Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Pilot Errors

Old 2nd April 2013 | 14:18
  #21 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: On the couch
Not making the performance calculations because "it always works out"
Not checking the fuel inbalance when flying a SEP with 2 fuel tanks
rayfill is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2013 | 15:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: EU
The biggest factor in GA:

"I'm a big, rich important business man therefore I am ruthless and do what I want and don't give 2 !!!!!s about the safety of others because I am my own aviation authority".

That tends to be a big one at my local club and it infuriates me.
pudoc is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2013 | 16:35
  #23 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
DAR - is that Lake Simcoe?

i was flying over lake Skugog on Saturday, the ice looked like it was just giving way to spring, I even commented to my husband that I wouldn't like to be out on it. I guess simcoe gave way huh?
localflighteast is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2013 | 17:07
  #24 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: spacetime
I wonder how many of us actually go through the operating handbook from page one to the hold. There are four in our flying group and one in particular thinks of the cockpit as a car and carries out his checks from memory. I did it once and once only after I left the nosewheel chock in place and tried to move off the parking stand. Lesson learnt. No matter how much you think you know the procedure off by heart I guarantee you will not.
gemma10 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2013 | 19:43
  #25 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 918
Likes: 2
From: Cambridge
Quote:
hard IFR
Simulated or Actual?
I meant actual. A Cirrus SR22 crashed at Zurich airport in exactly these circumstances, I think some five years ago.
Jonzarno is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2013 | 20:58
  #26 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
I want to add another item to the list:

Inadequate, poor or simply non existent flight planning and preparation.

I remember my first map reading exercise. The cockpit was a complete mess of nav charts, weight and balance sheets, performance graphs, weather printouts, NOTAMs and my flight plan (buried in there somewhere) when we took off. No sooner were we wheels up when my instructor asked me for my pencil because he wanted to change a waypoint on the route I had chosen. A mere nanosecond into the proceeding chaos I learned a very important lesson about proper preparation.
flyinkiwi is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2013 | 22:44
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 2
From: Oxford, UK
Lots of little mistakes mentioned. But there are big mistakes that are by far most dangerous, and kill more pilots.

Number one: trying to turn back to the airfield with engine trouble when TOO LOW. And of course too low to recover from the spin that is the consequence.
(Always have a plan B in mind before you take off)

Number two: pressing on to planned destination when the weather is getting worse.....Never be ashamed to return to base, don't worry what anyone else will think of that sensible decision.

Fatigue. Under pressure. Don't be afraid to say no. I found a useful phrase to be "These conditions are over my personal limitations."
mary meagher is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2013 | 23:16
  #28 (permalink)  
XLC
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Quite an experienced instructor told me once that pilots are most vulnerable to errors every 150 hours (or about), due to confidence & negligence.
Interesting statistic, and a good pointer to all of us, if correct. Can anyone corroborate this?
XLC is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2013 | 07:01
  #29 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 5
From: The Wild West (UK)
There is a book called 'the killing zone' which argues approximately this. There were some big problems with the way the crash statistics had been analysed, so I don't know whether or not it's true.
abgd is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2013 | 07:53
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
There is the same sort of accident statistic with scuba diving every 150 dives you have some screw up. Some more dangerous than others.

When you first get told this by the more experenced divers you think that will be right. But after 850 odd dives it held pretty true.

Unfortunately one of my diving instructors died while diving a clyde wreck. Dive number 1147 or there abouts.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2013 | 11:35
  #31 (permalink)  
Fly Conventional Gear
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: Winchester
I think the main lesson from the experience vs. likelihood of accident analysis is that one is never completely safe and in fact after a lot of hours one has to guard against complacency even more.
Contacttower is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2013 | 12:22
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
There is a book called 'the killing zone' which argues approximately this. There were some big problems with the way the crash statistics had been analysed, so I don't know whether or not it's true.
Nobody much believes the statistics in that book, but the case studies are instructive.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2013 | 18:34
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Europe
The NTSB has recently published five Safety Alerts about the most common accident causes related to pilot error, maybe this can help you:

General Aviation Safety Alerts
sunside is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 00:23
  #34 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 5
From: The Wild West (UK)
Nobody much believes the statistics in that book, but the case studies are instructive.
Maybe that's so, but it's published by an academic publisher at an academic price so I think it's appropriate to expect a basic level of statistical literacy from the author. There are cheaper and better books on the subject.
abgd is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2013 | 02:59
  #35 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Canadian Forces
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,658
Likes: 501
From: Canada
When you start flying you have two buckets

Bucket 1 = Luck

Bucket 2 = Experience

The luck bucket will be full and the experience bucket will be empty. The trick is to fill up the experience bucket before you empty the luck bucket....
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 00:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Oz Trailer
This might be of interest?:

http://www.mastery-flight-training.c...ng_lessons.pdf


TB
TunaBum is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 13:19
  #37 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 2
From: Worcestershire, UK
Forgetting to renew your JAR licence after 5 years as your class ratings are still valid and the CAA din't see fit to send out reminders.
Mariner9 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 13:37
  #38 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 523
Likes: 1
From: Kent
When it goes "quiet up front" being concerned about the aircraft - instead of those in it.

Interesting stats show the survivability of the ensuing landing/crash is related to the type of aircraft. From least survivable to most:
  • Rare / Vintage / Warbird
  • Homebuilt
  • Privately Owned
  • Club

Surprisingly it turns out the reason, behind these stats, is NOT due to:
  • Aircraft type / performance / complexity
  • Aircraft maintenance
  • Pilot skill / experience

It turns out to relate to how much the pilot values the aircraft.

The most survivable accidents are when the pilot does his best to look after the occupants - if the aircraft is usable again, after the landing, it's a bonus.

The least survivable accidents are when the pilot tries too hard to make a perfect landing, in a perfect field - usually stretching the glide in the process.

Before someone says it I DO realise that the safest outcome is going to be a perfect landing in a perfect field - as long as one is available. If there is not one within safe angle/distance then the pilot who concentrates on "hitting the softest thing available as slowly as possible" is going to get the best outcome for the occupants.

OC619
OpenCirrus619 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 18:26
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: EU
Here's my stupid mistake, and yes it does follow a chain of events as mentioned!

-PPL instructor whines he doesn't earn enough

-He always asks me to do a quick turnaround...so he would land, I'd oil/fuel up whilst he debriefs new student and he meets me outside engine running.

-He lands late but still wants to do our lesson before the sun sets. When he lands he doesn't seem relaxed and jolly like normal but a bit serious (maybe flustered?? don't know if that's the right word).

-I didn't want to disappoint him. Firstly because students tend to look up to their instructors and secondly I arrived late for a lesson the previous day for which I received a telling off.

-Rushed the 'turn around'

-Tried to taxi to fuel pumps with the tie downs still on.

The tie downs aren't connected to hooks in the ground but they clip onto another wire which runs a long a whole line of aircraft. So technically I tried to taxi with around 8 planes attached to me. Nothing happend as a guy performing a walk around next to me waved me down before I started moving.

Suppose to sum that up, don't put undue pressures on yourself. Don't rush.

Last edited by pudoc; 22nd April 2013 at 18:32.
pudoc is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 20:18
  #40 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 16
From: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Number two: pressing on to planned destination when the weather is getting worse.....Never be ashamed to return to base, don't worry what anyone else will think of that sensible decision.
YES. And being too busy inside the cockpit to notice the weather situation, and change your route to avoid weather.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.