is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 12:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are light aircraft allowed
Because EASA hasn't found a way to ban them yet.

However, they are getting there!

D.O.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 12:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, far fewer pilots are in an accident each year than motorists, but you need to look at the per hour and/or per journey figures.
Yeah but someone has basically assessed it as the same risk of riding a motorcycle with a huge percentage of those accidents caused by pilot error - not by mechanical or engeering failure.
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 15:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I tried "er why not?" But it didn't seem to wash.
It should have done.

It's fairly fundamental in the UK that everything is allowed unless there is a law against it, and there should only be laws against things, ie laws restricting people's freedom, for good reasons. So it was up to your questionner to answer your "why not?".
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 16:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 639
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I bet if light aircraft were first thought of today they wouldn't be allowed...
Heston is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 16:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
The best to convince someone about the safety of flying is to look at the statistics objectively rather than some perceived fear about "falling out the sky" when in the air.

Currently you'd be several times more likely to be involved in a motoring accident than when in an airplane.
More accidents per mile, motoring. More fatal accidents per mile by far with light aircraft. Flying isn't 'safer than the drive to the airport' - unless you're going by airliner.
abgd is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 16:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't wait until you get to the end of this life and say I wish I had.

Go out and do it. Get in that aircraft and do the training. It will be the best thing you ever did. There is nothing quite like it....well ok some things, lol.
Jude098 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 20:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Oxfordshire
Posts: 638
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Strange how people like different things. I grew up in Shoreham, and although on the face of it, it's nothing special I love the place. Blissful memories of lying on the beach or the South Downs in blazing sunshine with the smell of the sea and the sound of light aircraft lazily buzzing about. The sound of small planes still gets me all nostalgic twenty years after moving away.
Blues&twos is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 00:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Don't wait until you get to the end of this life and say I wish I had.
Not certain whether that was directed at me, or more a general comment. I have a PPL already and fly as often as time and money allow.
abgd is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 18:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Essex
Age: 52
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More accidents per mile, motoring. More fatal accidents per mile by far with light aircraft. Flying isn't 'safer than the drive to the airport' - unless you're going by airliner.
1901 were killed on the roads in the uk in 2011 and 23122 seriously injured. Not sure how one would calculate the per mile or per movement values but the roads are pretty dangerous

If someone tried to invent the motor car today telling us that it would kill nearly 2000 people every year would that be allowed?
davydine is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 18:38
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,028
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A good read is the Tombstone Imerative, he postulates that miles traveled isn't a good comparator. Journeys number is better.
effortless is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 19:45
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Well, it's difficult to do well because aircraft data is relatively sketchy compared to data for road transport. However, the differences are stark enough that it's safe to conclude that GA is inherently more risky however you work it out - by hour, distance, number of participants or number of journeys. Anybody who argues otherwise is frankly delusional.

One difference is that road transport kills 70% car occupants/motorcyclists and 30% pedestrians/cyclists*, whereas it's relatively speaking much rarer for GA to kill any non-participants.

* Whilst cyclists may be responsible for a minority of car/cyclist accidents, they very rarely kill themselves unassisted though are almost as dangerous to pedestrians per passenger-mile as cars.

Last edited by abgd; 11th Jun 2013 at 19:47.
abgd is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 20:49
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Essex
Age: 52
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone who argues otherwise is frankly delusional
Not arguing, I simply don't have enough data to put a strong case either way, i just think the fact that nearly 70 people will be killed or seriously injured on Britain's roads every day is a shocking statistic which most people are not aware of.

As a matter of interest, can anyone estimate how many aircraft movements there were in the uk last year, when you include all types of aviation such as baloons, microlights, gliders, light aircraft? I would imagine it is not possible, just as it is unlikely we can get an accurate number of road journeys there are, so it seems unlikely we can prove this one way or another.
davydine is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 21:46
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that it might be easier to estimate the number of aircraft and cars rather than movements.

I suspect cars are used far more frequently than the aircraft, however I also suspect that even ignoring this GA will be more dangerous.
dublinpilot is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2013, 22:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Well, there are 31 million cars on the road and about 20,000 light aircraft including balloons etc:

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/56/UK%20re...p%20010110.pdf

and an average of about 30 deaths per year for all forms of light aviation.

So, there are 1500 times as many cars on the roads but only about 65 times as many road fatalities as there are GA fatalities. And whilst school aircraft get well utilised, I would wager that the average driver utilises the average car a lot more than the average ppl uses the average aircraft.

Another estimate is that there are 1.3 million hours of flying done in the UK each year, so there's about one death for every 43000 hours of flying - which sounds about right - typically GA is said to have one fatal accident for every 100,000 hours or so of flight but there can be more than one death per accident.

https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...nts2010-01.pdf gives some comparable statistics for motoring.

I haven't the time or inclination to trudge through all the statistics again, but the differences are enough that whichever way you look at it and and even allowing for huge inaccuracies, aviation comes out way behind in the safety stakes.

I still go flying, and I have fun, but I hope that I treat it with the seriousness that it deserves.

Last edited by abgd; 11th Jun 2013 at 23:28.
abgd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.