SOLENT DILEMA
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All UK VFR Charts have grid MEF (Maximum Elevation Figures) printed. These, as (with one correction)
Backpacker says, are the:
MSA (Minimum Safe Altitude) is an IFR term (talking about it wrt VFR flight can only be confusing) and,
in the legend, on UK charts it specifically says that for the MEF "NB: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY ALTITUDE"
The MEF can, however, be an easy way to calculate the MSA (just add 1,000", or 2,000' in mountainous areas)
rather than searching all along 5nm either side of your proposed route.
Most (all?) European VFR Charts do not give MEF, but rather give an already calculated MSA for each grid.
Some IFR charts give a Minimum Sector Altitude which, confusingly, also is abbreviated
MSA (but this will always be at, or above, the Minimum Safety Altitude.
It is important to have read the legend, on whatever chart is being used,
so that it is known what the figures represent.
Backpacker says, are the:
- Altitude of the highest obstacle in the grid, rounded up to the nearest 100'.
- Altitude of the highest terrain in the grid, plus 299' to account for an unknown obstacle, rounded up
to the nearest 100'. (There is no notification requirement for obstacles up to 300'; that's why we
add 299' if we use the highest terrain figure.)
- Altitude of the highest terrain in the grid, plus 299' to account for an unknown obstacle, rounded up
to the nearest 100'. (There is no notification requirement for obstacles up to 300'; that's why we
add 299' if we use the highest terrain figure.)
in the legend, on UK charts it specifically says that for the MEF "NB: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY ALTITUDE"
The MEF can, however, be an easy way to calculate the MSA (just add 1,000", or 2,000' in mountainous areas)
rather than searching all along 5nm either side of your proposed route.
Most (all?) European VFR Charts do not give MEF, but rather give an already calculated MSA for each grid.
Some IFR charts give a Minimum Sector Altitude which, confusingly, also is abbreviated
MSA (but this will always be at, or above, the Minimum Safety Altitude.
It is important to have read the legend, on whatever chart is being used,
so that it is known what the figures represent.
Last edited by Level Attitude; 9th May 2013 at 01:16.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most (all?) European VFR Charts do not give MEF, but rather give an already calculated MSA for each grid.
In the Netherlands we've got a new printer, once again, for the "ICAO" charts. I haven't seen their charts yet.
Some IFR charts give a Minimum Sector Altitude which, confusingly, also is abbreviated
MSA (but this will always be at, or above, the Minimum Safety Altitude.
MSA (but this will always be at, or above, the Minimum Safety Altitude.
When these things are clearly laid down for all to see why do we get so may: "Well, my instructor said..." posts?
This isn't aimed at any individual on this thread or any other, just a query after reading these posts for years.
Sorry, this is terrible thread drift and I hope that the OP got the answer they needed before we all headed off on this somewhat irrelevant (to the original question) MSA, MEF discussion.
This isn't aimed at any individual on this thread or any other, just a query after reading these posts for years.
Sorry, this is terrible thread drift and I hope that the OP got the answer they needed before we all headed off on this somewhat irrelevant (to the original question) MSA, MEF discussion.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When these things are clearly laid down for all to see why do we get so may: "Well, my instructor said..." posts?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South East
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many thanks for all your replies, it has cleared up a lot and makes more sense. I have decided on 1700 ft and will contact Bournemouth. Just need the weather now!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gone
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And remember transiting the airspace IFR will incur costs of £60.
http://www.southamptonairport.com/st...sOfUse_SOU.pdf
It is also understood wef 1/4/14 the use of oxygen through that airspace will be
offered by ATC as an optional extra. The tariff will be calculated on airspeed at £27.50 per minute, plus vat.
http://www.southamptonairport.com/st...sOfUse_SOU.pdf
It is also understood wef 1/4/14 the use of oxygen through that airspace will be
offered by ATC as an optional extra. The tariff will be calculated on airspeed at £27.50 per minute, plus vat.
Spink Pots
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Up in the air
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And remember transiting the airspace IFR will incur costs of £60.
Southampton Airport: Welcome to Southampton Airport | Parking
Southampton Airport: Welcome to Southampton Airport | Parking
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southampton
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Southampton Airport
Hi All,
In relation to the Southampton International Airport Conditions of Use document as issued on the 28th March 2013, we can confirm that Southampton Airport will not be charging for IFR zone transits. We have never charged any aircraft for a zone transit under IFR or VFR conditions.
This charge relates to aircraft that utilise the ILS at Southampton for non-training purposes i.e. cloud breaks under IFR conditions. This charge should not be confused with the use of the ILS for training purposes, for which there is a separate charging structure that will come into effect on the 20th May 2013. We will provide further information on this if required.
The relevant paragraph within the Conditions Of Use document is being updated to make this position clear. The updated document will be posted on the Southampton Airport website shortly.
Southampton Airport has worked extremely hard over the past 18 months to engage with the GA community and to date have had over 150 general aviation pilots visit the airport to discuss airspace safety and general operations around the Solent zone. We would like to take this opportunity to extend this invitation to any club, organisation or syndicate that would like to visit us.
We fully intend to continue to engage with the G.A community. On behalf of Southampton Airport, If you have any further queries or comments please do not hesitate to contact me by email on [email protected] Please note that I am unable to respond to questions through this forum, I can only respond directly through email on the address as above.
Thank you.
Mike
In relation to the Southampton International Airport Conditions of Use document as issued on the 28th March 2013, we can confirm that Southampton Airport will not be charging for IFR zone transits. We have never charged any aircraft for a zone transit under IFR or VFR conditions.
This charge relates to aircraft that utilise the ILS at Southampton for non-training purposes i.e. cloud breaks under IFR conditions. This charge should not be confused with the use of the ILS for training purposes, for which there is a separate charging structure that will come into effect on the 20th May 2013. We will provide further information on this if required.
The relevant paragraph within the Conditions Of Use document is being updated to make this position clear. The updated document will be posted on the Southampton Airport website shortly.
Southampton Airport has worked extremely hard over the past 18 months to engage with the GA community and to date have had over 150 general aviation pilots visit the airport to discuss airspace safety and general operations around the Solent zone. We would like to take this opportunity to extend this invitation to any club, organisation or syndicate that would like to visit us.
We fully intend to continue to engage with the G.A community. On behalf of Southampton Airport, If you have any further queries or comments please do not hesitate to contact me by email on [email protected] Please note that I am unable to respond to questions through this forum, I can only respond directly through email on the address as above.
Thank you.
Mike
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many thanks for all your replies, it has cleared up a lot and makes more sense. I have decided on 1700 ft and will contact Bournemouth. Just need the weather now!
Glad you got an answer to your original question
no minimum height for VFR flight
I'm afraid there is.
In EASA land it is 500' agl - and, consequently, the UK has now also adopted this.
IFR flight ....... these departures and approaches are carefully surveyed individually for terrain and obstacles
Your quote above is only true of SIDs, STARs and IAPs
Nothing to prevent any flight, from/to any airfield, in any airspace
being flown according to IFR - This is currently true in the UK
(and elsewhere?) and will be true for the whole of Europe from
April 2014 when SERA comes in to force.